When shame can kill a cracker then we can talk; till then I want Cenk and his whole fucking family out of the discourse
Shame is only effective if the shamed one has any conscience. Western states have none.
this genuinely reads like satire if I didn't know it was Cenk who posted it
Uyghur oppression
Uygur oppressionPut this guy and his shit takes in a reeducation facility already please, damn.
I bombed a hospital
You make me want to cry. That's (in my opinion) kind of cruel. But even so, I do respect YOUR opinion. I will bomb anotherThe chuds told me that TYT is communist though?! Cenk isn't the new Mao?
No no, that's because the chuds heard his first name, assumed it was the slur for Chinese people and associated it with Mao because it was the first c-word that popped in their heads.
Cenk might legit agree with this shit lol
Hitler killed five million Jews. It is the greatest crime of our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher’s knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.....It would have aroused the world and the people of Germany.... As it is they succumbed anyway in their millions.
-Gandhi
this is the same take as when chuds think they've solved mass shootings by saying "everyone in the venue should have dogpiled onto the shooter! They can't beat 200 people with sticks!"
Chuds: The dumb Russians just threw waves upon waves of unarmed conscripts at the Germans in WWII until they ran out of bullets
Also Chuds: Throw waves upon waves of unarmed children at gunmen, that will solve mass shootings
Or
smuglords that have to affirm how "cool, calm, and collected"(tm) they would be during frightening and life-threatening scenarios.Every time I imagine myself in an active shooter scenario, I effortlessly save the day. Why don't people do that, like I would?
I wonder if there is some kind of chrysalis those types emerge from after entering it as a "I could be a champion in the UFC if I really trained" guy on their 30th birthday
Mother Theresa has a run for her money when it comes to worst "good" historical figure there.
"In order for non-violence to work, your opponent must have a conscience."
There's a reason why nonviolent resistance worked in India but why nonviolent resistance in Palestine (first intifada) only lead to being shot or outright murdered, and you get to hear that reason resoundingly on Twitter (for example an Israeli asking 'did they release the hostages' on a picture of a screaming child whose
spoiler
intestines
are hanging out)
Is that reason that the Indian resistance also had a very notable violent component?
I don't like implying that Israelis are uniquely cruel. They're just regular European cruel.
Israel can't even make shoot and cry movies because they can't stomach the cry part
Reminds me of an Israeli general who actually spoke out and said their attacks on (1967?) were not pre-emptive and he was sharing this because it insulted the IOF to be thought to have initiated the attack cause they were scared.
"Mr. Hitler, sir. Pardon me for saying so - but you are in the wrong and you should be ashamed."
"You think so, Neville? Hmmm... You know what?... My goodness - I do feel shame! Maybe I should dissolve the Nazi party and end German militarism!"
"Quite so!"
"I was being sarcastic - you dumb Brit dipstick."
Right, but it paint Chamberlain as naive but good willing liberal while in reality he was bloodthirsty western supremacist who did everything he could to point the nazi genocide machine at Soviet Union.
Shoving Netanyahu's face in the apartheid and saying "NO! NO! BAD BOY!"
I feel that if a random politician had their face rubbed in dog shit every time the IOF killed someone, that might get them to stop.
He cannot be this stupid. It's impossible for someone to be so ignorant, which honestly makes this worse.
and reread it
. Eat shit cenk
