Christ I have really come to loathe Chomsky

        • Divine_Chaos100 [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 years ago

          I mean you can, but i like it more when you do your tedious takes because it looks a lot more mature even if i don't agree with most of them (this is one of those btw)

      • gayhobbes [he/him]
        hexagon
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        First time I've seen it and I already love it

      • DirtBagBigBoss [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Here you go. Have fun.

        https://redditsearch.io/?term=Chomsky&dataviz=false&aggs=false&subreddits=&searchtype=comments&search=true&start=1597093290&end=1597179690&size=100

        • Divine_Chaos100 [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Noam Chomsky: Decades of "the Neoliberal Plague" Left U.S. Unprepared for COVID-19 Outbreak

          Horrible take.

      • Perplexiglass [they/them]
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        4 years ago

        It's important we besmirch and muddy the waters of allies who've demonstrated life-long advocacy and class-based analysis when they dare proffer harm reduction in a lose-lose scenario.

        • WhyIsItReal [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          class-based analysis and chomsky don’t belong in the same sentence

    • ami [they/them,he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Noam “Dialectics are dumb cause big words and I will pretend I don’t understand them” Chomsky

      Wait what. I gotta know more. I'm dumb as fuck and even I know what dialectics are.

    • vorenza [any]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Every Morning i Check the best newspaper in the world, the new york times

      This doesn't sound like Chomsky at all. Quick google search shows nothing, although i vaguely remember that Chomsky saying he reads a ton of newspapers everyday starting with NYTimes, but not praising it.

        • vorenza [any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Okay this was really surprising, mostly because you wouldn’t expect that take from a guy who called it "emperor's lapdog"

          • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            It tells him what to look into more because anything they report is probably purposeful propaganda.

      • quartz [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        It's the financial times that he praised, not nyt.

        To be fair, they do have a little less thick layer of cum on their pages, but they do bend the truth to the ideology of the wall street boyz n gurls. They definitely aren't the 'only newspaper printing the truth' or whatever he said about them

    • Hotspur21 [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      This made me wonder what is the most “free” country in the world?

  • BreadPrices [he/him,comrade/them]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    I heard Vaush give the same argument, idk why these people think this will be the year the democrats actually give a fuck about people on the left.

    • gayhobbes [he/him]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's been two seconds since I last complained about Vaush but fuck Vaush

    • Blurst_Of_Times [he/him,they/them]
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      They literally just got done smacking us around the living room, now they're already telling us that this time will be different, they'll be sensitive to our needs, they had to do it to keep us from making a mistake, you don't really want Bernie, do you babe?

      • BreadPrices [he/him,comrade/them]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Such a stretch to take Lenin's comments on "participate in elections" to mean "gotta vote blue no matter who". Such a fuckin dunce.

  • JoeBiden [she/her]
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    His defense of signing the Harper's letter is "if you criticize me you're helping the right wing" lmao

    • gayhobbes [he/him]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      I wish Anand had asked him about Glenn Greenwald getting Mean Girled out of signing the letter

  • Speaker [e/em/eir]
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    You're just now loathing Chomsky? The man hasn't had a good take in 50 years!

    • greaseboy99 [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Thank fucking god someone said it. The dude has/had good shit to say, but most of it is pretty old at this point. He's also a condescending prick on the regular and he has big ivory tower vibes if you ask me.

    • gayhobbes [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      I do! He makes a lot of noise, preens himself, but a whole team behind him actually provides all the good stuff.

  • DecolonizeCatan [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    A good palate cleanser for Chomsky's ridiculous lesser evilism is to watch Chris Hedges obliterate Robert Reich in a debate over whether or not to vote for Hillary in 2016.

    Bottom line--it doesn't really matter if you vote for the proto-fascist or the neoliberal, you get fascism either way. And more, it fails to draw a line in the sand and tacitly permits the dems to slide further and further right. The only viable path to socialism is organizing outside the dems.

  • ElGosso [he/him]
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    His argument about climate mitigation doesn't even make sense - if we're not carbon neutral by 2030 then no half-measures will save us anyway

  • artangels [he/him]
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    i understand some people are saying "trump is so bad that anybody would be more receptive to left wing policies" but what i dont get is some people legitimatly having the idea that joe will be sympathetic to left wing policies, like at all? do people think his whole unity commission is really for anything but show?

  • CanYouFeelItMrKrabs [any, he/him]
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    I think this does make sense. Under a Biden administration the few good people in Congress will at least be a part of making legislation. The threat of being primaried might also influence some votes in Congress.

      • CanYouFeelItMrKrabs [any, he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        I think think worse case under Biden there's legislation that promotes natural gas and renewables. I think that's preferable to no legislation at all and the EPA rolling back methane regulations on natural gas pipelines

        • kaka [he/him,they/them]
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 years ago

          I agree but this is Chapo where Trump is the same as Biden and voting is stupid

  • Tychoxii [he/him, they/them]
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 years ago

    ie. chomsky want you to get off your ass which requires you to stop posting.

    no wonder there's so much snark

    • communistthrowaway69 [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Motherfucker, the only lever you have in bourgeois electoralism is your fucking vote.

      If you vote for the asshole, you endorse them and their entire platform.

      No, it doesn't matter that you don't agree in your head. Or that you'll march around in the streets afterwards. You've given them the power already! Why would they listen?

      There literally is no such thing as "pushing someone left" once they're elected. You fucking gave them a mandate! They do not have to listen to you, you fucking lost the primary!

      This is unbelievably basic shit.

      Your only ability to "push" someone electorally is to threaten to withhold your vote, which you literally cannot do if you promise to vote for them.

      How do people not understand basic power dynamics?