Boys under-18 being exposed to pornographic material is the most unspoken problem in our society & we got adult girls here profiting off of that.

Unbelievable.


I don't know why this isn't getting the attention that it should.

We are witnessing pedophilic adult females groom young boys & getting paid for it.

Something's not right when we permit these things.

  • Rem [she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Adult girls

    How is it this hard for people to use the word Woman

    • BakaToTest [des/pair]
      ·
      4 years ago

      They should be housewives, but they can’t ask for money or else they’re gold diggers who should get a job.

      My POS father.

    • ComradeBongwater [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Women who don't do the horny are prude and bad. Women who do the horny are sluts and bad...unless its with me, in which case, they're bad for other reason. Women bad.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Honestly, I begin to question whether girls are allowed to exist at all. They violate me just by existing.

  • emizeko [they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    the most unspoken problem in our society

    [furious jerking off motion]

  • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Is "groom" going to become one of those words that loses its meaning through overuse?

    Fuck, what's going to happen to weddings

  • 5HT [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Porn industry ruining young women's lives: I sleep.

    Women making money in their own terms, through regulated websites where only adults can open an account: real shit.

    If they care so much about kids maybe they should focus on free and available porn sites filled with abusive/rape fantasies and more.

  • GrandAyatollaLenin [he/him,comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I've been quiet for awhile because my views will get the feminists angry, I was as diplomatic as I could.

    Anti-Feminism being incoherent misogyny example #582984

  • YungTheorist [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    I do kinda agree with the horrible influence pornography has, but I don’t think that it is right at all to blame women for it.

    Pornography does build a narrative of objectification and sexualizing human bodies, as well as glorifying sex

    • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's reactionary thought in a nutshell: Diagnose the problem half-right, then offer some horrible, punitive solution.

      For example: You aren't getting paid enough at your job, but if we make immigrants non-persons, that'll fix it.

      • YungTheorist [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah. Just fucking ban porn, and punish the people who exploit women

        • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          I don't think banning porn is the response for a number of reasons. An immediate improvement would be labor protections for sex workers of all kinds, an intermediate fix would be something like a job guarantee (so that the choice to do sex work is a meaningful one), and a full solution would just be socialism.

            • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I suppose I'm having a hard time understanding sexualization as a problem if it isn't accompanied by exploitation. I guess you still have body image concerns, but that issue extends far beyond porn. Would you mind clarifying a bit?

              • YungTheorist [he/him]
                ·
                4 years ago

                My body is my own thing, don’t bring my body into this.

                Sexualization leads to objectification, which is inherently evil as it removes agency from someone

                • Leningrab [he/him]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Lust is a normal human emotion. Trying to stop that is futile

                • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  I didn't word that very well. I meant to say "I can see body image concerns still existing with socialist porn" -- I didn't mean to imply you personally had body image concerns.

                  Sexualization leads to objectification, which is inherently evil as it removes agency from someone

                  Say someone grows up in a socialist utopia. They want to do porn. They're not directly forced into it, and they're not forced into it by circumstance, either -- they're guaranteed a non-porn job and all the means of decent living. What agency are they losing by the fact porn exists?

                  Maybe they want to stop at some point, and they don't want their videos online anymore -- the agency-preserving answer there is to take their videos down (and if we can ban porn altogether, we can accomplish this). Maybe they don't want their time working in porn to be held against them in their next job -- if we can give workers full ownership and control over their workplaces, we can do this type of anti-discrimination stuff. I'd also imagine that interpersonal views on sex work would be less reactionary under socialism.

                  • Awoo [she/her]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 years ago

                    None of this works, it's functionally removed from the fact people will want to do it and the fact people will want to consume it. All of this only serves to push the content to a black market instead.

                    The correct approach is to understand that none of this is a problem that can be solved with prohibition and that it is far easier to soften the damage it does with strict regulation and control rather than prohibition which will just push it to an unregulated black market.

                    Regulated porn, control it 100x better than it currently is, do real age verifications, protect workers better. Then spend time and effort in society on the environmental issues that make porn such a problematic thing.

                    There needs to be a transition from a heavily problematic dodgy industry into an industry that's barely even wanted anymore by wider society. Complete prohibition isn't going to make it go away and it certainly isn't going to solve any problems for those working in the industry who will inevitably still have the same conditions in their lives that led them to working in it in the first place, they'll continue that work in the black market industry you create.

                    • ComradeBongwater [he/him]
                      ·
                      4 years ago

                      Porn, even without capitalist exploitation, can be harmful to how adolescents view sexual relationships and acts. I don't think there's a solution that can have success without quality, accessible education about sex being available from the early onset of puberty.

                      • Awoo [she/her]
                        ·
                        4 years ago

                        Sure. Regulating adolescent access should happen too. Requiring real age verification via credit card used to be common practice in the earlier internet until the entire industry switched to a simple "Are you over 18?" and literally nobody called them out for it.

                        I don't necessarily think "porn can be harmful to how adolescents view sexual acts" is a completed thought either though. Porn as is currently common is, porn with healthier perspectives on relationships however may be quite different. The issue I think is that porn currently just depicts a gratuitous sex act with no before/after and no concept of how that fits into a healthy relationship, this teaches children a very unhealthy perspective of the act. Not to mention the vast majority being deeply degrading to the women pictured. That's not to say that I think degradation porn shouldn't be a thing either though, people will still want it and have that kink for a long time until we identify the environmental factors creating it, but we should require kink-porn to have a healthy perspective of how that fits into a mutually trusting bdsm relationship.

                        Porn needs a ratings and regulatory board just like movies have but for the content of the porn itself.

        • Totalscrotalimplosio [he/him,any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Just fucking ban porn, and punish the people who exploit women.

          And men; honestly the entire industry is exploitative, just like the rest of the system.

  • Circra [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I mean kids getting most of their knowledge about sex from porn really is a problem. I'm failing to see how women are at fault here unless you just kinda wanna blame women for everything in the world. Including, at a guess going by this guy, not letting you date them.

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      I’m failing to see how women are at fault here unless you just kinda wanna blame women for everything in the world.

      It's an attack on OnlyFans usage which is itself an evolution of the anti-women "twitch thot" culture that surrounded the Twitch community in my opinion.

        • Awoo [she/her]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Pretty much. It's basically the same old "we demand to be able to police how women use their bodies".

          On Twitch it was "women need to cover up more, they're using their bodies for views".

          On OnlyFans it's "this entire thing is degenerate, women should be in the kitchen behaving themselves".

          They're all just white ISIS when it comes to their desired society for women.

      • Rem [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Making a culture where our bodies aren't seen as commodities is too difficult, so they're just blaming women who get money from that fact. It's like blaming Uber drivers for the US not having good public transit.

    • CarlTheRedditor [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      kids getting most of their knowledge about sex from porn

      Do we know if this is even occurring? "Most of"?

      • GrandAyatollaLenin [he/him,comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        I mean, if someone's watched porn and not had sex, watching porn is the closest they have to sexual experience.

        Sex Ed may teach the biology, risks, safety measures, etc. but rarely does it cover "how to get laid", "how to please a woman", "should I keep my socks on while doing it" etc.

        I think this is a natural and inevitable occurance. Even before porn, my knowledge of sex came from the very vulgar, explative-filled locker room talk which is obviously not reliable.

        Education is still important, and needs to be improved, but no one will know what sex is like until it happens.

        • prismaTK
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • EconomicCumflation [she/her]
            ·
            4 years ago

            Unless they have a sweet design like polar bears or Wallace and Gromit or something, probably not

      • Circra [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Not most kids, to clarify just that some kids are getting most sex ed from porn and that's not a good thing.

        Not all, but a significant amount of porn carries some rather unpleasent messages and undertones. It's not particularly healthy if that's your only or almost only source on what healthy sex is. It's going to lead to stuff like teenagers getting pressured into sexual activities they don't particuarly want but assume is what is expected of them. That's not good for anyone really.

        It'd be like people trying to learn how to hack mostly by watching 90's heist movies. Only difference is most people don't go on to try and hack stuff. Most people go on to at least want a sexual relationship.

  • Blurst_Of_Times [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Same guy, further down:

    One day this whole mess is gonna be gone. Degeneracy and godlessness is a shitty outcome, never ended well in the past. Thinking face

  • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I remember being a boy in 2005 and going "there's all this free porn on the internet, yet I cannot look at it because onlyfans girls don't exist yet."

  • regul [any]
    ·
    4 years ago

    none of y'all reading his bio noticing he's like a paid podcaster for BLOODY TOTTEN'M 'OTSPUR INNIT

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Do people think porn stars are self-employed? Do people think these porn stars, for some reason, get off on the idea of minors watching them? They have no control over who accesses their content.

    Even if you agree with his take on porn. Isn't blaming the porn stars for porn the same as blaming an extra in an R18 movie for the distributers decisions?

    • CarlTheRedditor [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      I think it boils down to him being angry that things like OnlyFans exists that give women some control and agency. There's more than one tweet here where he's clearly angry at the women here.

      https://twitter.com/lnvertedWinger/status/1368350502589698048?s=20

      Plus he probably thinks he'd be Jeff Bezos if only he hadn't typed "Riley Reid" into Bing when he was 14 or some shit. https://twitter.com/lnvertedWinger/status/1368374250906787841?s=20

      • ComradeBongwater [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Plus he probably thinks he’d be Jeff Bezos if only he hadn’t typed “Riley Reid” into Bing when he was 14 or some shit.

        To be fair, I often fantasize about how much time I could reclaim if I was never horny. Like if I jerk for like an hour a day (probs more), I'm spending literally 1/24th of my life stroking.

        • CarlTheRedditor [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          You're right, but now I'm wondering how long until the hyper-devoted NoFap weirdos try to make "asexual privilege" a thing

    • SerLava [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Do people think these porn stars, for some reason, get off on the idea of minors watching them?

      The only people this would ever apply to is YouTube almost-porn creators. Because you know there's only one type of person who would ever need to jerk off to poorly-produced awkward 80% nudity on a YouTube video labeled "how to make a sandwich" to get past the Youtube Kids filters - 12 year olds - the creators know they're making 100% of their money showing areola pixels to 12 year olds.

      So yeah posting to literally credit card locked OnlyFans is the polar opposite of that.

        • SerLava [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          There's some almost-porn layered on top of boomer entertainment, but I'm more talking about like, absolutely nothing happening besides someone bending over while peeling an apple, talking about how to peel an apple so that YouTube robots think that's what the video is.

            • SerLava [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              You're not wrong it's just, idk the idea of doing one of those videos is functionally equivalent to going on Nickelodeon and flashing the camera, then saying "hey kids, would you fuck me? You kids would totally fuck me right?"