Trying really hard not to :jokerfication: but...

  • LeninWalksTheWorld [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    just two more senators bro. If I just get two more senators I will do all that based shit you keep dreaming about I swear bro. you just gotta give me two more senators and donate to my campaign bro. I swear bro you can count on me this time this is the most important election of our lifetime bro

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Here I am watching Sinema and Manchin bud, filling Senate seats in adjacent states.

    • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hey bro, I'm gonna need you to give me fifty bucks

      Again? You're alway asking for money

      Don't be like that bro, that's unfair, I gave you like twenty five last month

      Yeah, but you still owe me like five hundred!

  • Judge_Juche [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    It's so funny they said the exact same thing about the Georgia election not 2 years ago and they couldn't even get a $2000 cheque to everyone.

  • Ligma_Male [comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    where's that two clips of obama campaigning on this and then saying it's not a legislative priority?

  • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    You have the ability to do this, Brandon. Just say the words, and you can order a drone strike on every Republican lawmaker. Then the problem is instantly solved.

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    This has the same energy as someone begging the loan shark for another 10k that they'll totally pay back eventually.

  • Lurker123 [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Even if this were passed - which I seriously doubt - I just don’t see how SCOTUS wouldn’t strike this down.

    When Congress passes a law, it has to point to somewhere in the Constitution that gives it the authority to regulate in that area. Since the 40s though, this has been kind of a joke - Congress just points to the commerce clause and is able to pass whatever it wants. But, starting in the 90s, the conservative Supreme Court made it clear that it will not allow Congress to use the commerce clause to pass pro dem laws on culture war issues. This included issues surrounding guns near schools, violence against women act, and most recently with the Obamacare litigation, where the supreme court went out of its way to say that the individual mandate was not valid under the commerce clause (even though it was eventually held to be a valid law under congress’s authority to tax and spend).

    So it seems that any commerce clause route toward passing a national abortion law would be doomed to fail, and it’s not clear what other route Congress could really take.

    Of course, what this means we need to pack the court, but I doubt that’s what Biden meant.

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      There's a way Biden could get away with it without even going through congress: he drone strikes all the conservative justices and appoints progressive replacements. About equally likely, I think.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        It'd be legal, too. The courts decided that murdering people for political reasons is a "political question" that the courts can't rule on when al-Alwaki's father tried to sue Obama to keep Obama from murdering his son.

      • Lurker123 [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Well the replacement justices would still have to be approved by the Senate. That said, supposing he drone striked all the conservative justices, I have my doubts that the Senate would fail to confirm his nominees.

        • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Well the replacement justices would still have to be approved by the Senate.

          In the meantime, liberals would have the majority.

          That said, supposing he drone striked all the conservative justices, I have my doubts that the Senate would fail to confirm his nominees.

          Biden Crossing the Rubicon

      • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        He wouldn't even need to involve the military, just get the Sergeants at Arms to pick up the House Mace and do their fucking jobs

        Bust open some skulls on the floor of congress just like yhe founders intended

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I just don’t see how SCOTUS wouldn’t strike this down.

      I agree. However, I'd argue that setting legislative precedent gives blue judges in red states an excuse to say "Oops! Law is changed! Now I'm going to disregard Dobbs in my ruling." And then we get another pitched battle at the appellate courts that takes years to resolve. And, in the meantime, people don't die over this shit.

      So it seems that any commerce clause route toward passing a national abortion law would be doomed to fail, and it’s not clear what other route Congress could really take.

      The Privileges and Immunities Clause (aka Comity Clause) leaps to mind. That, combined with the 14th amendment and the Supremacy Clause. The Feds wouldn't be compelling private firms to provide abortion services. They'd be forbidding state governments from regulating abortion services or prosecuting abortion as a crime.

      Hell, a particularly bold federal judge could claim abortion is protected under the Comity Clause right now.

      • Lurker123 [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        What's the comity clause argument? We didn't study this much in my 14A class, and from what I remember from the bar prep courses, it was just "States can't treat citizens of other States differently than they treat citizens of their own State." I'm not seeing the applicability here - but again, very possible I'm not knowledgeable about how it works.

  • BolsheWitch [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is fucking depressing and almost makes me think Biden buys his own bullshit.

    honestly, this system is fucked up enough I could actually see it delivering a 70+ year old president who tries to idealistic play by the rules like this.

    :amerikkka:

    • Owl [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Prediction markets are all about this. They're illegal in the US though, so they haven't really taken off.

      If you want to do it with play money though, there's Manifold Markets.

    • ScotPilgrimVsTheLibs [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      :maybe-later-kiddo:: "Surely you don't believe the American people are that awful, do you? Of COURSE they'll voot bloo!"

      :chad-stalin:: "Ever checked out social media? Everyone laughed at the Buffalo massacre, the Christchurch Massacre, and giggle like first graders over how much they hate non-whites. Fuck Biden for even thinking democracy is the way to go in civilizing these savages."

    • CheGueBeara [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Prediction markets would be a great way for The Immortal Science to fund itself lol