• M68040 [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I feel like this falls under the “life” part of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”

    Also, in a broader sense, “we can shit everywhere all we want and never clean up” is a criminally idiotic way to govern

    • Melonius [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      maybe-later-honey founding fathers didn't explicitly say where to shit so our hands are tied

    • AbbysMuscles [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      But there is a line in the constitution mentioning the government's duty to provide for the general welfare.

      Not that any of this shit matters but still

    • joseph [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      That phrase is not in the constitution tho. It was a line from the DOI at the start of the revolution and isn’t actually binding to the current American federal government.

        • silent_water [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          it's worth about as much as toilet paper since this has never meant anything during any part of US history.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is regarding the State itself not depriving people of life (e.g. by execution) except by due process, not a guarantee that life will be protected in any other sense for any other reason.

          Obviously also bullshit given cops summarily executing people and having qualified immunity, etc., but if we're being pedantic, we should go all the way.

  • duderium [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Biden is the more competent fascist we were warned about. Capital will get its way regardless of which major political party is running the country.

    • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]M
      ·
      1 year ago

      there's only been competent fascists and incompetent fascists for the last few decades at least, Trump was merely so incompetent that it temporarily broke the grand spell before the government used the Men in Black memory deletion thingy and everybody went "Awesome, back to brunch!" on January 20th, 2021

    • Egon
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • mar_k [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It's also really weird how the highest court in the land is supposed to be dedicated to interpreting the constitution and extrapolating whether the founding fathers would have supported or opposed something fucking 250 years ago. Other countries rewrite parts of their constitutions all the time, but in burgerland George Washington is a deity that supposedly knew it all.

        Also, America has the second oldest working constitution in the world which (only beaten by a microstate), which is kinda crazy for how young the country is

        • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          It's very Warhammer 40k by worshipping the document equivalent of a headstone for centuries.

        • gonk [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          What's even weirder is that the US Supreme Court was not even given that power by the constitution and just kinda gave it to itself in Marbury v Madison

      • pythonoob@programming.dev
        ·
        1 year ago

        What's the difference between a lawyer and a demon? Idk

        Both make pacts and contracts. Both honor the verbiage of the contract to the letter over the intent. Both will cost you dearly. Both generally only show up uninvited or when something bad happens. Both take benefit from others' misfortune.

        I can't tell the difference.

        • Egon
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          deleted by creator

      • krolden@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        And they love to cling to single amendments instead of the entire document, as it should be interpreted.

  • FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the Biden administration’s June 22 court filing, Justice Department lawyers argued that because the child plaintiffs are not the only people who will be harmed by ecological breakdown, the suit should be thrown out.

    “The state of the climate is a public and generalized issue, and so interests in the climate are unlike the particularized personal liberty or personal privacy interests of individuals the Supreme Court has previously recognized as being protected by fundamental rights,” the Justice Department wrote.

    biden You see, this is going to kill everyone so your individual concerns about being killed are invalid

    joker-amerikkklap

    • ped_xing [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      “They're trying to kill me," Yossarian told him calmly.

      "No one's trying to kill you," Clevinger cried.

      "Then why are they shooting at me?" Yossarian asked.

      "They're shooting at everyone," Clevinger answered. "They're trying to kill everyone."

      "And what difference does that make?”

      ― Joseph Heller, Catch-22

  • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    so, they're arguing for a new amendment, right?

    they're arguing for a new amendment, right?

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      r/politics is just saying "yeah, true", literally nobody going after Biden (some people actually saying "Jacobin just doing this because they're desperate for Trump back because Biden is so good"), and people arguing about how the 'sacred documents' say we can't do anything

      America is so fucked lmao

  • SootyChimney [any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, thank god the document was written to protect us from the transport of alcohol, but not to say, ensure we actually get to be alive.

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The governance that had the hem and haw about whether black people are people should be the one to determine if we all choke on industrial refuse.

  • VILenin [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    We can’t do anything the slavers from 250 years ago didn’t tell us to do

  • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]
    ·
    1 year ago

    "There is no constitutional right to a stable climate" is giving me some real "There are things more important than peace" vibes

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalists really out there trying to pick a fight with the climate, you can't drone strike a hurricane Brandon

    • usa_suxxx [they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      With our current tech, but with our future tech that doesn't exist not even in theory, it will be possible in 2030

    • Egon
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have the white paper for my "nuke the sahara until the temperature comes down" right here.