• supafuzz [comrade/them]
    ·
    7 months ago

    the U.S. industrial base being in China does seem like an obstacle yeah

  • happybadger [he/him]
    ·
    7 months ago

    During the first COVID supply crisis after China shut down, I remember:

    1. A door factory shutting down because they couldn't domestically source the parts for doors

    2. Freight truck factories shutting down production because they couldn't domestically source some small metal part

    3. Every utilities company facing critical shortages for repairs and maintenance, warning they were one natural disaster away from the electrical grid collapsing

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Every utilities company facing critical shortages for repairs and maintenance

      Still an issue, I work for a utility and lead times for things like high voltage transformers are still ~18 months or so from what I've been told

      Coincidentally, I also processed a shipment of smaller transformers that came thru from South Korea (which for us was unheard of)

      It's not ideal

      • bazingabrain [comrade/them]
        ·
        7 months ago

        so what youre telling me is that if a group of organized people wanted, they could take out the entire us electrical grid by blowing up a bunch of transformers?

        HUH

        • emizeko [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Attack on Nine Substations Could Take Down U.S. Grid (2014)

          https://spectrum.ieee.org/attack-on-nine-substations-could-take-down-us-grid

      • hotcouchguy [he/him]
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lead times on those have been that bad for at least 10 years

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      -Ammunition becoming more scarce and expensive because guess who makes almost every primer in almost every shell some-controversy

  • Kaplya
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I have said it before and I will say it again: people still pretend like American imperialism is still rooted in industrial prowess. That era is long gone.

    No, America is a landlord/rentier capitalist and as such will always behave like a landlord.

    A landlord does not have to work. I repeat, a landlord does not work. A landlord extracts what other people have worked hard on.

    American tech giants like Microsoft and Google aren’t dominating the market because they are the most competent at making the best products out there. No, they dominate because they were able to leverage on various legal and financial means to bully their competitors out of the business, and they are able to do so precisely because the sector works just like a rentier economy. Every time you use their product, you (or your employer) pays a rent to those companies.

    America is never going to re-industrialize because industrialization raises the price of labor, and thus confers labor with leverages against capital. America didn’t de-industrialize itself in the first place for nothing. It de-industrializes itself precisely to defeat the trade unions and working class movements that had been gaining momentum by the 1970s.

    This is how US imperialism functions. Nobody is ever going to invade America so long as it has nukes at its disposal. And as long as the dollar reigns supreme, it will continue to behave like a landlord that extracts concessions from all over the world.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      7 months ago

      Incidentally, this is a fantastic read on the subject https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2021/08/the-value-of-nothing-capital-versus-growth/

      • Greenleaf [he/him]
        ·
        7 months ago

        That was a great read. I’m working my way through vol 2 of Capital. In it, Marx talks about how it’s in the sphere of production only where value is created. Distribution, beyond what is technically necessary, does not add value. I think this is particularly relevant for the non-financial sector of the US economy - Apple, Nike, Gap, even Amazon and Walmart to an extent. For the most part, these firms are not creating surplus value, they are extracting surplus value from, for example, contracting factories in the global south. That strikes me as inherently unstable: all it takes for much of the surplus value in the non-financial sector to just evaporate is for imperialism to be severed.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh yeah, very much agree with all that. And I've only got through the fist volume myself so far, really gotta read the rest. 😅

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      ·
      7 months ago

      American tech giants like Microsoft and Google aren’t dominating the market because they are the most competent at making the best products out there. No, they dominate because they were able to leverage on various legal and financial means to bully their competitors out of the business, and they are able to do so precisely because the sector works just like a rentier economy. Every time you use their product, you (or your employer) pays a rent to those companies.

      This is why they're so fucking scared of Huawei and Bytedance

    • meth_dragon [none/use name]
      ·
      7 months ago

      tbf losing a hot war w/ china would def help the dedollarization process one way or another, main problem is dedollarizing via nuclear winter is less than ideal

    • peeonyou [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It's even more involved than just the renting. US imperialism demands large consolidation in order to exert control over the markets. Tech giants are supremely important to consolidate because they offer all of the intelligence any empire could want, thus it is in the interest of the empire to ensure that a handful of giants rise, and those giants run uncontested.

  • HexbearGPT [comrade/them]
    ·
    7 months ago

    Capitalism builds industry for war.

    Socialism builds industry for human needs.

    Simple as.

    • carpoftruth [any, any]M
      ·
      7 months ago

      Except not even - if that was the case then ukraine would be winning instead of getting rinsed.

        • hotcouchguy [he/him]
          ·
          7 months ago

          Capitalism innovated a way to do war profiteering without all that pesky industrial production

  • pooh [she/her, any]
    ·
    7 months ago

    The idea that the US could even hope to “resolve key challenges” here is laughable. China is too far ahead in manufacturing and companies aren’t willing to spend the massive amounts of money required to expand manufacturing in the US.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, this is delusional beyond belief. Most people don't realize just how dependent on China US is today. For example:

      Show

      https://edconway.substack.com/p/globalisation-is-a-far-far-bigger

      • supafuzz [comrade/them]
        ·
        7 months ago

        Love when my grand interconnected system is really a single point of failure

      • jackalope@lemmy.ml
        ·
        7 months ago

        Posting numbers from 2018 is an insufficient insight into the situation though as there has been reported increased decoupling following covid.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          7 months ago

          US industrial output is currently shrinking, the decoupling is just talk with no substance to it

          • https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-03/us-manufacturing-activity-shrinks-by-most-in-three-years
          • https://www.barrons.com/news/us-manufacturing-activity-shrinks-more-quickly-in-february-e0674cd7
          • jackalope@lemmy.ml
            ·
            7 months ago

            Right because (as I understand it) the decoupling is shifting to nearshore/friendshore operations like Mexico and Japan.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
              hexagon
              ·
              7 months ago

              Not when you account for intermediate inputs. While end products might be made in Mexico or Japan, those will almost certainly rely in intermediate components manufactured in China:

              Show

              https://edconway.substack.com/p/globalisation-is-a-far-far-bigger

              • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                ·
                7 months ago

                Right and that chart only goes up to 2018 so I'd like to see a similar chart updated for post covid. Do you happen to know of one?

                        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                          hexagon
                          ·
                          7 months ago

                          Feel free to provide evidence to support your unsubstantiated claims. So far it looks like what's actually happening US is actively becoming more dependent on China. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202403/1308390.shtml

                          • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                            ·
                            7 months ago

                            I'm not making claims. I'm asking for more info because what you gave was insufficient.

                            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                              hexagon
                              ·
                              7 months ago

                              You literally claimed things changed fundamentally earlier without any evidence to back that up. You haven't even bothered to substantiate your assertion that the ample evidence you were already provided with is insufficient.

                              • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                                ·
                                7 months ago

                                Incorrect. I said that there is reported decoupling. Your chart doesn't cover the period of the supposed decoupling so I'm requesting information that covers that period too. That is all I have said or requested. Quote me otherwise. I've been very careful with how I've written.

                                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                                  hexagon
                                  ·
                                  7 months ago

                                  Unless you can provide actual evidence that some dramatic changed happened during that period, then there's no point to continue this discussion. Your whole argument hinges on an assumption that you've provided no basis for.

                                          • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                                            ·
                                            7 months ago

                                            I am not asserting there is decoupling. There is reported decoupling and I'm asking for a counter perspective. This really isn't that hard.

                                            • ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]M
                                              ·
                                              7 months ago

                                              post a link to this “reported decoupling”. a link with data, not speculation. the users above provided data of a trend of increased reliance on China for manufacturing inputs. if you have data that indicates the trend has reversed, show it to us. otherwise, you are just mindlessly guessing

                                              • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                                                ·
                                                7 months ago

                                                Bro, do you understand what a request for information is, or is everything a debate to you?

                                                • ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]M
                                                  ·
                                                  7 months ago

                                                  dont "bro" me. also ur the one being a debate pedant. users gave data about trade with China. then you made a claim that there was "reported decoupling" but didnt provide evidence. not only did you not provide evidence for decoupling, you didnt even provide evidence for the supposed reports. arguing in bad faith is against CoC. so stop being a debate pervert, stop arguing for the sake of arguing, and stop assuming you dont have to support your claims

                                    • Egon
                                      ·
                                      edit-2
                                      1 month ago

                                      deleted by creator

                                      • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                                        ·
                                        7 months ago

                                        I am not asserting decoupling. I am saying that I have been told there is decoupling by others and I'm asking for a counter perspective. This really isn't that hard.

                                        • Egon
                                          ·
                                          edit-2
                                          1 month ago

                                          deleted by creator

                                          • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                                            ·
                                            edit-2
                                            7 months ago

                                            Here is an example of this reporting: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-22/what-is-us-china-decoupling-and-how-is-it-happening

                                            TO BE CLEAR I AM NOT I AGREEMENT WITH THIS LINK. I AM NOT TAKING A POSITION ON THIS MATTER. I AM ONLY REQUESTING AN ALTERNATIVE VIEWPOINT BECAUSE I WANT TO BE INFORMED. THIS IS NOT A DEBATE.

                                            • Egon
                                              ·
                                              edit-2
                                              1 month ago

                                              deleted by creator

                                                • Egon
                                                  ·
                                                  edit-2
                                                  1 month ago

                                                  deleted by creator

                                                  • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                                                    ·
                                                    edit-2
                                                    7 months ago

                                                    No moron, you think you're in a debate because youre a keyboard warrior going aggro at the slightest interrupt of your circle jerk.

                                                    The only "assertion" I've made is that there has been reporting that there is decoupling between China and the US economies. And this is true! There is reporting! I'm not even claiming the reporting is correct, I've only requested alternative perspectives with evidence! That is all.

                                                    I have been very clear and up front from the beginning. You however are a dog chasing parked cars.

                                                    The issue is not a misunderstanding. It's you being an idiot.

                                                    I have not taken a stance anywhere in this thread about whether or not China and the US are decoupling. If this was otherwise you could prove it with a quote. But you can't. Because you're trying to fight someone who isn't interested in a debate. Idiot.

                                                    • Egon
                                                      ·
                                                      edit-2
                                                      1 month ago

                                                      deleted by creator

                                                      • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                                                        ·
                                                        edit-2
                                                        7 months ago

                                                        I'm literally the one saying this isn't a debate, dude.

                                                        I didn't lie. You're just an idiot.

                                                        • Egon
                                                          ·
                                                          edit-2
                                                          1 month ago

                                                          deleted by creator

                                                          • jackalope@lemmy.ml
                                                            ·
                                                            7 months ago

                                                            The only assertion I made was that there had been reporting of decoupling. I did not assert there had been decoupling. If you can't understand the difference between those two then I really can't help you. At worst I spoke sloppy to a pendant.

                    • bigboopballs [he/him]
                      ·
                      7 months ago

                      a lot has fundamentally changed in the last 5 years

                      No way, jack biden-alert

    • Tunnelvision [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You’d need to build new facilities and train people up to run lathes and whatnot. On top of that weapons aren’t made with steel and wood anymore so you’ll need to teach them some light programming too in order to mill your M4 receivers. In short America is fucked because free training in a high skill job is sacrilege here.

        • Tunnelvision [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I mean depending on how badly america wants to arm a million conscripts they might bring back open bolt stamped sheet metal rifles again. This is the land of idiot elites after all.

        • Hexbear2 [any]
          ·
          7 months ago

          I miss the grease gun. One of the greatest of all time.

  • Wheaties [she/her]
    ·
    7 months ago

    To deter a potential conflict with China, the United States must act quickly to resolve key challenges in its industrial base.

    to deter conflict we have to resolve the things that would make it difficult for us to have a conflict?

    also, cute animation, is that the only way to explain things to congressmen these days?

    • Egon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      deleted by creator

  • Elon_Musk [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I can't over emphasize how true this is. We would be in total ruin in a matter of months.

    Electrical shit in industrial manufacturing blows up all the time and stuff from 5 years ago is already obsolete.

    When something blows up that's obsolete you have 3 options. Adapt current generation parts at huge cost. Buy 1 of 3 used units left on the planet or repair your broken unit. Repairing your broken unit requires basic electronic parts that are likely manufactured in China and even rushed it can take weeks to get something repaired. Meanwhile your money printing machine sits idle.

    And so many more items made in China are essential to US manufacturering and are not easily replaced.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh yeah, supply chains are so incredibly complex nowadays. The only way you find out what you're missing is when you can't get it anymore. And given that China now accounts for something like 30% of global manufacturing, it's pretty much guaranteed that a lot of essential stuff will be gone if US ever decides to start a war with China.

      • Greenleaf [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I do think the crises of overproduction that Marx predicted have been mitigated in part by Just In Time production and lean inventories. However, that all comes at a cost - it makes the whole system much more fragile and if we ever see something like another world war or pandemic that shuts down global supply chains, the economic magnitude of that will be far beyond any simple crises of overproduction. The capitalists can mitigate it temporarily but it just means they’re kicking the can down the road.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          7 months ago

          I very much agree, just in time economy maximizes profit efficiency because you don't need to keep stores of commodities, but it creates fragility. As soon as you have some unexpected event like a ship getting stuck in the Suez canal, the whole global economy grinds to a halt. And unexpected stuff happens, that's just a fact of life. Factories have accidents, ships sink, wars start, droughts happen, etc. A fragile economy that spans the whole globe simply can't deal with these kinds of events in a reasonable way. So, I expect well be seeing more and more economic crises happening because the world is becoming more unstable overall and the economic house of cards the west built is starting to fall apart as a result.

    • peeonyou [he/him]
      ·
      7 months ago

      cyber attacks alone would probably do in our electrical grids

  • Hexbear2 [any]
    ·
    7 months ago

    The reality of a modern major war with China, an ocean away, with no logistical supply chain, is that it will be fought and over within weeks, culminating with the launch of nuclear weapons.

    • zed_proclaimer [he/him]
      ·
      7 months ago

      And if it doesn't result in exchange of nukes/ICBMs then it will quickly reach a stalemate where both sides' navies are either sunk via missiles/drones or pulled back to their own territory. From there it will descend into a proxy hybrid war, with asymmetrical cold war shit escalating all over the globe

        • Tunnelvision [they/them]
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah that sounds like a Chinese victory to me and unironically the proxy forces would be in Africa and maybe Europe.

  • Tabitha ☢️[she/her]
    ·
    7 months ago

    That would be hilarious if the US declared war, China's hardest battles will probably be the first few weeks of heavy bombing, then the US collapses instantly from a mysterious chicken shaped hole in their supply chain.

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh damn, always wild seeing a post about China on reddit before the feds started pushing all the anti-China stuff there. They actually treat it like a real country instead of the Evil Bad Place.

    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      ·
      7 months ago

      What? Of course USA will do everything it can to provoke China to go to war. Just look at what's happening in the Philippines. When Duerte was president everything was fine and there was peace in the area. Now that US puppet Marcos Jr is there, suddenly they need to build 4 MORE US military bases there. Now suddenly there's all sorts of collisions and arguments. Hmm...

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        ·
        7 months ago

        Duterte literally sponsored militias and death squads that murdered people for using recreational drugs. I don’t think we should say everything was “fine” under him…

      • iridaniotter [she/her, it/its]
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well then it's better for the USA to provoke a war that it will quickly lose than one where it might win

  • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    7 months ago

    Deterrence by Punishment did not work with Russia. These people are so dumb.,

    Just forsake Taiwan, shift your detente to Korea and Japan. What is the fucking point of potentially killing billions of people over an island the size of Maryland. You stupid fucks.

    • zed_proclaimer [he/him]
      ·
      7 months ago

      better yet, withdraw entirely from the Eurasian continent and let Japan and South Korea sort themselves out with the neighbors.

    • junebug2 [comrade/them, she/her]
      ·
      7 months ago

      If Maryland produced 60% of the worlds’ semiconductors and was the only place that could make 3 nm chips, then more countries might be willing to risk global catastrophe over Maryland. Taiwan is a golden goose for most of the US economy that positively contributes to the line going up, and semiconductor manufacturing is one of the last technological edges the “West” has. The Department of Defense and its corporate halo are perpetually in a contrived state of disarray when it comes to talking about things that need money, from their supply chains to research. While it’s true that price gouging and rent seeking probably don’t lead to good weapon systems, I think the people writing this article are assuming the average policymaker already is onboard with the necessity of Taiwan, and they are emphasizing a shopping list of things that need evermore endless funding. If we ever actually went to war with China, then all these weapons companies would need to start making more weapons and less money.

      • Hexbear2 [any]
        ·
        7 months ago

        The US will blow a trillion dollars on a failed F-35 program, but won't even build up its own semiconductor manufacturing industry. The US truly is fucked.

    • Hexbear2 [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      America won WWII through recycling model Ts and other crap we had laying around in landfills and turning it into ships planes and tanks. We shipp all our scrap to other countries these days, there is no reserve to quickly ramp up new production lines. In fact, China built some of their infrastructure on the bones of American waste, even including the scrap we sent over from the world trade center and the solar panels that Carter put on the white house. America is so fucked in any conflict with China. America couldn't even beat Illiterate Afghani with busted-up AK-47s who never even heard of 9-11.

      • bigboopballs [he/him]
        ·
        7 months ago

        America won WWII

        they didn't have that much to do with it, honestly

  • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    7 months ago

    In some cases, there are also single sources for key components and sub-components.

    The Javelin, for instance, relies on a rocket motor—the Aerojet Rocketdyne’s advance solid-propellant rocket motor—without a second source at the moment. There is one company, Williams International, that builds turbofan engines for most cruise missiles, such as the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile-Extended Range, and Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile. There is one main company, PacSci EMC, that produces the energetics for most missiles. There is also one foundry that can produce the large titanium castings for some important weapons systems.

    xi-gun