I’m not even American, so it doesn’t affect me directly, but I am scared to death of a Trump presidency.

I am one of those people here who think that Biden is a far more competent executor of imperialist policies compared to Trump, but what I am even more afraid of is the early death of nascent left wing movements in America.

I am reminded of how the KPD getting its leaders murdered by Freikorps thugs during the Spartacist uprising (mind you, a much stronger party than any leftist movement in America today), and how its continued suppression paved the way to Nazi Germany.

Project 2025 will effectively embolden fascist thugs in America to do the same to the left wing movements, many of which are still in their cradle, and the death of leftist movements in their infancies will inevitably pave the way to a fascist America and undo many of the progress that had been made over decades.

The world cannot afford a fascist America. Imagine Hitler with nukes. The world will have to pay a much, much larger price as a result.

On this reasoning alone, I believe that Trump needs to be stopped at all cost. But many here have disagreed with me, and I need you to persuade me why I shouldn’t be afraid of Project 2025 at all. Even if the chance of that happening is 10%, I’m still not ready to gamble with it.

(I’m not saying we have to support Biden, I believe it is somewhat inevitable, I’m saying that we have to buy ourselves as much time as possible, even if it means strategic voting, to build a resilient leftist movement while delaying the inevitable for as long as we can.)

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Liberals aren't opposed to Project 2025.

    Have you heard a liberal plan for what they will do to prevent it once they have power? No of course you haven't. Simply having liberals in charge is all they care about, they have no intent to create policy to prevent or reduce its potential later.

    Project 2030 will happen if Project 2025 does not, because liberals are not actually opposed to it, they are simply using it as a tool to get votes.

    The democrats and the republicans are on the same team. They are tag teaming the working class into this outcome so that the working class does not pursue an option different to either of them. They are content with it happening either in 1 year or in 6 years. They don't mind either of these outcomes, as long as you and everyone else isn't fighting for a real opposition.

    • ziggurter [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They democrats and the republicans are on the same team. They are tag teaming the working class into this outcome so that the working class does not pursue an option different to either of them.

      Not only that, but the "ratchet" analogy people use is dead wrong, and it's dangerous that people keep using it. Biden has implemented a bunch of things Trump couldn't because courts, Democrats and their fans, and movements strenuously opposed him. The ratchet hasn't just "stopped" with Biden. It's advanced on slightly different fronts than liberals and the media want to pay attention to. The Democrats don't need to keep it from rolling back to the "left" because there's never any threat of it halting its "rightward" progress.

  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    3 months ago

    The world cannot afford a fascist America.

    The world has been living with one for a long time now. Way before Trump ever ran for office.

    • NewLeaf
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is just the part where white people are effected. The people who see this as a unique evil come from a position of privilege

      • Adkml [he/him]
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yup its just white people facing the negative consequences of our foreign policynfor a change.

  • Dolores [love/loves]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The world cannot afford a fascist America. Imagine Hitler with nukes

    we've had this since the 50's? it was not the character of the US regime that stopped the US from using nuclear weapons to enact a genocide, but a credible retaliatory threat from the Soviet Union.

    e: we actually have precedent for this, the literal Nazis produced a lot of but did not end up using chemical weapons because the allies also produced a large quantity & kept them in a state of readiness near the front to retaliate.

  • TraumaDumpling
    ·
    3 months ago

    you should be so scared of project 2025 that you question why the republican's only mainstream opponents don't treat them like the terrorists they are, and instead constantly call for bipartisanship and adopt their policies as their own to compete for the title of 'Most Racist'.

      • TraumaDumpling
        ·
        3 months ago

        lathe time: even if Genocide Joe wins the election, the democrats will invite Trump to assume the presidency (or some other office of power like the Parliamentarian) using some kind of domestic unrest or geopolitical event as pretext

        first as tragedy and all that

        • ziggurter [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          3 months ago

          It's be a good Onion bit maybe, but I think the Democrats will keep milking Trump as the devil incarnate until the end of time. They don't need him to implement the fascism. They're more than capable of doing it on their own. In fact, they get far less opposition that way.

        • shroobinator@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          3 months ago

          They already brought Trump in to work on the border bill.

          https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-biden-collide-split-screen-trips-border-immigration-spotlight-rcna140899

    • NewLeaf
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I see so much handwringing about stuff like project 2025 but less than zero pushback. Either they don't actually believe it's dangerous or they're lazy.

      Even OP says trump must be stopped at all costs, but the party that is supposed to be doing that, are shutting down any effective protest and siding with the fascists at every turn. What do these people even mean by "any means necessary"?

      It reminds me of George Bush's "project for a new American century". No pushback, and our lives became worse because of it.

      • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        3 months ago

        The same as they mean when they say that occupied people are allowed to resist their oppressor by any means possible – quietly and ineffectually, by any means that will not rock the boat but which will signal their virtue.

      • Adkml [he/him]
        ·
        3 months ago

        They need to stop Trump by any means necessary.

        Except stopping giving bombs to Isreal, or doing anything about workers protections, or doing anything about the environment, or giving people stimulus money, or vocally supporting abortion rights, universal Healthcare, insider trading ban, election finance reform, breaking up monopolies, opposing the police state....

        Basically they're willing to have YOU do whatever is necessary to stop Trump.

        • NewLeaf
          ·
          3 months ago

          Protesting isn't allowed.

          Haranguing them in public isn't allowed.

          General strikes, hell, normal strikes aren't allowed.

          Protest voting in midterms isn't allowed.

          The only thing you can do is vote for who they tell you to

  • coeliacmccarthy [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Because it's effectively already happened. The judiciary is fully illegitimate and holds dictatorial power; whether it wields that power now or in two years or in four years barely matters since nothing we can do will prevent it. You can put all your energy into the unfixably broken electoral system in order to barely slow the rot, thereby legitimizing that system, or you can accept now that America is DEAD and begin acting accordingly.

    • sovietknuckles [they/them]
      ·
      3 months ago

      or you can accept now that America is DEAD and begin acting accordingly.

      Act accordingly how?

      • coeliacmccarthy [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That's up to you to answer, fam. Depends on where you are and the conditions there, as well as your own ideology and your material/class/social conditions.

          • coeliacmccarthy [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I am developing a self-sustaining eco-socialist community in rural Montana. This is only possible because I was lucky enough to have a friend who sold me property cheaply and then to come into enough of an inheritance to pay it off. Your mileage will absolutely vary.

        • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is my first thought as well. I have plenty of fairly close relatives in the USA, and if there was some viable method other than, like, them flying here and then refusing to leave — I would see that every single one of them would be moved here.

  • Egon [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    A vote for Biden is approval of Biden, it legitimises him.
    Biden is committing genocide. Voting for him legitimises genocide, it trivializes and normalises it. From this point on, if Biden wins, Dems will only get more brutal. A democratic party that knows people don't even give a shit about mass murder, will be completely unhinged.

    On the other hand you have project 2025, which the Dems have no plans of averting, and a platform that is more or less already being implemented. There is no left-wing movements threatening the state. There were left-wing movements under Trump, because he was reprehensible even to the liberals. The next republican won't be.

    The Freikorps operated with the blessing of the SPD. In this analogy of yours, the democrats are the SPD. Giving the SPD legitimacy that they could then give the Freikorps was not a good thing.

    Finally: whatever it is you think should be done, must be done now. We do not have the luxury of time. We do not have a few more years. The collapsing climate does not allow us to just extend time another election cycle. We cannot wait for a better presidential election.

    • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
      ·
      3 months ago

      You're misrepresenting the meaning of a vote in the general election of a first past the past voting system to select electors who will cast votes later after the result is certified.

      If we're being really casual, sure, it's "approval." But what it really is is a selection of the best option out of what is available.

      When the votes are tallied and the Electoral College outcome is finalized, it will either be President Biden getting ready for another four years or President Elect Trump getting ready to take office.

      So our only choice here is between a bad four more years of Biden doing some good things because he wants to and some when he has no other choice, or a disastrous four years of Trump doing as many terrible things as possible as fast as possible, almost certainly ending our way of government.

      We don't have the "luxury" of time but we have to live in the reality of time. Time is something we can't work around. It takes time to organize, time to work within whatever system(s) we're in, time to convince others to join us, ...

      Whatever damage we do to the climate becomes more and more difficult to reverse, major and more difficult to adapt to, affects more and more people, as time goes on. But we have to plan for working in that scenario because we still don't have the numbers of people on our side.

      I'm not arguing that we should "wait," either. We've seen that Biden can change his mind and change course. We need to work with that, get more progressives and liberals and Democrats elected from medical examiner to dog catcher to school board to state government to federal. And push them left every time. More unions. More corporate regulation. A four day work week with no reduction in pay, or five 6.5-hour days. Universal basic income. Lower the Medicare eligibility age by five years every 2 years until we have Medicare for all. End all fossil fuel subsidies, and transfer 75% of the subsidies to renewables and the other 25% to next gen power research. Give every worker a minimum of 3 weeks paid vacation and 6 months of parental leave. Provide for end of life care. Make abortion legal safe and rare and decided upon by the pregnant person and their doctor. On and on and on.

      On foreign policy, basically support actual freedom and oppose oppression. (Not 1960s Cold War "support capitalism" CIA bullshit.)

      We can take steps toward that with Joe Biden as president. Not as fast as you or I would want. But we'll get none of that, and probably the opposite of some of it, if Trump is elected.

      • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        3 months ago

        We can take steps toward that with Joe Biden as president. Not as fast as you or I would want. But we'll get none of that, and probably the opposite of some of it, if Trump is elected.

        How? If anything I'd argue the exact opposite

        Democratic politicians in blue states may actually make a few half assed attempts at protecting marginalized people if they have Trump to force their hands into opposing him while with Genocide Joe in office red states will still implement project 2025 unimpeded and the libs will suck so hard at messaging as usual that chuds may even manage to take over a blue state

      • itappearsthat [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        coming around with "pushing the dems left" rhetoric after four years where that specific tactic did jack shit fuck

        I hope you didn't waste time typing all that garbage from scratch personally instead of just copying & pasting it from somewhere.

      • half_giraffe [comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Biden has been president for 4 years. Can you give me exactly one (1) thing that he's done for the left in that time period?

          • half_giraffe [comrade/them]
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lol was this before or after he crushed the rail workers strike? Pretty funny that the most "left" thing you can attribute to Biden is performative bullshit while he has actively worked on behalf of capital to limit workers' actions. What level of "left" does that make him?

            • FunkyStuff [he/him]
              ·
              3 months ago

              Right before. And libs excused it by saying "but they got their demands!!" as if the point of labor organizing is to get some benefits and a wage hike ONCE then have it be illegal for the rest of time.

              • ziggurter [he/him, comrade/them]
                ·
                3 months ago

                And they didn't get their demands, either. They got some shitty, watered down, pathetic version of their demands that the Biden administration and the boss-friendly union "leadership" told them they should be happy with.

              • itappearsthat [he/him]
                ·
                3 months ago

                "The workers must emancipate themselves beg for table scraps from the government"

                • Karl Marx
              • Adkml [he/him]
                ·
                3 months ago

                "But 4 months later they got 90% of their demands"

                Damn seems like a huge fucking waste of 4 months considering it was going to happen anyway, oh and look that 10% was all the health and safety stiff they went on strike for in the first place.

              • Nakoichi [they/them]
                ·
                3 months ago

                Go back to reddit you smug piece of shit liberal. That isn't even what "moving the goalposts" is you stupid fuck.

              • FunkyStuff [he/him]
                ·
                3 months ago

                Did you also call it moving the goalposts when feminist groups said "Not like that!" as your psychotic politicians used their rhetoric to justify imperialist wars?

                Show

                Because that's all Genocide Joe is doing, but with labor organizing instead of feminism.

      • Egon [they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        A vote for someone is approval of them. It legitimises them. We're not being casual, that's just what a vote is.

        You are voting for your representative. Your vote signals approval of said representative. Or does Biden come to your house after you've voted for him, to ask you "hey Jack, what kind of vote was it you gave me? Do you support me a lot or just kind of?" biden-alert
        Voting legitimises the government. The US has, time and again, used the fact that it's government is elected (never mind the fact that voter participation is low and popular vote doesn't matter) to impose it's will on countries which has "wrong democracies".

        I stopped reading after your first two blocks of text, because it's clear you're just doing handwringing and semantics wrapped with some slight condescention. I'm not interested in simple rhetorical debatebroisms, and I'm not interested in your lib-cliches of pretending to acknowledge issues only to then trivialise and ignore them, whilst completely misunderstanding what is actually being said. Misunderstanding being the charitable interpretation.

        I'm sure the rest of the text is you speaking about the climate in some dumbass manner and saying some dumb bullshit about how Biden "at least lets us work with him" or whatever. Probably something akin to "sure it's not as fast as you'd want, but at least it's something". The world is going to burn and you will sit in the rubble wondering what happened. I'll bet 5$ that you say some variation of "we can work on pushing Biden left" jotaro-walk

        It's clear you have no concept of how political power is wielded.

          • Egon [they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Stairway to purity

            aaaand I stopped reading. If you think "not supporting genocide" is a purity test, then you're fucked in the head. Go vote for genocide, but don't pretend like you give a shit.

            Another reason not read your drivel: You do not meaningfully engage with the arguments presented to you.
            You do shit like this:

            Maybe we can agree that a vote in our current system means "I approve of this alternative over the others."

            Once again ignoring the explanation for why your vote signifies approval. Not engaging with the arguments why. This makes it clear you wish to grandstand and condescend. If you wonder why you're being treated with derision, it is because you yourself began this interaction with a thick veneer of smugness. Therefore I and others treat you in the same way. You do not understand basic political mechanics, you do not comprehend basic reasoning presented to you, you are not interested in engaging with thoughts that are challenging your worldview, you are merely repeating the same tired lines again and again, hidden behind a facade of comradely understanding/engagement as a poor rhetorical trick to undermine those you disagree with. Fuck off back to reddit where this tired shtick isn't as obvious.

            I do not wish to repeat myself, you are well aware why you are wrong on this point, as the material reality does not care for how you feel about the candidate. I don't give a shit about what you feel your vote means, I care about what it does.
            The candidate will use your vote as an argument for legitimisation. I have said this twice already. You are clearly not interested in anything but soapboxing.

            Go clap for Kamala Harris and Joe "pro-bussing" "Strom Thurmond Eulogizer" "Crime Bill advocate" "mass fracker" "Tara Reade redacted" "Union Breaker" "Mass Genocider" "Abortion Banner" "Trans People Can Get Persecuted I Won't Care" Biden continues to deport more people than Trump.

          • idkmybffjoeysteel [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Biden is probably the most left wing President since Carter. That's not saying much in a center right country, but that's where we are today.

            Jesus Christ. Also, center right? Relative to whom, Saudi Arabia?

            That's the American Left as it stands today. That's what we can pull on to drag the Overton Window's left edge farther open.

            My brother how in the hell do you think the Overton window shifted to the right in the first place? It was because of tepid endorsement of ever more right wing political parties, because at least they're not as bad as the other guy hyuck

            To the extent that thanks is owed to small dollar working and lower class people, to thousands of door knockers and surrogates, that power will be used to their benefit.

            I could understand believing this if you lived in Cuba or Vietnam or China but you have the evidence of your own experience and you are just choosing to ignore it for reasons, idk what they are, vibes?

            Although I'm guessing the next step on this stairway to purity is to complain that a vote for Biden is approval of everything the Democratic Party has ever done (and on and on) because the foundational motivation here is to feel superior without having to participate in real life politics.

            You know what, actually yes, hold people accountable for the crimes of the past, so that you don't just blindly believe them when they tell you things will be different now (and even when they don't)

            Maybe we can agree that a vote in our current system means "I approve of this alternative over the others."

            Excellent point, this is why you should still make limited use of the electoral system to vote third party

          • iie [they/them, he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            a vote in our current system means "I approve of this alternative over the others"

            Almost, but not quite.

            What a vote actually means is "I prefer the result I expect from this vote over the result I expect from the other vote."

            If withholding your vote this time means they offer more next time, that's a result you might want. On the other hand, if you always vote blue as long as you slightly prefer the democrats, you give the democrats permission to move to the right, slightly behind the republicans, indefinitely.

            in practice, though, they'll always find some way to gin up votes without offering substance. that's their whole job. shrug-outta-hecks

            Political power is wielded by those who hold office, thanks to the people who got them into office. When that is a handful of billionaires and will connected political operatives, that power is used to their benefit. To the extent that thanks is owed to small dollar working and lower class people, to thousands of door knockers and surrogates, that power will be used to their benefit.

            This is not true in the slightest.

            Why would it be? The Democrats only need to be slightly less bad than the Republicans, and your vote is guaranteed.

            And it requires that we acknowledge that we approve of what the American Left has done more than the alternative.

            1. Democrats are not the American Left.

            2. What have the Democrats actually done?

            The policies of the Democratic party are bought by corporate interests. The material interests of a corporation run directly counter to those of a worker. Workers want higher wages, companies want lower. Workers want public healthcare, insurance companies want private. Workers want less war, the MIC wants more. Workers want lower housing costs, hedge funds and landlords want higher. Who do the Democrats side with? What direction is America headed in?

            Is this a democracy or a good-cop bad-cop routine?

          • Adkml [he/him]
            ·
            3 months ago

            No, you can wrote as many paragraphs as you want to try to define how voting for somebody isn't supporting them but it's obvious bullshit.

            Maybe you can manage to convince yourself but "just because I used my vote to say this is my choice for who should be president doesn't mean I think they should be president" is going to continue to fall on its face here.

          • blashork [she/her]M
            ·
            3 months ago

            Political power is wielded by those who hold office

            Political power grows out the barrel of a gun. Aiming mine at you

      • idkmybffjoeysteel [he/him]
        ·
        3 months ago

        I didn't read everything you had to say because who has the time for that, but wanted to respond to one thing that you said:

        Whether or not you feel your vote is an endorsement, they will throw it in your face and treat it as though it is, without nuance. It is mentally excruciating to be told by political leaders YOU WANT THIS, YOU VOTED FOR US, as they carry out their most unhinged plans.

        I am sure it has been like this forever, but never more blatant than in the last decade in the UK, with the most pathetic leadership on all fronts falling back on statements like this because they know they have no credibility.

  • RaisedFistJoker [she/her]
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine Hitler with nukes

    The american empire is already commiting a mechanised genocide, this is already happening right now. It is shockingly naive to believe after all we've seen that liberals and the majority of american people (including all thier client states) arent fascist nazis right now.

  • AutomatedPossum [she/her]
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am reminded of how the KPD getting its leaders murdered by Freikorps thugs during the Spartacist uprising

    These Freikorps thugs were sent by the SPD. It's in the interest of both liberals and conservatives to fight leftists, both liberalism and conservatism are rightwing, capitalist, imperialist and deeply chauvinist ideologies, one is just more focussed on hegemonial control and the other more on open violence. You cannot fight for queer liberation, or the rights of any other marginalized group such as America's black community, immigrants or indigenous peoples, with Bidenite Democrats, the last 4 years with its constant onslaught of anti-queer and especially anti-trans legislation (and also the uninterrupted continuation of an ever brutalizing border regime and the steady increase of police militarization) have proven this. The only Democrat opposition to trans genocide we've seen in that timeframe has been on the state level, by individual actors, the Democrats as a federal-level institution are downright scared of being too openly supportive of trans rights, Clinton as a prototypical member of the DNC establishment has more or less stated that she views our rights as a fringe issue that poses a political liability and Biden has only started voicing support for trans people when election season went into full swing.

    I'm not telling Americans not to vote for Biden in November, i honestly may do so if i was Amerikan, but i'd probably do so by mail-in ballot from abroad because if i would live in Amerika, my top priority would be to get the fuck out. These are the reasonable options for US trans people, either leaving the country or work on community organizing and prepare for mass civil unrest, because mass civil unrest is the only thing that will stop the clericofascist mob. Biden won't do that, or he would have put more effort into clamping down on a movement that tried a coup and wanted to murder leading members of his party when he got into office. He's too comfortable with fascism to actually stop it, and he doesn't even meaningfully stall it.

    So yes, i'm worried about the trans-exterminationist agenda of the US far right, it's a main political concern of mine because it directly affects my life even here in Europe that Reaganite nazi orgs like the Heritage Foundation are actively financing and supporting anti-trans activism here. But none of this has gotten better under Biden, and he will not change that, because he needs a continued threat to marginalized people to browbeat them into voting for him. Democrats are not allies. All they have to offer is a false sense of safety, the illusion that you can vote yourself out of the existential threat that Republicans already pose. You can't. You can try stalling for four more years, sure, but has that stalling actually worked in the last 4? And even if Biden wins the election, will he be able to govern afterwards or will there be another coup attempt that may work better this time?

    When you focus on electoralism as the core strategy, you're playing the wrong game. There is no safe option to vote for trans rights in the US. The American left needs to prepare for worst case scenarios instead of putting its hopes in an eroding system that never was designed to serve their interests in the first place. There needs to be real thought put into all possible outcomes, what to do under another Biden term, what to do when Trump gets elected and what to do when he steals the election, and all of these scenarios are dire for trans people and require strategies that lie outside electoral politics.

    • assyrian
      ·
      3 months ago

      I'm not telling Americans not to vote for Biden in November, i honestly may do so if i was Amerikan, but i'd probably do so by mail-in ballot from abroad because if i would live in Amerika, my top priority would be to get the fuck out.

      where would you go?

      • AutomatedPossum [she/her]
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ireland probably, but it's a tough call, the situation for trans people isn't exactly ideal anywhere.

        • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Thailand seems like a decent choice if you can make it there

          They were ahead of the curve on trans rights for long before the western libs started pretending to care and their new pro LGBT law is almost as based as Cuba's

          The fact that it's a tropical paradise with some of the best cuisine in the world is just bonus

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I'm not telling Americans not to vote for Biden in November, i honestly may do so if i was Amerikan, but i'd probably do so by mail-in ballot from abroad because if i would live in Amerika, my top priority would be to get the fuck out.

      This is absolutely true because of climate change alone, if you're in any way selfish we must admit we lost, we already lost a long time ago, its only up to how we cope and make things a little bit better. If you can move abroad there are better options and if you absolutely must stay in NA then be concious that the choices you make now are choices you're going to regreat even 10 years from now not 25 not 50 years like we previously thought back in 2000s. Though I guess nobody realizes its been 25 years already and nothing was done since the early 2000's climate treaties etc. We are halfway there already. Scary isn't it?

      2023-24 will smash temperature records, it will prove the models are all wrong, nothing will be done and everything happening in Gaza will repeated in the US. People are still traumatized by how the west doesn't care about COVID anymore too.

      Make absolutely no mistake liberals would not cry one bit if government troops start shooting at chuds looking for aid relief after [insert newest unprecedented hurricane/storm here], all it would take is a premise and an excuse. "Oh they were rebelling actualy so its good" and vice versa.

      In that context whatever party is at the helm will make little difference 10-15 years from now IMO.

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well as a minority living in America I'm more terrified of the dems normalizing genocide, normalizing the repression of activist groups and charging them thru RICO, normalizing anti immigrant sentiment by surpassing Trump's deportation numbers and making his border laws more repressive

    Somehow that shit seems a little more relevant to me than some hypothetical about Republicans fucking up already fucked up courts, taxing poor people more and shuttering an already half shuttered department of education

    If Genocide is already normalized wtf do I have to fear anymore? WHY SHOULD I BE SCARED when I've already witnessed more death and depravity these last six months than I can handle for a lifetime

  • xj9 [they/them, she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You should be afraid of Project 2025, but also recognize that Biden isn't going to stop it. He isn't doing anything to materially oppose fascism, what makes you think that would change if he beats Trump? We did the harm reduction election and now we're in the middle of a genocide and the Democrats are not really getting pushed left at all.

  • DengistDonnieDarko [none/use name]
    ·
    3 months ago

    What is to stop them from implementing these plans with Biden in office anyways? He's proven that he won't step up to stop right wing legislation anyways. I highly doubt the color of the presidents tie makes much of a difference here.

    • Adkml [he/him]
      ·
      3 months ago

      This.

      If dems win the project will still happen but libs will just call you a rpeublican when you ask why they aren't doing anything.

  • tamagotchicowboy [he/him]
    ·
    3 months ago

    It will happen no matter what, one party openly champions it and speaks harshly, the other does so by inaction and once in a while throws some nice words. The US already walked off the cliff so to speak, the lurching feeling of the fall just hasn't caught up to some yet. There's so many ways to keep movements down.

    • aaro [they/them]
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, one party will start the killing now and one will start the killing a little later. Is there not a clear less bad pick?

        • aaro [they/them]
          ·
          3 months ago

          Obviously when treading in this discussion, it is necessary to genuflect and state that Biden and his entire cabinet would see [redacted] under any ethical system of government

          but playing with this logic a little bit, wasn't 1% of Hitler about a hundred thousand dead? Naturally if I say I have a preference, people will assume that I think that voteing and doing nothing else politically ever is the ideal leftist strategy, but like, if it's just bubbling in a bubble and then getting back to the orgs, is there a reason that 99% Hitler and 100% Hitler have no meaningful differences, even if that ratio is correct?

          • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well I think if you're going to engage in this kind of thing, then the comparison can't be done in a vacuum. What happens if Biden is re-elected? Almost certainly in 2028 a Republican will win. I don't think Trump will be able or willing to run in 2028, which means it's probably going to be a Republican other than Trump. So, is it better to vote for 99% Hitler now to prevent 100% Hitler from being elected in 2024, knowing that there's a very strong chance that in 2028 110% Hitler will be elected? Is it better to have 100% Hitler in 2024, expecting that another 99% Hitler would win in 2028 rather than 110% Hitler?

            Beyond that, if you vote for a genocider you're setting the precedent that the DNC doesn't need to worry about whether genocide affects elections. The DNC should lose this race based on the genocide they have perpetrated alone.

      • tamagotchicowboy [he/him]
        ·
        3 months ago

        The issue of seeing these things as static points rather than a process already live, we're already guaranteed killing, there has been killing, there will be more killing no matter which one, one will just have more open optics and bad aesthetics for libs, the other the illusion of status quo and pretty words to give the pampered an illusion of progress. You could remove all the 'one party', even the fried fish sammich fan, but the conditions that created these individuals are still out in the world unsettled, so its like digging a small hole at the beach, it will just immediately fill with more sand.

      • OrionsMask [he/him,any]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        'Start' killing whom? Because the Democrats are already killing Palestinians as we speak.

        • VILenin [he/him]M
          ·
          3 months ago

          If it isn’t me it might as well not be happening!

      • Egon [they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Both parties start the killing at the same time, one is just more enthusiastic about it. Bidens border policy is worse than the previous one, he's put more kids in cages, deported more and given more money to the cops. I struggle to think of a measure where he does less than the previous administration. Pretending like it's "stagnation or murder" rather than "murder or murder" is folly.

        On top of that voting for Biden is once again legitimising the "vote for the lesser evil" ideology that had brought us to this point. Every election the lesser evil takes the position of the evil of the previous election. Now "the lesser evil" is commiting genocide. Voting for Biden legitimises genocide, makes it so that's no longer a step too far. What do you think the democrats will do, if they get elected on a platform of "we don't care about genocide"?

      • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]
        ·
        3 months ago

        One party is currently murdering people in droves in Palestine. Nobody with a soul could possibly vote for Joe Biden.