• Wertheimer [any]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      I missed that one.

      Lawmakers can override a governor’s veto with a two-thirds vote, but they have not tried in decades.

      . . .the governor vetoed Wiener's Senate Bill 90, which caps the cost of insulin at $35 per month. The bill had previously passed the Assembly 79-0 and passed the Senate on 39-0.

      This is perfect football-lucy Democrat behavior, where they get to be on record for supporting something but still make sure it never happens. A supermajority where nothing can happen because the governorship is inevitably a spot to put someone who wants to run for President. The most Blue MAGA state in the country.

      • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        the governor vetoed Wiener's Senate Bill 90, which caps the cost of insulin at $35 per month. The bill had previously passed the Assembly 79-0 and passed the Senate on 39-0

        Why is the governor even able to veto something that passed with a veto-proof majority? Sorry pal you already lost.

        • Wertheimer [any]
          hexagon
          ·
          1 year ago

          agony-immense

          Of the 66 bills vetoed by Newsom, all but 10 passed both houses by a two-thirds vote or more — the same threshold needed for a veto override but unlikely to spark such action when the Legislature reconvenes in January.

          https://www.latimes.com/california/newsletter/2021-10-15/california-politics-governor-all-powerful-veto-ca-politics

        • quarrk [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Perhaps the votes only passed that hard because the congress was confident he would veto it anyway. If the rules changed, so would the votes, probably. Or maybe it would have not even made it to a vote.

    • panopticon [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also people don't have homes, I look forward to this smug bastard eating liquid shit in 2024

  • Bloobish [comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh and he also vetoed a bill that would make it mandatory for hearing aids to be included for children's health insurance coverage, the fucking tool.

  • sicklemode [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Gruesome Newsom on quite the streak. Still, one has to wonder if these bills only ever made it to his desk on the condition he would veto them, to tease people into vote harder football-lucy mentality.

    Maybe I'm wrong about that, but it does seem awfully convenient to legitimize a system that a passive observer would consider "working, but just one person ruined it" (if one person can fuck the whole thing, how is that viable?)

  • captcha [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On the other hand, what's up with all the California dems sending all these cool bills across his desk? CA dems can't be happy about.

    Edit: checked some CA subreddits and the general vibe ranges from "I guess the issue is more nuanced" to, "this asshole wants to be president".

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • VILenin [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s easy to enthusiastically support good things when you know full well there’s zero chance of it actually happening

  • footfaults
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • mkultrawide [any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it's already covered, then you pass the bill, because it doesn't do anything. This is Newsome trying to cozy up to the brahmin money.

      • footfaults
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        deleted by creator

      • Vode An@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also has the benefit of making it clear that it won’t be tolerated. Reiterating is worthwhile, and from the stories my tech friends have told it’s necessary.