ideology is a hell of a drug

    • Sinister [none/use name, comrade/them]B
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol han chinese people were literally there before turkic tribes that would become the uighurs, these people run term into the ground.

    • iridaniotter [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually I heard the Qing empire did genocide against a different ethnicity - the Dzungar - in Xinjiang.

    • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope the Uighurs hang on to their identity then! I’m sure nothing bad is happening to threaten that…

      • GorbinOutOverHere [comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh cool a reddit liberal

        Do you ever feel like maybe you've been lied to whenever people dig into the Uigher genocide thing and literally EVERY single source eventually circles back to Adrian Zenz or literal State Department mouthpieces like Radio Free Asia?

        Do you ever look at the constantly increasing Uigher population and the fact that they, like other ethnic minorities, were exempt from the One Child policy, and think "hmmm you know what that doesn't make sense if they're genociding them?" Because idk, that fact would give me pause before I go into a xenophobic fury like a good little drone.

            • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              "Muslims don't care about other Muslims. The only credible source are the countries who've spent the last two decades bombing and killing millions of Muslims."

              Real racist shit, accusing Muslims of being untrustworthy whenever their opinions don't line up with the West.

          • Nagarjuna [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            The UN didn't find "nothing," they found a concerning set of laws and practices that didn't rise to the UN's (admittedly broad) definition of genocide. Fwiw, though, the US's treatment of black people also doesn't rise to the UN's standard of genocide, so it doesn't mean everything is squeaky clean over there.

        • VILenin [he/him]M
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, because they work backwards from a predetermined conclusion. They would invent a different genocide if the Uighers didn’t exist.

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can see that they did it with Tibetans before and that's been thrown to the wayside because it's been decades and Tibetans are now more numerous, more educated (in their own language and in Mandarin) and enjoy a higher standard of living than ever before.

            They can only lie about this shit for a certain amount of time before the truth becomes insurmountable, but by that time they'll just move on to other bullshit.

            • MultigrainCerealista [he/him, comrade/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Average life expectancy in Tibet has increased from 35 years in 1951 to 72 years in 2021.

              Tibet is the first region in China to provide 15 years of publicly funded education, from kindergartens to senior high schools.

              This is what liberals oppose.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                But what about the rights of the heckin' wholesome lamas to skin their serfs for decorative purposes?

            • nohaybanda [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              It's incredibly generous of you to think that libs dropped Tibet because of material reality not agreeing with their propaganda.

              More realistically, Xinjiang is the new hot thing because the State Dept saw the Al Qaeda off-shoots there as a useful tool for sabotaging the Belt and Road initiative and booming PV industry in the region. There's only so much fake tears you can squeeze out of a person and there's no point in diluting the message.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, the Dalai Lama turning out to be a pedo probably didn't help the lib cause either.

                  • Awoo [she/her]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Literally the opposite. But libs are so politically illiterate they do not understand what internationalism is.

                  • VILenin [he/him]M
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You just refuse to learn anything about anything, don’t you?

                    • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Did I miss someone trying to spread info in this thread? All i got from you was pig poop, but sure pretend you had something to say I don’t mind

                      • CloutAtlas [he/him]
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        Bruh, they tried to spread info to you by recommending State and Revolution, and without even reading the first 2 sentences on the Wikipedia article you discarded it as nationalism!

                        That wasn't just judging a book by it's cover, it's judging a book by it's title. If anything, the line of argument that a janitor in the US, a janitor in China, a janitor in Russia and Ukraine have more in common with each other than the billionaires of their respective countries is A: correct, and B: it's probably the least nationalist thing you could say. That other person there, who shares no language, nationality, race or culture as you is closer to you than someone who shares all of those traits with you buy owns several mega yachts. That sounds like nationalism to you?

                        • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          As a matter of fact it wasn’t clear that was supposed to be a book! Sounded more like a slogan but you know, let’s all rush to judgement yeah?

                          • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            Just to be clear, are you saying that you thought "State and Revolution" was a slogan like "Blood and Soil" or "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity"? That would be a very unusual reaction but I'm not asking as a point of judgement.

                            Anyway, it's Lenin's most famous work and you can find it for free very easily online including as text here and as an audiobook here.

                            Personally, I think the best introductory work for someone who doesn't have the patience for The Principles of Communism (and I don't have that patience myself) is Engels' Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, here as text and here as an excellent audiobook.

                            Let me know if there's anything that I can do to help.

                            • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
                              ·
                              1 year ago

                              Yes, that’s what I thought lol. In my defense, posting in here led to my inbox blowing up so I didn’t spend much time thinking about it.

                              • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                                ·
                                1 year ago

                                No worries. It's no coincidence that your education system, like mine, probably didn't inform you about those sorts of things.

                              • silent_water [she/her]
                                hexagon
                                ·
                                1 year ago

                                it's generally a good idea to Google something you suspect is a slogan as it's frequently some fascist BS. that would have pulled up the work for free from a number of places. I assumed you had done that and were calling Lenin a nationalist.

                              • puff [comrade/them]
                                ·
                                1 year ago

                                I respect you admitting as much but I also whole-heartedly recommend that you give the book a read, or even Stalin's book 'Dialectical and Historical Materialism' if you're looking for something shorter... I was very much like you once and reading books like these helped me understand a lot of things.

                          • KurtVonnegut [comrade/them]
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            Here on Hexbear we assume everyone knows who Vladimir Lenin is. He is very famous. He was in the Beatles!

                          • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            you literally rushed to judgement without knowing what it was

                            it's unbelievable how incredibly dumb reddit libs are

                  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah and "Combat Liberalism" sounds like a handbook for English martial arts.

              • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Actually reading something for yourself? Literally any literature.

                Michael Parenti, Samir Amin and Vijay Prashad's works are good starting points in my opinion.

      • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        You're correct! Nothing bad is happening at all, things going pretty well actually. Population on the rise, plenty of new Uyghur language protections.

        • NoGodsNoMasters [they/them, she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don't mean this as a gotcha at all but do you have any idea what ended up happening with the curriculum reform in Inner Mongolia that was set to replace Mongolian with Mandarin in core subjects even in the Mongolian schools? I know there were some protests about it a few years back but I never heard if the government actually walked it back. Would kinda suck if they didn't.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Afaik they're doing pretty good. A part of the china genocide uighurs xinjiang eleven billion dead was helping jurists and clerics in Xinjiang untangle the Salafi/Wahhabi innovation from actual Islam. I believe there were also programs to educate Uighur people about Uighur history and culture, and the history of Xinjiang, to try to inoculate people against Salafist ideology being promulgated from Saudi. Knowledge is power, and knowing as much as possible about Islam and their own culture was apparently a powerful way to shut out Saudi-back Salafi ideology. It's hard to overstate how much Salafism/Wahhabism is an incredible deviation from most prior Islamic schools of thought. It's a really perverse distortion of the religion. Unfortunately with unlimited oil money and the full backing of the US Saudi has been able to shape Islamic education around the world. You want a school, you just call them up and they'll build a school and send you textbooks and teachers that'll start pumping kids full of Salafism.

        • Sinister [none/use name, comrade/them]B
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes the saudi/turkey sponsored mosques in belgium/bosnia/germany all the time, which is one of the reasons that so many isis fighter came from there.

        • SkibidiToiletFanAcct [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          for what it's worth, Salafism is a sincere religious belief, and most conceptions of human rights hold freedom of religion as inviolable. In China's case, it's the political content of salafism rather than religious intolerance that caused the crackdown. Salafism spread to communities of Hui muslims in the early 20th century, and because this historic community is unrelated to modern political messages, they've been largely exempt from suppression, and China is content to let them practice just an austere form of Islam.

          • Redcat [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Salafism isn't just a sincere religious belief. It's a political project that is heavily financed by the gulf monarchies all across the world. Particularly vulnerable countries like Pakistan have their school systems injected with gulf money to spread Salafism. Countries like Turkey, which retained a state religious authority, could only slow it's advance. Nowadays, the Salafi lie of being the true Islam as practiced by the ancients is genuinely believed in the background of islamic culture, while the actual religious tradition as it was practiced for more than a thousand years is regarded as 'mystic' and 'sufi'. It's a real problem that is nearly impossible to disentangle. We can only hope that prosperity, rising literacy, and straight up peace would help. But to draw an analogy, the rise of a liberal, urbanized culture in the United States only served to spook the evangelicals and make them go global in their hateful, exploitative, preaching.

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Salafism is a sincere religious belief.

              And that's a problem.

              most conceptions of human rights hold freedom of religion as inviolable.

              Who cares?

              Wahhabism is a hyper-reactionary militant political movement every bit as inimical to leftist projects, and human wellbeing in general, as fascism. Sucks for the Hui but their coreligionists are assholes and need to be suppressed. Same with the Christian Fascists in America, same with the fascist Hindutva movement in India, same with the Mormons, same with the Scientologists, same with a dozen other ideological groups that can't play nice with others. I don't care if it's a religion or a secular ideology or a book club. I'm still holding out hope that the Muslims will rise up against Saudi and crush Wahhabism but it seems increasingly unlikely as time goes on.

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    US Marine shouting across the Afghan/China border "Stop doing colonialism!"

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    You'd blow this fucker's mind if you told him about the Mongol Empire.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably blow his mind if you told him the RoC apparently still claims Mongolia and big chunks of Russia as it's sovereign territory.

      • Beaver [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        While the ROC held China's security council seat, they actually blocked a few new African nations from joining the UN cuz they were butthurt that they wouldn't support their claim to ownership of Mongolia.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    This user is very obviously a fascist. The "socialist" in their name does not refer to our socialism, they are a nazi.

      • mar_k [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        LOL I went to their profile and it seems like they've commented on this post but it's only showing on lemmy, maybe it doesn't tell them they're banned?

        https://lemmy.ml/u/CatholicSocialist