whoops no this is UC Davis in 2011. the cop pepper spraying these nonviolent student protestors filed for worker's compensation claiming "psychiatric damage" due to having his name released and won more than $38k USD in compensation.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I'm sorry, you are right that there is oppression in the US, but to suggest that this incident is somehow equivalent to the Tiananmen Square Massacre, where people were run over with tanks, and their remains hosed down the street drains, is absolutely disgusting.

    The term "false equivalence" doesn't even begin to describe this. The disrespect for what happened is so reprehensible that it completely invalidates any point you might be trying to make. People died in Tiananmen Square.

      • very_poggers_gay [they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        so the evidence for this claim ("people were run over with tanks, and their remains hosed down the street drains") is literally just someone said that someone else said hearsay passed through a game of telephone.

        I went down an internet rabbit hole the other night trying to find the true source of the g*re images most commonly attributed to events in Tiananmen Square. I made like no progress after an hour, but one thread that stuck out to me was on the subreddit /r/MorbidReality, where a mod said the images were proven true by a reliable source, but their source was just a link to the search results from typing "Tiananmen Square" into gettyimages lol smuglord Like not even a specific image, just the landing page for searching a keyword on a stock image site...

        If the proof of burden is on those alleging a massacre of (tens of) thousands of civilians, you would think they would do more than share like a small handful of images, most of which come with no easily accessible or verifiable context/explanation. it's so weird.

        edit cause the thread is still new-ish: if a user can shed light on the original source(s) of the images I'm describing can you please share so i can find intellectual closure on them?

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the evidence that this didn't happen, in addition to the accounts of western reporters physically present in the square who said no one died and there wasn't much violence in the square, is the like thousands of people who were students in the square at the time and don't understand why Americans are so obsessive about it.

        • robinn2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

        • Huldra [they/them, it/its]
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is literally just the same kind of shit with anonymous claims and no sources, we have photos from the square right the morning after with no signs of such a large scale massacre, do you believe the Chinese have some unnatural power to clean up the square and ensure no photographic evidence of the massacre actually exists?

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am begging you to go to Beijing and ask people what they think of the June 4 incident.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as the Chinese government censors the topic, it's hard to know what exactly happened and what didnt. We are left with political statements and third-hand "knowledge". Which isnt ideal.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        ·
        1 year ago

        Although the uprising is still taboo in China, everyone who was there on the square remembers. At the end of Beijing Coma, the protagonist Dai Wei recalls returning to the place where, a few hours before, his friend had been mown down by a tank. He remembers seeing her flattened corpse in the distance and noticing that: “As if refusing to be crushed, the flesh and bones had risen a fraction from the tarmac.”

        https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/may/30/ma-jian-tiananmen-square-remembered

          • ProfessorAdonisCnut [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            So is Gulag Archipelago, doesn't stop libs treating Solzhenitsyn's drivel like it's holy scripture

        • emizeko [they/them]
          hexagon
          ·
          1 year ago

          not only do you not read our links, you don't even read your own. embarrassing.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Although the uprising is still taboo in China

          No it's not. No one cares and folks don't understand why Americans are obsessed with it.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fucking daily. It's infuriating. It's so frustrating. Why are they obsessed with a completely absurd fantasy about this one specific incident? Catholics aren't this obsessive with the crucifixion.

        • booty [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          having sources is astroturfing, not having sources is evidence of being correct. of course.

        • very_poggers_gay [they/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can you explain what is the difference between astroturfing and providing sources and evidence?

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jesus christ. I wish you were a bot. Bots actually have an excuse for being unable to exceed their programming.

        • robinn2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

        • Mokey [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not everyone takes Western medias depiction of things as fact, I mean if you werent a complete dipshit the least you could do is try to composite a narrative from Chinese and Western sources instead of taking the #1 Geopolitical enemies word for it and countless other things it has lied about.

          You've seen first hand how shitty American government and it's goons are to it's own people why do you think they wouldn't lie about their main adversary?

        • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, but we do have reading groups, encourage each other to expand our knowledge, and post useful and interesting links to each other if they're interested. You know, like most people do, like a community does.

          Also: imagine being proud deliberate ignorance.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if a corporation paid for that, a list of links would still not qualify as astroturfing

    • emizeko [they/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      https://streamable.com/unjnw9

      video of tank man NOT getting run over, followed by a bunch of clips of American police cars running over protestors

      • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Note, those tanks are leaving the square.

        According to the western narrative, those tanks just spent hours gunning down unarmed protesters, then crushing their corpses into liquid.

        And then stop to argue with a single dude trying to block them from leaving.

    • emizeko [they/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      people were run over with tanks, and their remains hosed down the street drains

      no they weren't. about 300 people died in clashes outside the square, more than half of which were PLA and police.

      The Myth of Tiananmen and the price of a passive press | Columbia Journalism Review

      The Tian’anmen Square ‘Massacre’: The West’s Most Persuasive, Most Pervasive Lie. | Mango Press

      https://www.qiaocollective.com/education/tiananmenreadinglist

        • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wtf this is literally George Foreman 1989

          I thought you were gonna link to a source but instead you're linking slam poetry you absolute bozo

        • robinn2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

        • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You should ask yourself the following question: Why does Tiananmen Square keep getting dragged up by western media, and meanwhile we never hear anything about this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwangju_Uprising

          Try to think of a reason why.

          (And no, the answer is not "well ackshullly South Korea is a fReE dEmOcRaCY now so it doesn't matter")

        • emizeko [they/them]
          hexagon
          ·
          1 year ago

          responding to the Columbia Journalism Review article (by the WaPo's Beijing bureau chief who was in the square) with an unsourced tone poem inspired by Jorjor Well, you don't look like a shit-eating clown at all

          The actual content of the utterance as it spills out is no more complex or nuanced than “China Bad,” and the elementary mistakes people make when they write out statements of “solidarity” make that much clear. This is not a complaint that these people have not studied China enough — there’s no reason to expect them to study China, and retrospectively I think to some extent it was a mistake to personally have spent so much time trying to teach them. It’s instead an acknowledgment that they are eagerly wielding the accusation like a club, that they are in reality unconcerned with its truth-content, because it serves a social purpose.

          What is this social purpose? Westerners want to believe that other places are worse off, exactly how Americans and Canadians perennially flatter themselves by attacking each others’ decaying health-care systems, or how a divorcee might fantasize that their ex-lover’s blooming love-life is secretly miserable. This kind of “crab mentality” is actually a sophisticated coping mechanism suitable for an environment in which no other course of action seems viable. Cognitive dissonance, the kind that eventually spurs one into becoming intolerant of the status quo and into action, is initially unpleasant and scary for everybody. In this way, we can begin to understand the benefit that “victims” of propaganda derive from carelessly “spreading awareness.” Their efforts feed an ambient propaganda haze of controversy and scandal and wariness that suffocates any painful optimism (or jealousy) and ensuing sense of duty one might otherwise feel from a casual glance at the amazing things happening elsewhere. People aren’t “falling” for atrocity propaganda; they’re eagerly seeking it out, like a soothing balm.

          https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/

    • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      People did die. Loyal members of the comunist crade died at the hands of liberals paid by the US government. It is a sad moment were we should remember just how evil the US really is.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that this would be a false equivalence. But, the title is a form of persuasion. By saying "this was done by an evil villain" and then saying "no, this was done by who you thought to be the hero" the post can catch some liberals off-guard before a defense response kicks in and this could begin their path leftwards.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        ·
        1 year ago

        Making a defense of an authoritarian regime, as so many CCP apologists in this thread have done, is no way to begin anyone's path leftwards.

        The CCP is communist in name only, not in operation.

          • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
            ·
            1 year ago

            Look man, I didn't pull out the "China boogieman"; OP did in the title.

            If you genuinely believe that the CCP is not that bad, and is actually running a functionally communist government, then you are way more ignorant than you are implying that I am. You have no idea what an oppressive authoritarian regime actually looks like in practice.