https://nitter.pussthecat.org/ninaism/status/1623273497479749632

  • FourteenEyes [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are like "AI will plunge us into a world where we cannot discern truth from lies" but it's more like "AI will plunge us into a world where photographs are not considered serious evidence without extensive provenance attached"

    • ssjmarx [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you ready for a future where the libs cry for war against China using an obvious deepfake and anyone pointing it out is called a bot?

      • FourteenEyes [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well we already have a present where they do that without a photograph

      • Lurker123 [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Weren’t the Uighur prisoner photos like 6 months ago?

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The nice thing about AI being accessible is that if you can figure out the prompt, you can regenerate an image

      • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing is that ai is random generation for the initial seed so you can't actually get the same output for same initial prompt

        • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but you can traverse the state space by iterating through the seeds. Which means if you wanted you could find the exact match, but all you really need is something that's 80% a match to tell that it's generated

          • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            this is one of the reasons I'm not as terribly afraid of AI as a lot of people seem to be. Seems like there are going to be very clear ways to run an AI image backwards through some process to identify certain features as computer generated. I don't know shit about programming or machine learning, but if an AI is able to make an image, it seems reasonable to me for a different AI to have the ability to deconstruct it and show exactly how the image was created.

    • VernetheJules [they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      without extensive provenance attached

      perhaps if they existed on some kind of decentralized ledger :thonk:

    • solaranus
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I need a hug

    Hope there's a riot police officer around

    Really nuzzle deep into their neck and gas mask

    Riot police officers love when you approach and try to grab them

    Seriously how :galaxy-brain: do you have to be to even imagine this

    Wonder how many revisions they did because the woman wasn't hot enough

    • edge [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really nuzzle deep into their neck and gas mask

      So you can take it off.

  • WhyEssEff [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI generated riot cop look out Inigo Montoya is right behind you oh god oh fuck he has airpods in he can't hear us oh the humanity

  • Findom_DeLuise [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are we just going to gloss over that garishly long thumb that just sort of juts out of the side of his hand? On the other hand, if this is real, then this dude was definitely one of the kids used by the focus group that designed the Nintendo 64 controller.

  • plinky [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn, people watching tv news would have even more tenuous connection with reality huh

  • Abraxiel
    ·
    1 year ago

    The officer is just a nephil, actually

  • NPa [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    :scared: Random thought, AI companies are creating these errors on purpose as a red herring so that when actually important deep-fakes are needed, they can turn off the "make hands look fucked up" setting and point to the perfectly regular 5-fingered hand as proof that the image is real.

  • PROMIS_ring [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    look at the riot gear too, its just random straps and velcros and pockets

    and its struggling to get a coherently shaped visor if you look closely. censoring out the fake AI letters and badges is a nice touch.

    it might pass at a glance tho

    edit - ok but he admit it tho

    idk what this guy thinks he is doing why post this :why-post-this:

    the original tweet https://nitter.kavin.rocks/WebCrooner/status/1623253566763720704

    i ran the first pic thru CLIP interrogator, here is the results

    Interrogating with ViT-L/14... 100%|███████████████████████████████████████| 890M/890M [00:15<00:00, 59.9MiB/s] 1 entry Filter

    index Model Medium Artist Trending Movement Flavors
    0 ViT-L/14 a photo (32.7%) by Mathieu Le Nain (2.5%) trending on unsplash (30.0%) neo-romanticism (32.2%) renaissance painting (16.9%), associated press photo (12.9%), dystopian art (9.9%)

    a man in a helmet hugging a woman, a photo by Mathieu Le Nain, trending on unsplash, neo-romanticism, renaissance painting, associated press photo, dystopian art

  • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    There's also the totally insane looking visors and gas masks that don't actually look like any real existing gas mask.