Cool you helped someone, but you're doing it for profit and clout. fuck off.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Wait till you hear about bumfights. or whatever it was called.

    Yeah, something needs to be done about the dehumanisation of poor people.

  • BillyMays [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    “I’m not doing this for any praise or money. Just hoping to inspire others to do the same.”

    • Washburn [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      "I am going to monetize the video and advertise my brand of hoodies here tho"

  • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    It's exploitative and i am always left with a feeling of if they gave that much of a shit, they would do it off camera

    but ultimately, if youtube wankstain #492 gives a homeless person 10 grand on their apology tour or whatever, i'm not exactly going to tell them to stop

    i do still reserve the right to think they're a twat though

    • BillyMays [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Jesus is antithesis of America. He would hate all these people.

  • VHS [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Yeah, I think we all agree that's bad

  • Tittyskittles [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    There’s always one on the popular page of Reddit. If it’s not a homeless person, it’s helping a dog or goldfish or something. It’s always the op humble bragging about being a good person to. Somehow this goes hand in hand with all the other reactionary shit on there

  • Liberalism [he/him,they/them]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    It irritates me, and I think it irritates everyone, but materially speaking isn't it the same as helping people and not taking credit?

    Unless someone tells me a good reason why it's bad for society I'm pretty much content with letting it be something that rubs me the wrong way but isn't actually immoral.

      • crispyhexagon [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        beyond that, its not materially the same because the monetization means the grifter is materially gaining from the interaction.

        theyre exploiting the other persons suffering as a means of generating profit.

        like how a mutual aid program is materially distinct from a tax haven charity that a billionaire sets up to ostensibly help the same people.

        one helps, the other siphons funds

      • Liberalism [he/him,they/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        I agree with this. I think it's evidence of general bad character, I think the reason it's frowned upon is because it's a signal that you don't really care, and I wouldn't do it myself. But also, that doesn't make it an immoral action in and of itself unless it actually hurts someone, I feel.

  • ShitPosterior [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Idk tho, imagine some minor celeb goes full blown praxis helping homeless people & starts documenting the whole thing - isn't it liable to show their audience how fucking dope it is?

    I mean if they're using the monetization to not go directly back to those homeless people then fuck em that sucks, but I could see the good in boasting - the shits potentially contagious. But probably they're doing it for ego fuel