I seriously doubt that the Wall Street situation can hold out until after the Senate Filibuster situation gets resolved, if they ever do remove or water down the filibuster at all. So this seems like a likely outcome.
They're gonna bail out Wall Street again. Fucking again.
And not just bail them out. IMMEDIATELY bail them out.
:obama-drone: uhhhh.... Muh legacy
Bailing out wall st bros before freeing children in cages will be a jokerfying moment indeed
Yes this is exactly why this situation Is so good and why I can’t understand all these fucking whiny babies around here. There are no really good moves for the bourgeoisie class in this situation because they unknowingly let a bunch of wolves in their henhouse.
Proletarian revolution, but everyone is dressed like Gordon Gecko with joker makeup on
Proletarian revolution, but everyone is wearing neon green wolf fursuits
Martin Shkreli did the exact same thing a few years ago, to a greater extent. A bunch of other Wall Street firms are cashing in on the action. Wall Street isn't taking any kind of significant hit from this as a whole. If anything, it's probably gonna get a bunch more people involved in the stock market which is good for them. The framing of the whole thing is really weird. The "victim" is not Wall Street in general, it is Melvin Capital, which probably lost a couple billion, and a few other firms. It's also important to realize that most of the gains didn't even go to the WSB people, they weren't the only ones who bought the shares. Not like other Wall St. ghouls would skip on the action. Not to mention the 3 largest GME shareholders, who whose net worths increased by a hundreds of millions each.
Melvin was bailed out by another company, I'm not sure what this has to do with Biden? I mean, Biden being Biden will probably bail out a bunch of ghouls including Wall St. for corona or whatever at some point but, like, in 2008 the bailout was hundreds of billions of dollars, nothing remotely comparable would happen for the gamestonk thing.
Oh but you have to recognize what makes this a very different situation. Martin Shkreli is an INDIVIDUAL! they have to rewrite the playbook to stop the collective of retail investors. And yes the stock market is still an evil institution that must be destroyed. When you say things like “it’s only Melvin capital taking a hit, not wallstreet” I think you’re under estimating what a small club these people are in. And not only that, they have enough bourgeoisie class consciousness to understand that what’s happening is a threat to all of them. The easy solution for the feds would be to just regulate short selling out of existence but Wall streets gains are really dependent on fake things like that and the government doesn’t want to reveal that because it will reveal our economic system to be a sham. I mean Martin shkreli was a problem for these people too even if he was a fucking slime ball. Because he did the thing, showed how it’s all a sham. I do think it’s an interesting parallel to bring up but I gotta highlight the differences.
Martin Shkreli is an INDIVIDUAL!
Shkreli and his firm organzied it and started it, he wasn't the only one doing it. It is true that they're kind of annoyed at what is happening because they are afraid it will make the already very volatile stock market even more volatile. But it's hardly a big hit.
When you say things like “it’s only Melvin capital taking a hit, not wallstreet” I think you’re under estimating what a small club these people are in
Well, the entire stock market is some firms taking hits at the benefit of others. And Melvin is hardly TBTF, they control around 13 billion in assets, which is a lot, but not game changing stuff (plus they got bailed out by another company anyways so they're not close to failing either).
You are right to an extent that this is kind of a threat, but the threat isn't WSB taking the rich people's money. They threat is stock market collapsing again due to all the volatility randos gambling brings into the game. Not all agree btw, there are bougie economists who actually think this is good and healthy for the system. I'm not sure if the ones panicking or the ones saying it's good are correct here but I wouldn't overestimate the scope of this.
BTW I brought up Shkreli because it is the most extreme recent example I can think of, but short squeezing is a thing that happens semi-frequently to varying extents.
But even organizing at the level of a chartered firm is different then what’s happening here. I guess I just come down more on the side of the stock market collapsing being a net good for the nascent left of this country. And honestly I think this experience raises a lot of questions in my mind about what a democratically controlled economy would look like. Given the technology we have at hand now. Would it be similar to retail investing except; everyone starts with the same amount to invest, you also work where you invest and that’s part of how people decide where and how they labor, and all speculative devices are banned as well as investing firms whose only job is investing? I’m sure I’m missing things but I’d be very curious to hear other comrades thoughts on how many steps there are between what’s happening now and a democratized economy.
The only thing that is different now is that investing is more convenient. It doesn't democratise the economy at all. Democratising the economy means the working class collectively controls the means of production. The stock market is a system that prevents that, and ultimately encourages and rewards speculators and corporate ghouls. Making access to it easier doesn't change these relations, and at a macroscopic level, a lot more randos will get burned a lot more than the ghouls at the top.
Not sure if the stock market collapsing will be good for the US left. Maybe. But I'm not 100% sure I am looking forward to having the suicide rate soar yet again over here because Americans at Wall Street got a bit too cute.
The only thing that is different now is that investing is more convenient.
even that's a stretch. day trading's been hyped on and off for as long as the internet has existed
like I guess robinhood web 2.0-ifying it has increased the convenience factor, but not significantly
Ok yeah I agree that Is the end goal. But on a day to day basis what does that look like for people? How do we set that up in a way people are enthusiastic to participate in? Yes the stock market is evil and must be destroyed I feel like you’re angrily agreeing at me lol. I mean historically the stock market imploding has been good for the U.S. left but hey that pessimistic shit is always correct if you never risk anything. Are you saying suicide will go up Globally as a result of this? In America that’s definitely true but I don’t think this will be what people point to on historical review that made so many people suicidal. It’s possible but we’ll see. I’m throwin a Hundo on funeral home stocks!
But on a day to day basis what does that look like for people? How do we set that up in a way people are enthusiastic to participate in?
Are we about to do a revolution? How are we supposed to determine the details of the structure of a post revolutionary economy?
Are you saying suicide will go up Globally as a result of this? In America that’s definitely true but I don’t think this will be what people point to on historical review that made so many people suicidal.
I'm saying that because it is what happened here as a direct result of 2008. The American stock market shitting itself was the catalyst that triggered a global recession and massive debt crises in southern Europe. Here unemployment almost reached 30% and suicide rates jumped up by like 33%. So it is a thing that happens and I'm not super stoked about it happening again, unless we could use it to finally make radical change, but I'm not seeing that right now.
It's hilarious honestly, they act within the day to protect wall street and put off relief money to citizens until march.
Yeah I think it is. Inevitably most of these people are going to lose against Wall St, and many will be economically-anti-establishment-radicalized, with many towards the right. I've honestly never felt more accelerationist than I do right now.
yeah but its not us doing it. its them doing it. we just need to pick them up, like a friend in an abusive relationship who needs things to get bad enough before they'll accept help for themselves or criticism of their wonderful perfect beloved shithead.
Wow that's actually the best accelerationism analogy. The longer an abusive partner remains stable and ok-ish, the more harm it can eventually cause. Not wishing for the abusive partner to be violent per se, rather understanding that they likely must show themselves for who they are for it to ever come to an end.
right. and as the friend who's been telling them it's a terribad idea FOREVER, this is the time we need to be there, telling them "this is next", rather than "I told you so" or claiming their going deeper into the abuse is praxis.
I'm not an accellerationist, I don't think you need to do the bad shit to take advantage, but it's happening, and this is the time to get people woke. there's an audiobook of conquest of bread on librevox, i might make another that doesn't start off with a dispassionate halty voice or heavy sometimes-obfuscatory accent before getting to the really good readers.
Does a significant amount of people really call themselves "accelerationists" without irony? The concept is understandable, people 'feeling accelerationist' is understandable, but as a personal descriptor it seems silly and bad.
Exactly, and it's so fucking funny
Even more important is going to be the inevitably pro-capital response of liberal establishment, which hopefully will radicalize thousands.
As if literally any lib will care. They just don't care. We live in a post fact universe
I mean
2008 created literally millions of socialists, I think this will make at least a dent
@SerLava might be one of the brave posters that removes the default upvote
That's the secret. It's never been about facts, it's always been about having a better story, with a better villain.
Yeah, still haven't gotten my 2nd stimulus, because they mailed it to my old address, and my car needs 1800$ in repairs.
I have mixed feelings because she whacked Lenin but also accelerated Stalin into power.
Robinhood and other apps have stopped letting you buy GME stock, and only letting you sell. People panic sold and increased the size of available stock, halving the price. If this market manipulation succeeds, there might not need to be a bailout, because all the retail traders will be fucked.
Have you seen any quantitative data on a panic sell? The drop in price can also be explained simply by the fact that buying has been halted for the largest purchaser of GME. If there isn't a massive influx of GME sales, the short sellers are still in an impossible situation.
There was a pretty big influx of shares over an hour that caused the price to go from over 400 to 132, but the price is back up to about 270 after traders in other countries started buying. I think most of that sell was from the normal people who got in late with small shares, because WSB has been screaming to hold.
I've read some analysis that major hedge funds. which shorted GME are selling shares back and forth between each other to artificially reduce the price.
Reuters is reporting they lost $56b between the middle of yesterday and now [1] This is absurd.
This seems to be the general consensus over at Reddit. I hope they're right because I put some cash into GME instead of my savings this week... it wasn't much, but my partner recently lost their health insurance and almost definitely caught COVID from work. The money I invested wouldn't have made a dent either way if we need the hospital, so I'm taking a gamble and hoping for the best.
It is a gamble because these capitalists are immensely powerful. The short squeezers are in a winning position, but we do not know the degree to which they can bend the rules. If they bend the rules, it may deepen the financial crisis, so they may be forced to pay out.
I hope everything works out, comrade.
Guess Biden's doing the Obama Admin speed run any % challenge
two recessions without reinstating Glass-Steagall, but now they chomp at the bit for regulations because a few hedge funds might lose money
