We just walked out and quit the study today. Stanford medical dropped all masking requirements and the researchers running the long-Covid paxlovid study have stopped masking while tending to long covid participants. It’s frankly abhorrent, selfish behavior, and not only does it demonstrate a complete lack of regard and understanding for the illness in question, in my opinion it calls into question the legitimacy of the entire study. We’ve been traveling hundreds of miles for months in order to try to participate in their study and provide THEM with data about the illness, and this is what they think of us. Just want to make everyone aware in case you also have the misfortune of being a participant.
EDIT: Aside from the obvious lack of regard for the safety and well being of their patients/subjects, I should point out that this is also just a terrible choice for the study. Want to know how to get consistent study results? I'll give you a hint: it doesn't involve dramatically changing the study conditions 3/4 of the way through. Not only are they callously risking people's health, they risk invalidating the entire project and its data by suddenly increasing the odds of reinfecting their participants and negatively changing the course of their health.
What in damnation is wrong with these so-called scientists? Mao was right. All intellectuals need to be sent to their respective "countrysides". Doctors show disdain for their patients, researchers show disdain for their subjects, television show producers are out of touch with the equipment people own, city planners and architects often have no idea what residents what. Insanity. It's all insanity! :marx-joker:
They really do, and it fucking blows. Especially if you have a history of addiction that you've unfortunately let slip into their records. Doctors were jerks to me before that, but for the most part it was tolerable. But afterwards? It was like a switch flipped. I'm many years clean and I still get the cop treatment from doctors when they see opioid use disorder on my chart. They instantly stop taking anything I say seriously and instead they start scrutinizing everything, searching for the non-existent scam I'm running on them.
They tell you to chart everything, but I've definitely withheld shit when patients disclose stuff to me like I'm not charting sex work history because that gets you put into the "DrUg SeEKinG BeHavIor RiSk" bucket apparently to doctors. Which is annoying because it could have real implications for future care if they treated people like they were people.
Thank you for your service.
Right, it definitely gets people killed. It must happen all the time that someone with a history of addiction comes in with some legitimate pain stemming from an extremely dangerous medical condition. But instead of doing their jobs and finding out what is causing it, all too often the doctor chooses instead to give them a stern lecture and send them home with some tylenols. Pat on the back, hurray, we stopped a junkie from getting their next fix.
The medical system and the war on drugs it is subservient to is making the implicit choice that stopping someone from getting high is much more highly prioritized than making sure someone's cancer, or appendicitis, or kidney stones, etc is caught early. Or even caught at all, because experiences like these make people even more unwilling to see a doctor, as if the medical debt wasn't bad enough.
deleted by creator
It’s fucking infuriating. I had a doctor i wasn’t even seeing long term end my Xanax prescription because he thought I was an alcoholic.
1, I’m not an alcoholic, and wasn’t in the hospital for anything related to alcohol, I was in for depression and suicidal thoughts. They put me in the substance abuse unit because the psych unit was full.
2, Alcohol and Xanax are not the same thing! Having an alcohol abuse problem doesn’t make me suddenly likely to abuse Xanax that I haven’t been abusing for the last few years because I don’t like the feeling of Xanax
what did they do?
Here we have a program where your (already subsidised) education is free if you're in medicine or teaching and you agree to work in a rural area for 5 years.
Guess who prefers to pay $30,000?
The researchers care about keeping their research funding. And since this is apparently getting reported to Pfizer, they'll start to care soon: