The Enshittification continues. Slightly better than Google because you can at least turn it off, but still on by default! Turn that shit off if you use DDG!

    • sovietknuckles [they/them]
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was never for you, the user. Like any advertising company, DuckDuckGo wants to reduce the cost of predicting what products its user will buy, which, at this point, means harvesting your thoughts and asking an AI model what you will buy, even if you've already left.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      That rate of profit do be declining. I forget what pod was talking about it, but they were saying that tech execs think this will be what returns them to the good old days of high profits.

  • Barabas [he/him]
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is very cool that we are not only using a lot more energy to fuel this shit, but also that entire energy networks are being overloaded to do it.

    Look forward to rolling brownouts in order to keep faulty search results and terrible images coming.

  • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unironically, I've been getting better search results from Yandex since this AI dogshit started picking up steam. I'm contemplating switching over full time.

    • What_Religion_R_They [none/use name]
      ·
      5 months ago

      It's good for finding shit that does not appear on Google at all, but it also finds other super weird shit too. To be fair, google also shows me weird religious websites and state department propaganda journal articles seemingly at random on unrelated results.

        • jackmarxist [any]
          ·
          5 months ago

          DDG is censored lol. The owner literally said that he'll censor Russian "Disinformation" and promote western shit.

  • RiotDoll [she/her, she/her]
    ·
    5 months ago

    What kind of violence is theoretically possible against ai infrastructure right now, asking for myself

    • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
      ·
      5 months ago

      Find a random data centre, break in, and start hitting servers with a hammer. Sooner or later you're bound to knock out an ai one.

      • drinkinglakewater [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Randomly hitting servers is too inefficient. The easiest way is to find the loudest server and go ham on that because apparently the Nvidia AI pod things are unbelievably loud

  • supafuzz [comrade/them]
    ·
    5 months ago

    I'm probably going to wind up paying for Kagi soon. One more monthly tax to make the internet halfway usable again

    • alexandra_kollontai [she/her]
      ·
      5 months ago

      I did some digging and it seems that Kagi does have AI features, however their policy is that AI should always be opt-in every single time; only activated when you choose. If you want to read the techbro blog, it's explained a bit more here: https://blog.kagi.com/kagi-ai-search

      Probably best to pay monthly instead of yearly in case they do something you don't like :yea:

        • dat_math [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          oooh tamari

          so like, could you have answered that question without spinning up a 200W gpu somewhere to do the llm "inference"?

          • blobjim [he/him]
            ·
            5 months ago

            and essentially all it's doing is plagiarizing a dozen other answers from various websites.

        • booty [he/him]
          ·
          5 months ago

          and what part of that required an AI?

          • JCreazy@midwest.social
            ·
            5 months ago

            I never said it did. It was just faster than searching through multiple search results and reading through multiple paragraphs.

                • dat_math [they/them]
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Do you really not see why I asked my rhetorical question or do you just want to bicker?

                  • JCreazy@midwest.social
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I wasn't bickering. You're the one trying to argue. It sounds like you're implying that information from AI is inherently incorrect which simply isn't true.

                    • dat_math [they/them]
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      5 months ago

                      First, at the risk of being a pedant, bickering and arguing are distinct activities. Second, I didn't imply llm's results are inherently incorrect. However, it is undeniable that they sometimes make shit up. Thus without other information from a more trustworthy source, an LLM's outputs can't be trusted.