• Mindfury [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    DO NOT ASK ABOUT THE CHEMICAL TRAIN

    WE HAVE RELEASED ANOTHER BALOON

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Imagine if a spokesman for the Pentagon is giving a press briefing.

      "As it has been repeatedly said - these Cessna-like objects—"

      A young, green reporter doesn't follow well-established Pentagon press conference protocol and blurts out: "Excuse me! Cessna-like?!?"

      "I... I misspoke. These cylinder-like..." He clears his throat. "These cylindrical objects"

      "I must interrupt. Were any of 'objects' shot down small aircraft?"

      Try as he might the spokesman can't help sounding like a guilty little kid who let the cat out of the bag. "The most recent three objects are cylindrical. Therefore they were not small aircraft..."

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        ...Cessnas are kinda cylindrical when you ignore the wings. Actually all planes are.

        • ProfessorAdonisCnut [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not all. Some planes are nothing like a cylinder, e.g.: P-38 lightning, Vought XF5U, Convair XFY-1 Pogo, F-117

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    It is your communist duty to deploy a weather balloon wherever you are, just to fuck with the state.

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think there just might be multiple weather balloons all got lost and now they're blowing in haphazardly.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Someone needs to spread a rumor that Norfolk Southern is a Chinese company

  • ssjmarx [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    My theory that this whole thing is just to give bored pilots something to do seems more possible every day.

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I'm guessing half of these are migrating geese, the other half are probably experimental polar bear flying machines.

      • Antoine_St_Hexubeary [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’m guessing half of these are migrating geese

        Oh snap, what if there's a strain of bird flu that's so virulent that shooting down birds with missiles is the only safe way to handle it?

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
    ·
    2 years ago

    (lobbyist whispering to press liaison)

    "Make sure they mention exactly what brands of weapons they used"

  • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    All fighter pilots born after 1992 can't dog fight, all they know is never guns machine guns, fire sidewinder missile, no maneuvers, charge they phone, and lie.

    • Weedian [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      More like all pilots post ww2. Top gun was invented because the pilots forgot how airplane combat worked once they got jets and kept getting shot down by soviet jets

      Oh i have superieor thrust and could dictate the fight by always having more energy? Na ill just turn horizontally and bleed all my speed leaving me vulnerable to the more manuverable aircraft.

  • NoamParenti [they/them]
    cake
    ·
    2 years ago

    What a clown theater. Surely this is just to create a distraction from the Nord Stream topic, right?

  • Bloobish [comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    20 bucks most of these are highschool and college mini weather balloon projects

    • Wildgrapes [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      That'd be so funny. We scrambled fighter jets and fired missiles because at the cost of atleast tens of thousands of dollars because Jaxon is trying to get into MIT

      • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        at the cost of atleast tens of thousands of dollars

        Think an order of magnitude or two higher. A single Raytheon AIM-9 Sidewinder costs $400,000. Flight time for a Lockheed Martin F-16 costs about $400 a minute to operate, and its annual maintenance costs are about $10,000,000.

    • build_a_bear_group [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am almost certain that is the case. I was in an undergrad science club that wanted to send up an atmospheric balloon for fun, but didn't get the money together to do it. And had a family member work at Raven, which made/makes (recently acquired and being sold off for parts to other engineering firms) all of the US's high altitude balloons. There are so many "citizen-scientists" that send up balloons without directly notifying the government that shooting down high-altitude objects will more directly affect Bob from Kansas's film project than hidden Chinese spy missions.

    • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      if an F-16 is shooting them down, theyd have to be pretty high up, which would maybe require FAA clearance?

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is like the reverse of when the US would send objects to Cuba to trigger their Soviet air defense radars, to figure out how to build aircraft that could fly over there undetected. But now it's China probing the US defences. And the US has figured out how to reliably track these objects now. At least that's what I think.

    But with every object shot down, China learns more about how the US air defense and fighter planes work. And if the objects don't get shot down, well China knows that they've evaded detection by the US. A win win situation for China, if you put diplomacy aside.

    In essence, during the early 1960s, the CIA launched radar reflectors on balloons off Cuba's coastline via a U.S. Navy submarine and employed an electronic warfare system called PALLADIUM that would trick the latest Soviet radar systems into showing their operators that enemy aircraft were rushing toward Cuban shores or doing all types of crazy maneuvers. This coaxed the Cuban air defense system and its radars to light up and spurred rapid communications between air defenders on the island.

    The balloon-borne radar reflectors of different sizes also showed up on the Soviet radars, and by monitoring the targets that the radar operators concentrated on, and thus could detect, it was determined how sensitive their Soviet radar systems actually were.

    From an article written during 2021

    Would be incredibly funny if China is using 1960s CIA ops against the USA lol

    • emizeko [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it's stupider than that and they just went off course

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, this lines up with actual serious weather events. I think the bigger play is the US increasing "preparedness" and previously ignored civilian incursions are now triggering interceptions.

        Also all these pilots are finally on clearance to go live and are finding any excuse to shoot shit that they can.

        • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]
          ·
          2 years ago

          How long until some retired engineer just cruising around in a home-made gyrocopter gets shot down?

          Or a sidewinder misses the balloon and decides to target a civilian plane?