Hey it's Bardfinn.
I've asked you
TWO
Extremely clear questions.
ONE:
CAN YOU ABIDE BY OUR COMMUNITY'S RULES?
and
TWO:
WERE YOU TRYING TO CALL ME A LIAR?
These are questions I asked YOU.
You can answer them -- or not.
And you can participate here.
Or not.
The moderation team of /r/ContraPoints is the moderation team of /r/ContraPoints.
YOU are NOT on it.
Before 35 minutes ago, you'd never participated in our community.
How we run our community is our business, and the business of the people who participate here in good faith.
We don't allow disrespect; We don't allow verbal or emotional abuse; We don't allow people to brigade our subreddit and post off-topic posts and metadrama.
What YOU think you know about our moderation team is informed solely by third-hand hearsay and screenshots released by someone abusing their position, edited and therefore cherry picked to support a narrative.
That narrative is abusive.
It will not be allowed.
No one will be allowed to come here and back-seat run our subreddit, or light torches and brandish pitchforks.
So now,
THREE Questions:
The first two still must be answered,
and
AM I PERFECTLY CLEAR THAT YOU ARE NOT A MODERATOR OF THIS SUBREDDIT?
Now look how far you've come! You are now a moderator of this subreddit!
Fuck I KNEW I recognized this dork's username from somewhere. Although I guess the fact that I did remember that is more of an indictment of myself than of him lmao
Late stage Mod-itis.
OBEY, PEASANT, OR TO THE GALLOWS WITH YE
I just downvoted your comment.
FAQ
What does this mean?
The amount of karma (points) on your comment and Reddit account has decreased by one.
Why did you do this?
There are several reasons I may deem a comment to be unworthy of positive or neutral karma. These include, but are not limited to:
- Rudeness towards other Redditors,
- Spreading incorrect information,
- Sarcasm not correctly flagged with a
/s.
Am I banned from the Reddit?
No - not yet. But you should refrain from making comments like this in the future. Otherwise I will be forced to issue an additional downvote, which may put your commenting and posting privileges in jeopardy.
I don't believe my comment deserved a downvote. Can you un-downvote it?
Sure, mistakes happen. But only in exceedingly rare circumstances will I undo a downvote. If you would like to issue an appeal, shoot me a private message explaining what I got wrong. I tend to respond to Reddit PMs within several minutes. Do note, however, that over 99.9% of downvote appeals are rejected, and yours is likely no exception.
How can I prevent this from happening in the future?
Accept the downvote and move on. But learn from this mistake: your behavior will not be tolerated on Reddit.com. I will continue to issue downvotes until you improve your conduct. Remember: Reddit is privilege, not a right.
I just shit and cum at your comment.
FAQ
What does this mean?
The amount of shit (and cum) on my computer and floor has increased by one.
Why did you do this?
There are several reasons I may deem a comment to be worthy of feces or ejaculation. These include, but are not limited to:
-
Being a chud
-
Dank copypasta bro, where'd you find it
-
walter
Am I going to shit and cum too?
No - not yet. But you should refrain from shitposting and cumposting like this in the future. Otherwise I will be forced to shit and cum again, which may put your shitting and cumming privileges in jeopardy.
I don’t believe my comment deserved being shit and cum at. Can you un-cum it?
Sure, mistakes happen. But only in exceedingly rare circumstances will I put shit back into my butt. If you would like to issue an appeal, shoot me a hot load explaining what I got wrong. I tend to respond to retaliatory ejaculation within several minutes. Do note, however, that over 99.9% of semen dies before it can fertilize the egg, and yours is likely no exception.
How can I prevent this from happening in the future?
Accept the goopy brown and white substance and move on. But learn from this mistake: your behavior will not be tolerated in my mom’s basement. I will continue to shit and cum until you improve your conduct. Remember: ejaculation is privilege, not a right.
But only in exceedingly rare circumstances will I put shit back into my butt.
lmao
I found it somewhere on chapo.chat or the subreddit lol, can't remember which
-
If I hurl emotional abuse at you and you react, that's an ad hominem baby, you can't just say white people can't use the N-word because it's "racist" makes you feel "uncomfortable", that's an argument from your feelings, and is therefore completely invalid. Look here jack, the burden of proof is on YOU to prove white people using the N-word is a bad thing. You started this argument therefore I can just flat out say it's ok but you have to write a 230 page essay with a 40 page bibliography from objective impartial sources that are verified to be factually reputable, cited in the MLA format with annotations explaining why I should trust them. Oh and did I mention that it needs to be completely sterile and devoid of any human emotion whatsoever? Don't wanna be an SJW now do you?
I wrote a lengthy treatise on logical fallacies 20 years ago.
This is one of the funniest things I've ever read. I'm also 90% certain she's referring to her term paper for Intro to Logic or something like that.
If any living person uses the term "treatise" for something they wrote, they're a fraud, no exceptions.
Maybe a bad speller who once drafted some international treaties?
they’re a fraud, no exceptions
woke capitalist realism, "actually it's impossible to not be a mindless drone in the 21st century"
I didn't say that, i said that people naming their term papers and effortposts "treatises" as if they're some 17th century national economist are pretentious dorks that shouldn't be taken seriously.
Also not a GenZDong comm apparently?
Genzdong has their lifeboat on Lemmygrad.
Joke’s on them. When we turn on federation they’ll migrate here anyway.
Moderator of 56 subreddits including AHS. We should troll them every day.
Doesn't she threaten to sue people who annoy her in modmail?
These people think disagreeing with other people is just a game where you get 1 point for every fallacy you point out and the person with the most points wins.
how you should allocate resources to online debate:
never online debate, what are you, stupid? how long must this go on for before you recognise it's an exercise in futility?
this.
argue like a right winger. constantly drop little snippets.
"weird how adrian zenz, source of the uyghur genocide, also happens to have a book about white jesus smiting china"
that's it, that's your argument--leave it and don't reply to anything else. Leave it in the max visibility subcomments. Actually it's kind of unfortunate that we have to explain this, it should be second nature to any terminally online schizo.
If you're gonna dedicate time and effort, make sure it's on a dedicated site/blog for it. Not in reddit comments debating a robot that 5 randoms might see
How i allocate resources in online discussions: i make a fucking flow chart
Apparently said post was not worth a nanosecond of their time, but worth scrounging up that image and posting a link.
