Permanently Deleted

  • makotech222 [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Inline images temporarily disabled

    edit: make sure to clear your cache if they still pop up

    • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      you can't spam the screen with giant yakuza memes that take up the entire screen anymore

      hasan-smash

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Show posad

        This is kinda what I meant about how the emotes work now.

        Show posad

        At least it only works with local images, that way we can purge the images from the database and break all the comments at once instead of having to hunt down the comments

        Edit: they fixed it!

    • ImOnADiet
      ·
      2 years ago

      ty! was really annoying and gross

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thank you! I'm sorry this created extra work for y'all right after the transition.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Any account could also do this with posts too though.

    I continue to not think it's an issue, just ban them. Perhaps as a precautionary measure comments could be collapsed if reported.

    The site should categorically not overreact to attackers like this or it will see other forms of attack aiming to get the site to become more and more isolated/changed from the traditional Lemmy.

    EDIT: Simple solution is the same solution that worked for forums for decades before reddit took over. Require new accounts to reach a certain post count first before getting image posting, and rate limit their posting.

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      The site should categorically not overreact to attackers like this or it will see other forms of attack aiming to get the site to become more and more isolated/changed from the traditional Lemmy.

      it's not a reaction if i never wanted inline images in comments and thought they were bad before any wrecking attempts angery

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I continue to not think it's an issue, just ban them.

      I don't want to have nightmares for weeks because I opened a post with a shock image before the mods could get it, thank you very much.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        There is absolutely nothing stopping that from happening with posts, and was nothing stopping it happening previously with posts for 3 years. Nothing about posts has changed?

    • abc [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      undefined> The site should categorically not overreact to attackers like this or it will see other forms of attack aiming to get the site to become more and more isolated/changed from the traditional Lemmy.

      this goes for so much stuff lol, namely:

      • federation
      • beehaw
      • wreckers in general
      • reddit shit
      • etc
    • Grebgreb [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Simple solution is the same solution that worked for forums for decades before reddit took over. Require new accounts to reach a certain post count first before getting image posting, and rate limit their posting.

      At the very least, we should require this along with a threshold of points mentioned in other posts. Images should also be locked to a certain size and at the very least an option to auto-hide them should be added.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I agree with sizelocking. Set a maximum width using css and they'll get resized to it without proportions being busted.

        The main problem in my opinion is that the gifs were getting turned into full post-width videos that I think everyone will agree was absurdly large. The rest seemed fine. But now that people have been annoyed by the post-width videos this troll has decided to be disgusting in order to get their way. It's almost certainly an existing member that wants the feature removed rather than any external attacker and they can fuck right off with that behaviour imo.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, I'm siding towards this being an overreaction although I don't care enough either way. People can already abuse their avatar and banner. Like, nothing stopped people from posting scat in old Hexbear.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I'm siding towards this being an overreaction

        Are you unfamiliar with shock images as a means of attack? There's some truly horrific stuff out there that I'm trying not to picture in my mind while writing this but that's not working very well so I'm leaving this thread.

        • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          And my point is that those shock images can be someone's avatar and banner or even just some post. Nothing's stopping someone from posting snuff in /c/videos.

    • joaomarrom [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Any account could also do this with posts too though.

      sure, but the images in posts are collapsed by default and you don't get slammed with them as you're browsing comments... besides, they're much smaller>>

    • aaro [they/them, she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You have a good point with the posts already being vulnerable to this, the only difference though is comments are 1) much more numerous and 2) much more likely for a mod to not notice. The nature of the problem is the same as we had before, but the commenting issue is just a much more severe and difficult to deal with version of it.

  • pooh [she/her, love/loves]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I got hit with it directly but it’s not like I haven’t seen gross porn before, so I just reported and blocked.

    On the topic of online images though I still think it’s a potentially cool and useful feature, but needs some guardrails to prevent abuse. Maybe have them automatically show up as a spoiler, have size limits, limits on have many images in one post, and I don’t know what else. Also maybe limit the feature to accounts over a certain age or to Hexbear Gold™ subscribers.

    Anyways, I realize the site devs are probably busy with everything else and can’t address it right away so totally understandable to just disable them completely.

  • UlyssesT
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    deleted by creator

    • BoarAvoir [they/them]A
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      we already have open ended image posting tbf. but inline in comments presents some new challenges. They are disabled until the moderation team can decide how best to handle them.

    • ImOnADiet
      ·
      2 years ago

      they're going to have to restrict signups I think until they get it fixed

      • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]M
        ·
        2 years ago

        Honestly, somewhat restricted signups are pretty much always a good idea. Reduces bot spam (which we actually have had in the past) and stifles (or at least slows) wreckers

        • ImOnADiet
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think so too, I know a lot of people go "it harms growth!!!!" but tbh if you're so put off by having to write like 3 sentences why you should be able to use the site I dont want you here anyways

            • kristina [she/her]
              ·
              2 years ago

              i want literally every trans person in the globe here tho cat-trans

            • ImOnADiet
              ·
              2 years ago

              exactly, from my understanding hexbear hasn't grown that much the last couple years anyways

              • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]M
                ·
                2 years ago

                Most of our account growth is just the same posters making alts, and wreckers that we've banned. I wonder what the actual number of unbanned user accounts is.

                • ImOnADiet
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  honestly I only even found out about this site like 6 months ago because of the second thought ama, and only made an account a month ago, there's almost 0 advertising of it across the internet I'm not surprised there hasn't been growth (not a bad thing)

        • spectre [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I thinks it's a good compromise between the exposure we get from federation which will drive growth, against writing three sentences to get in.

  • RNAi [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The most predictable thing happens

    shocked-pikachu

    Also, we still need some auto filter of upload images and cool down timer for image upload

    • CannotSleep420
      ·
      2 years ago

      If Hexbear is anything like the upstream, there should be admin settings for rate limiting image posting. An aurofilter is a much more difficult task.

      • RNAi [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        With everyone and their grandma making a dream.ai clone, is it really still that difficult? Especially for a forum with, what? At most 200 images uploaded per day?

  • Starlet [she/her, it/its]
    ·
    2 years ago

    i had to scroll through all of it to click the report button as well, which seems like a flaw

    i just hope we can make images smaller and require prior activity, rather than disabling them entirely

    • solaranus
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • naom3 [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      i had to scroll through all of it to click the report button as well, which seems like a flaw

      I had the same issue

  • solaranus
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • UlyssesT
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      deleted by creator

      • solaranus
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • UlyssesT
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          deleted by creator

        • mar_k [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I don’t see the need for an application, just have a minimum point value, that’s how it is for posting and PMing. Maybe 200 points or a month old account idk, I highly doubt a wrecker is gonna put that much work in when they could just make a post with gore or whatever instead, which only requires like 10 or something points I think

          • solaranus
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • mar_k [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              When you try to make a new post as a new user a box in the corner of the screen tells you “minimum point value x required to post” or something

              • solaranus
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

                • mar_k [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  True there's no sure way of knowing unless you add them up, I wish it showed on our profiles. An alternative might be, say, account must be 30 days old and/or 50 comments minimum, because that's something that does show on your profile

        • D61 [any]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          No application to make an account, but every feature you want to use you need to do a 12 page essay about why Thomas Sankara is cool. sankara-bass

  • ImOnADiet
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yep just had to block that account, my first encounter with a wrecker here

  • DoghouseCharlie [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Counter point: wreckers wouldn't have been smart enough to have thought of that if y'all hadn't kept bringing up that it could be a problem.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It was brought up because it's been an issue on every forum that allows image posting, forever, going back to probably BBS systems. There are a huge number of shock images I can name that most extremely online millennials will remember, and if you could see their faces you'd see the visible cringe because a lot of them are awful.

    • BeamBrain [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Internet trolls have been abusing embedded images ever since they became a thing.

    • temptest [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, if its the user I'm assuming it is (based on the description) then they've been doing it on Lemmy for years.

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Counter point: wreckers wouldn't have been smart enough to have thought of that

      4chan has existed for 20 years, every imaginable form of trolling has already been thought of