• gloomyroomy [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Don't have infinite people to throw away either. Lose battles badly enough and people won't fight. These dipshits human wave into enough fights they will use themselves up fast.

          • Rev [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            Everyone is like read Lenin, read Lenin, but while Lenin is cool and good leftists better read Sun Tzu. Even better guerilla, urban/partisan warfare and counter-intelligence tactics manuals.

          • gloomyroomy [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            That, and you absolutely need smart leaders that know how to maneuver and keep supply chains. A dork with a rifle waiting in the trees in mississippi while it's being won on the coasts and great lakes doesn't mean much

    • Magjee [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Like no one understands how blockchains work

      ~

      Definitely not this dude

        • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          It's a mathematical algorithm that you can add encrypted data to and once there it can't be changed basically.

          There's a use for it in voting, I don't think we're using it in the states in any way though lol

  • Downanotherday [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    If Biden's first action as president is arresting Hillary, I will start a qanon for liberals.

  • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Did they use blockchain to count the votes or is this guy just saying the word for no discernable reason?

    I know there is a use case for blockchain in voting, but as far as I'm aware it isn't used in the states lol

    Edit: some people were talking about using it in the future lol, but it wasn't deployed in this election.

    Whoever the fuck is in this tweet is fucking brain dead.

    • angry_dyke [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Rivaling the SDSU college dems, "Brazilian spec ops are boots on the ground in Philly" for peak cope.

    • anthm17 [he/him]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      There is no use case for blockchain.

      • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        It's a secure way to transfer data, that's it.

        It's really good at that one thing. Not a currency, nothing else.

        But you can transfer data with a very tight and personalized encryption while guaranteeing it is being added to the data pool, which is useful in voting.

        • anthm17 [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          We have secure ways. Blockchain is a solution in search of a problem.

          • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            Well, it could theoretically be used to allow voting via an at home computer or cellphone without anyone being able to wine about security concerns, not that it'd stop them.

            Idk if there's anything else like that yet.

            • anthm17 [he/him]
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 years ago

              We don't need to do that, you're searching for a problem.

              • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 years ago

                Making sure every person can vote in a democracy is pretty important.

                • anthm17 [he/him]
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Blockchain doesn't accomplish that.

                    • anthm17 [he/him]
                      ·
                      4 years ago

                      Blockchain isn't going to fix deliberate voter suppression.

                      • Rev [none/use name]
                        ·
                        4 years ago

                        It's not gonna fix it because ultimately the powers that be can always just pull numbers out of their ass, but at least you can then track the fraud being committed (even if you can't do anything about it).

                      • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
                        ·
                        4 years ago

                        Oh yeah sorry, I meant using it under a different system entirely.

                        Like you could guarantee some despot isn't coming in and stuffing your ballots.

                        Obviously under this shit it is useless lol.

                      • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
                        ·
                        4 years ago

                        I mean unless you're purposely giving someone else your key it does. It's the same argument as the one against mail-in votes in that case.

                        • Value_Form2 [none/use name]
                          ·
                          4 years ago

                          Mail has a literal paper trail and destroying it would require a big physical operation all over the election area.

                          • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
                            ·
                            4 years ago

                            The idea would be you send every "eligible voter" (whatever that means lol) an encrypted key to their mailing address.

                            You take that online, confirm it is you via a second authorization like SSN/ID, and then use that to add your vote to the chain.

                            It'd be on there in a few minutes, wouldn't require poll counters, and it could be accomplished on pretty much any device.

                            The key can't be spoofed, you can check on your own vote immediately, and it's very quickly added to the whole count.

                            I just see it as an all-around improvement over mail-in due to its quickness and it gets rid of any accusations of biased poll counters.

                            I don't really believe it would matter unless the system it was used under actually wanted a fair democracy though. It'd just be a convenient and secure way to go about it.

                          • Value_Form2 [none/use name]
                            ·
                            4 years ago

                            Taking the voting system, which is something almost anyone can understand see transparently, and putting it into the hands of a labour aristocracy is dumb.

                            • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
                              ·
                              4 years ago

                              Like I don't see it as a "fix", more as a potential way to go about elections that makes things easier for the voter.

                              It would absolutely do nothing to help the state of election under the US system.

  • Sushi_Desires
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    The original block chain: https://i.imgur.com/LuysFCW.png

  • ChapoBapo [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Arrests are coming! Any second now!

    Truly amazing that anyone still buys this. Literally everything has been "actually 9,000-D chess" and it's never right and they just keep going. Now the 9,000-D chess is aCTUALLY Trump has to LOSE, so he can win! Brainworm levels off the charts folks you hate to see it.

    • CoralMarks [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's all part of the plan. Trump knows he's done everything the president can to fight the deep state, so he will now go underground himself to deliver the final blows. Believe people. :agony-yehaw:

    • TossedAccount [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I immediately thought of this. There's a very good reason we still do paper ballots.

  • cum_drinker69 [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Obviously the arrests are coming, who would know better than some random dickhead on twitter

    Edit: lol this is the male Louise Mensch

  • glimmer_twin [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Are these the same arrests that have been coming since January 2017, or like, different ones?