https://nitter.net/AlphaMasculini1/status/1527056029351043072?t=_XzCtDaeF4dju7pOvNwHwg&s=19
The point is women are easily stimulated and aroused through almost any part of their body
this man read a hentai comic and thought it was an accurate depiction of female anatomy.
That makes no sense. My wife tells me that the female orgasm is a myth
she's a doctor so she knows what she's talking about :expert-shapiro:
Some men (with foreskins) can get multiple orgasms.
spoiler
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE CIRCUMCISED
im dead
this is heaven and im dead
I've definitely had an annoying boner because of the rumbling of a diesel bus in my ass lol.
I've heard of large insertables but fitting a whole bus in your ass is impressive.
I shit you not, this is an actual law in SAUDI ARABIA about bikes.
"The left is violent" screeches ISIS and neo-nazis.
Sometimes, I can't blame Quebec for being dickish about their secularism.
Not even. He read the Book of Hosea and called the entire subject a wrap.
This guy really thinks women are riding around on their bicycles literally just cumming nonstop.
Once again the chuds imagine a world I'd much rather live in.
That's just dangerous driving. Studies show that cumming your brains out is roughly equivalent to a .22 BAC :very-smart:
America finally deciding to invest billions into infrastructure, not to improve quality of life, but to simply prevent women from enjoying long drives down bumpy pot-hole infested roads
I am like, uh, getting the feeling of coming in a gym, I'm getting the feeling of coming at home, I'm getting the feeling of coming backstage when I pump up, when I pose in front of 5,000 people, I get the same feeling, so I am coming day and night. I mean, it's terrific. Right? So you know, I am in heaven.
lmao it just got deleted for violating twitter's rules
i actually didn't realize weird misogynist pseudoscience was against twitter's rules. that's probably a good thing, but this was too funny to remove. :(
They only ever remove the funny dunkable stuff like Trump and this, and leave the subtle insidious rot
https://nitter.net/AlphaMasculini1 It's still here
Nope just kidding only the one about being jealous of a horse lol
These guys are terrifying. I can't imagine being that self-obsessed.
I'm not sure if it is, Twitter sometimes removes stuff if there's just enough reports. The unwritten policy of "shut up leave me alone I don't care".
women shouldn't ride bikes because their tiddies will get caught in the spokes
Lmao that thumbnail. "Women need to go back to 1600, but my ability to conceptualize women as people has been destroyed by porn so my idea of what that would look like is still completely cum brained"
Before the Jews invented feminism in 1960, every woman looked like Jessica Rabbitt :frothingfash:
Oh, what's this? Women have looked roughly the same for the last 20,000 years? Women didn't wear makeup and washed their hair with eggs?! Corsets were used for back support (cause skirts were heavy) and to impress other women?!?! THEY RODE BICYCLES?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Corsets were used for back support (cause skirts were heavy)
I'm confused about this one; I don't know how the load of wearing a skirt, even if it were made out of a wrought-iron cage, would end up getting distributed onto the mid-back.
I mean, I can feel the weirdness of a new weight distribution just wearing a fannypack. Old skirts were made of thick material with multiple layers, and crinolines/hoops kept all that heavy stuff off your legs so you could walk freely. Outer skirt layers were then worn outside the corset so they sat on all the scaffolding and not directly on your body. Bone-inlaid corsets could also be used like backbraces for heavy work, which is why poor women in some periods would wear them at their jobs and not just at home.
Also tightlacing was not the norm. Most corset wearers now tightlace because they want to achieve a specific aesthetic rather than use it functionally.
Old skirts were made of thick material with multiple layers, and crinolines/hoops kept all that heavy stuff off your legs so you could walk freely. Outer skirt layers were then worn outside the corset so they sat on all the scaffolding and not directly on your body.
I understand that, what I'm gettin at is, I don't understand how that would end up interacting with the areas of the back that the corset would be supporting ( basically T7-L3 on this chart going by the sources you gave me), since all that weight would be anchored at the top of the hip-bone. I'm just not seeing how the mechanics of it line up.
Bone-inlaid corsets could also be used like backbraces for heavy work, which is why poor women in some periods would wear them at their jobs and not just at home.
This part though makes more sense to me, as that's kinda how belts work. They're supposed to assist in keeping the spine in a neutral position when picking heavy things up off the ground; although belts aim to achieve this by making it easier for the lifter to generate intra-abdominal pressure in order to maintain a stable posture, whereas the corsets seem to just use hardpoints to both carry load directly, and to force the wearer to maintain a specific posture.
Bear in mind the more functional ones also had shoulder straps, so they were more like a harness. Strapless corsets and bustiers were more used by people whose job was to sit on fancy couches.
Laughing my ass off imagining a woman red faced with shaky knees getting off her bike after her morning ride to work. Also at the sentence “It is weird and disgusting.” referring to women riding bikes. Dog wtf have you ever seen a person on a bicycle what the fuck are they talking about
It’s 19th century calipers, you can easily find articles about bicycles being detrimental to maidenhood or whatever the fuck.
This was an actual claim for why women shouldn't ride trains. I think that's what you were going for.
I am ruthlessly studying the Bible for lessons on how to be a man.
The top 3 recurring themes so far are:
- Work
- Responsibility
- Providing (protection + resources)
:data-laughing:
I've been reading this tome that's been historically used by clergy to pacify the peasantry, and the top 3 recurring themes are:
-
Give your lord the grain
-
Responsibility (to give your lord the grain)
-
Providing for your family so that they too may one day give your lord the grain
Ah yes, the consequences of not following those are pretty dire. You'll end up in the oubliette, they say.
-
Err, interesting choice of photo. Idk if it'll convince the average man of the thesis.
Lmao at the photos that accompany each post. This has to be a bit. Please say this is a bit... :data-laughing:
that first picture is so fucking horny for something that's supposed to be bad
Weird chud shit aside, bikes or bicycles? Isn't that literally the same thing? Truly big brain moments here.
definitely not universal but that has to be the distinction here
i always hear bike for bicycle but i guess i don't know anyone with a motorcycle anyways
Good catch.
Truly a "the black ram is tupping your white ewe" framework.
I'm sorry, why was I supposed to hate Muslims again? Something about them treating women horribly?
But yeah, Castlevania's Dracula did nothing wrong.
