• Snakechapman [any]
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Can we get some remote sensing/ geography academic articles about instead of horrifying clickbait with stock photos and by side pictures from different locations?

    We can do better than Q-pilled boomers folks. If this is true , it should be well published. Better propaganda is made with verifiable facts than clickbait. We cant clickbait ourselves into a revolution.

    Edit: the whole desert didnt disappear and only greened a little bit actually. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ISPAr42.3.2127Y/abstract

      • Snakechapman [any]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        The more time I spend on cha.cha the less I believe

        • hauntingspectre [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Look, if we say our ideology is scientific, we don't have to apply critical thinking or evidence based inquiries to anything else.

    • TossedAccount [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Good point, I would love to see more evidence that these policies are doing what the headlines imply.

    • MonarchLabsOne [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's crazy that China is one of the only countries trying to do something about climate change and the West is still able to fear monger about them.

    • cresspacito [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I agree but also disagree, the right shows every day that you can just make shit up that sounds good, I think it's about tailoring to your audience. If I wanted to convert a load of dumb chuds, I wouldn't just straight make stuff up but I'd sensationalise the fuck out of propaganda. It's like when leftists debate conservatives, the right-wing viewers just want to see a lib get owned, they don't care about facts, which is why I want to see a leftist who is good at roasting people just straight bully Shapiro or Crowder. Maybe we can train one up, raise funds for an improv class lol