Source book:
Stalinist values by David hoffmann.
Other parts of the chapter basically says the time and energy wasted on individualist bourgeois bustin decadence is time better spent learning to work for the better of the collective.
TL:DR - Nutting is counter-revolutionary. :volcel-vanguard: .
This seems like a genuine all sides thing. Libs will couch everything in neoliberal word salad, leftists will do what you describe (including saying everything is "neoliberal"), to your standard crank Republicans every criticism must use "woke" now, and your open fascists classically attribute everything to Jewish people.
Now you can probably go by degree to see who's sanest, but tying your immediate criticism to a larger political product happens all over the place.
Hexbear isn't known for being good at marxist theory and there was a wide variety of people and thoughts in the USSR, many positive before de-stalinization.
“such and such was a bourgeois idealist reactionary who rejected objective scientific materialism and only gained popularity because of his inherently anti-revolutionary ideas’
hexbear.com ripping off the Stalinist anti-imperialist valor of /r/Chapotraphouse
there’s no real engagement with the subject matter
lol ok Jordan Peterson
Not even socialism is immunized from "it was revealed to me in a dream" style social theory writing.
are they suggesting orgies are NOT counter revolutionary, because it'd be the collectivist orgasms instead
Not in the slightest. Just talking about Soviet Ls we can probably agree on, like that Lysenkoism doesn't work or that homosexuality is not bourgeois.
an oldie but a goldie:
Why Women Had Better Sex Under Socialism
wow it's a book now too let's go Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism
Ursula Le Guin 🤝 Soviet Union 🤝 :volcel-police:
His efforts to break out of his essential seclusion were, in fact, a failure, and he knew it. He made no close friend. He copulated with a number of girls, but copulation was not the joy it ought to be. It was a mere relief of need, like evacuating, and he felt ashamed of it afterward because it involved another person as object. Masturbation was preferable, the suitable course for a man like himself. Solitude was his fate; he was trapped in his heredity. She had said it: “The work comes first.” Rulag had said it calmly, stating fact, powerless to change it, to break out of her cold cell. So it was with him. His heart yearned towards them, the kindly young souls who called him brother, but he could not reach them, nor they him. He was bora to be alone, a damned cold intellectual, an egoist.
How do I get the power to call people losers while making it sound like theory.
just throw out some lefty sounding word salad and weirdos will lap it up
Maybe I can rely on my trusted inappropriate reference to material conditions.
Why did I bring donuts to the committee meeting? Material conditions.
Why is your opinion the dumbest thing I've ever heard? Material conditions.
Lenin was an expert at it, but it was actually theory
The truest path to revolution is by upgrading your shitposts until they are canonized as books of theory.
shy loners imprisoned in themselves
Didn't have to call me out like that. Damn.
