• Parzivus [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Saying this with Ukraine flags in your profile is an interesting take

  • regularassbitch [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    it's always weird when someone is trans but not in some stage of radicalization. like the world hates your guts and wants you dead by any means necessary but god forbid you fight back by doing anything but dropping a :vote: in the ballot box

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
      ·
      3 years ago

      if you ask me, marking a piece of paper and putting it gingerly in a ballot box is already extremely violent. You're engaging in a war of ideology against the opposing side through your actions, and war's a terrible thing as is.

      • regularassbitch [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I suggest we stop calling them :vote: s and start calling them "liberal car bombs"

        • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
          ·
          3 years ago

          ... great bit, IF YOU WANT TO REALLY MAKE AN IMPACT AT THE NEXT ELECTION MAKE SURE TO TAKE YOUR VOTE AND BOMB THAT BALLOTBOX AS A MEMBER OF THE DEMOCRATIC (not republican) ARMY!

          • regularassbitch [she/her]
            ·
            3 years ago

            the only bomb I need is a freakin bath bomb after all this malarkey in the senate!

          • Vncredleader
            ·
            3 years ago

            Whole knew meaning to

            But will anyone here object if, with a ballot paper in this hand and an Armalite in the other, we take power in Ireland?

      • NomadicWarMachine [any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I once wanted to make a True Neutral Paladin character for a DnD game who's whole thing was being militantly dedicated to the idea of centrism, to the point that before each battle he would wound himself for 50% of his HP, and then only ever try and do about 50% damage to the enemies, and would always try and compromise with the villains of the story.

        This idea of obviously scrapped because it would piss everyone off in the party.

        • keepcarrot [she/her]
          ·
          3 years ago

          It is as dumb and annoying as the "lawful stupid" version of Paladin and arguably the same thing (if applied a little differently)

        • regularassbitch [she/her]
          ·
          3 years ago

          this actually sounds really funny and you should try it until it pisses everyone off

        • Pisha [she/her, they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          The old rules for neutral druids stated that they would start helping the enemies if it looked like they were going to lose because that would upset the balance of nature. Always wondered how that would play out

  • sandinista209 [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Libs: “Violence is never the answer. Now let me explain why we need to turn Moscow to glass.”

    • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The :ukkkraine: flags in the bio lol

      Apparently defending yourself against violent homophobes is bad but shooting POWs in the knees is wholesome and nonviolent.

    • effervescent [they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Violence is never the answer. That’s why our answer involves you continuing to experience violent medical discrimination indefinitely

  • FlakesBongler [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Ah, my favorite Lib position, that if you just ask nicely and vote, maybe in 20 years you can have a lukewarm fish of a step towards equal rights

    • invo_rt [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Exactly. Racism ended in 1865 and double ended in 1964. :joker-troll:

    • Vncredleader
      ·
      3 years ago

      Great Paine quote about that.

      It is a perversion of terms to say that a charter gives rights. It operates by a contrary effect — that of taking rights away. Rights are inherently in all the inhabitants; but charters, by annulling those rights, in the majority, leave the right, by exclusion, in the hands of a few. If charters were constructed so as to express in direct terms, "that every inhabitant, who is not a member of a corporation, shall not exercise the right of voting," such charters would, in the face, be charters not of rights, but of exclusion. The effect is the same under the form they now stand; and the only persons on whom they operate are the persons whom they exclude. Those whose rights are guaranteed, by not being taken away, exercise no other rights than as members of the community they are entitled to without a charter; and, therefore, all charters have no other than an indirect negative operation. They do not give rights to A, but they make a difference in favour of A by taking away the right of B, and consequently are instruments of injustice.

  • Grimble [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    if you asked this person how we should actually be helping LGBTQ+ communities, they'd probably give you some unintelligible lib spiel about Vooting in the right Bodies and Spaces or just block you

  • Crowtee_Robot [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Wish one: :frog-no-pretext:

    Wish two: :tank-deluxe:

    Wish three: :pit:

    Pro tip: You won't need the third wish if you do the first two :owl-wink:

    • MerryChristmas [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Screaming that "guns and violence aren't the answer" while depositing your monthly paycheck into some Nazi gofundme account so they can buy guns to do violence.