Permanently Deleted

  • Straight_Depth [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    It's so cool that we have invented reverse sanctions that target the people living in your own country.

      • Straight_Depth [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        America is an empire built on sanctions. No sanctions, no empire. No empire, no sanctions. When the rest of the world has had enough of its shit, it turns the force of empire inward.

    • D61 [any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      ..so being poor wasn't enough, they just HAD to turn the screws just a little bit more...

      :screm:

      • Straight_Depth [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Empire runs on having a disposable army of suckers desperate or willing enough to do its bidding. When that supply runs out overseas it must seek them out within. When even that supply of suckers runs out, that's the point it will reverse every mechanism of oppression it has used and turn it on its own.

      • Straight_Depth [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        New York just put B&J on 90 day notice after which they'll be taken to court on the anti-BDS laws. I cannot fucking wait for this to be properly challenged in court because either way we win. Unless B&J/Unilever chicken out like the capitalist cowards they are.

        • ElGosso [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Florida and Texas are threatening Unilever with sanctions too

          • TankieTanuki [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            We will melt one pint of ice cream every hour, on the hour, until B&J complies.

        • notthenameiwant [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          The sad part is that NYC withdrawing their pension funds from apartheid South Africa was a tipping point in the 80s anti-apartheid struggle.

          • Straight_Depth [they/them]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Well think about it; Scenario A: Anti-BDS gets challenged in court - judge rules the entire concept grade-A "fukken stupid" and it falls apart. Scenario B: Judge upholds anti-BDS laws as legal - this will have huge long-term implications on future laws and I guarantee you this will make very many people extremely angry. It may coalesce into a more focused anti-Israeli movement. This will take longer than scenario A, but I love a good slow burn crisis for empire. Bonus; this will cost Unilever a shitton of money and I love billionaires losing lots of money. Scenario C: Unilever chickens out like the cucked little cowards they are. Anti-BDS stays, Unilever stays, the glorious status quo is upheld. Ironically, this is the worst outcome, but it's more or less where we are now, so fuck it, do or die.

            • BelovedOldFriend [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              I guarantee you this will make very many people extremely angry.

              This specifically is where I'm not optimistic. But I suppose it does depend on how hard they start to push similar laws for other things. If it's just Israel/BDS one-and-done, I think most people would just accept it. Hope I'm wrong.

        • Mardoniush [she/her]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Unilever could boycott any state that sues them and there'd be breadlines inside a week from the economic collapse. Capitalism seriously hasn't got the will it used to.

  • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Because this happens all the time. Lawmakers pass blatantly unconstitutional law, takes a while for it to go to court, make people suffer until the court shoots it down in at least a year. Then they do it again, because there's zero consequences for making unconstitutional laws.

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    lmao my employee handbook at work specifically says I'm not allowed to do anything against Israel, including boycotts, or they will report me to the police

    • pepe_silvia96 [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      jesus. I should cntrl+f my handbook before I bite the hand that feeds me.

  • bockwad [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    What if a state legislature passed an anti BDS of Cuba law? How could the courts strike it down without also striking out all of the other Anti BDS laws. :thonk:

  • sergiostweest [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    It triggers the last bit of patriotism I didn't know I still had. If we gotta live in a shithole it should at least be a sovereign shithole.

  • inshallah2 [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    But the US must protect the only democracy in the Middle East that's actually an apartheid state.

  • D61 [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    WWAAAHHHHTTT!!!... I"m only allowed to choose who I don't do business with if they're "teh gaayyee!!"??!!??

    :liz-society:

  • RowPin [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Don't they usually only apply to government contracts?