The owner of the meat processing plant was ordered to pay a whopping $1143 to a teen who lost his hand in a meat grinder

Link to the article

  • btbt [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    In a proper country like China the business owners would be in front of a firing squad by now

    Edit: what the fuck did I just start

    • jabrd [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Contributing to the strugglesession by adding “oh yeah, then what happened to the owners of Foxconn?” and immediately doubling down when people point out that Foxconn is a Taiwanese company by saying “oh I thought Taiwan was part of China”

      • DoubleShot [he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not used to the federation thing yet, I saw this comment and assumed sarcasm, forgot there were dipshits out there that actually think this and that Adrian Zenz is a “reliable source”.

      • Rom [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Wait, you mean China? Have you even read the party planning bulletin?

        https://hexbear.net/PPB

          • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            11 months ago

            Nobody in the world other than libs and Adrian Zenz state there's a Uyghur genocide. Not a single country (least of all Muslim countries) and not even the UN.

            Even Adrian Zenz never said it was a genocide, that was invented whole cloth by Reddit libs like yourself.

              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                ·
                11 months ago

                "Why are you bringing up the guy I brought up as a source for my claims" lmao dumbass

              • Rom [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                "Bold statements for someone who didn't read a single linked source."

                "Who is this Adrian Zenz guy that was cited by name in every single source I linked?"

              • DoiDoi [comrade/them, he/him]
                ·
                11 months ago

                You don't realize it, but this is one of the funniest comments I've ever seen online. Thank you for that.

              • CloutAtlas [he/him]
                ·
                11 months ago

                Literally every single source of the Uyghur genocide goes back to a single study conducted by Adrian Zenz done on a sample size of 8 people from the same village "how many people do you know are in re-education camps", that % is extrapolated to the entire population of Xinjiang to get the estimates of incarceration, then it was published by Radio Free Asia. The millions of people in camps thing was different outlets reporting a singular article done by one guy named Adrian Zenz. Literally look at any article and look into it and they trace back to Radio Free Asia or Zenz.

                You can actually go to the Wikipedia article you linked, go to sources, go to the sources' sources and it traces back to Adrian Zenz interviewing 8 people.

              • btbt [he/him]
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s crazy what watching Vaush does to people’s brains. Just completely transformed into mulch overnight

              • Awoo [she/her]
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Because literally all of these claims attribute him as their source.

              • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
                ·
                11 months ago

                I challenge you to follow the citations of literally any article about the supposed genocide. Please I beg of you. It will lead back to the heritage foundation, where zenz works, or a DC thinktank citing the same study.

            • edge [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Victims: est. ≥1 million detained

              scroll down

              Part of a series on Genocide [skulls.jpg]

              Hmm, those two things don't seem to fit together.

          • DoiDoi [comrade/them, he/him]
            ·
            11 months ago

            You could have just said "actually I have no idea what I'm talking about" instead of linking wikipedia

            • quindraco@lemm.ee
              ·
              11 months ago

              That's a weird way to spell "I am too incompetent to click on the links to secondary sources for what I want vetted", but here you go.

              First claim I made: https://www.un.org/ar/preventgenocide/adviser/pdf/osapg_analysis_framework.pdf

              Second claim: https://apnews.com/article/269b3de1af34e17c1941a514f78d764c

              https://www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/china-forces-birth-control-uighurs-suppress-population

              https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22311356/china-uyghur-birthrate-sterilization-genocide

              https://www.dw.com/en/china-uighur-women-reportedly-sterilized-in-attempt-to-suppress-population/a-54018051

              https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-53220713

              • CloutAtlas [he/him]
                ·
                11 months ago

                Every single source you linked literally refers to Adrian Zenz as their source.

                The guy who is a senior fellow at the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation.

                The foundation that was authorised by the US Congress in 1993.

                You're quoting news sources quoting a once-removed US government employee on their political and economic rival. This is why people are dunking on you.

                Have you ever heard of Manufacturing Consent, btw?

              • DoiDoi [comrade/them, he/him]
                ·
                11 months ago

                Linking wikipedia just screams out that you don't actually examine your own sources of info that you already agree with. This is made obvious as shit by the fact that you linked 5 different sources that all go back to Zenz lmao

          • HighOnCopium [she/her]
            ·
            11 months ago

            I was reading this reply chain and was like, “Please don’t use Wikipedia as a source please don’t use Wikipedia as a source please don’t use Wikipedia as a source” and- farquaad-point

            • quindraco@lemm.ee
              ·
              11 months ago

              That's a weird way to spell "I am too incompetent to click on the links to secondary sources for what I want vetted", but here you go.

              First claim I made: https://www.un.org/ar/preventgenocide/adviser/pdf/osapg_analysis_framework.pdf

              Second claim: https://apnews.com/article/269b3de1af34e17c1941a514f78d764c

              https://www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/china-forces-birth-control-uighurs-suppress-population

              https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22311356/china-uyghur-birthrate-sterilization-genocide

              https://www.dw.com/en/china-uighur-women-reportedly-sterilized-in-attempt-to-suppress-population/a-54018051

              https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-53220713

              • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
                ·
                11 months ago

                Damn dude. 5 sources for your second claim but every single one of them references Adrian Zenz. So really it's only one source. One source that is already debunked.

                • Rom [he/him]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Wait, I'm supposed to actually read the sources I provide? I thought I could just copy and paste links I found on Wikipedia to automatically win the argument.

                  • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I can't believe my heckin' wholesome trustworthy BeeBeeCeerino would cite a report they didn't even read drafted by a fringe lunatic reactionary that can't even do basic 6th grade math wojak-nooo

                    • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
                      ·
                      11 months ago

                      Dude come on, you're using documents you barely read or half remember to argue with people who casually and easily debunked the documents that hold up your entire worldview and we did it 2 or more years ago. You are in way over your head.

                        • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
                          ·
                          11 months ago

                          Uh yeah I did, and I'm not the only one. I was permanently banned from Reddit for doing it lol. I realize you are probably inundated with replies dunking on you right now, but check my replies to your recent posts. I literally cited the document that disproves Zenz's own report that he himself cites.

                    • Rom [he/him]
                      ·
                      11 months ago

                      I'm not the one using Wikipedia to back up my argument lmao.

              • CyborgMarx [any, any]
                ·
                11 months ago

                jesse-wtf Motherfucker did you just cite Adrian Zenz? lmao Jesus that's so on the nose

          • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You linked to a Wikipedia page that displays a picture of people listening to a speech at a drug rehab facility claiming it is Uyghurs undergoing a genocide. This same page also references Adrian Zenz, who lies once in his original report where he says sterilizations are his biggest evidence of genocide and immediately proceeds to miscalculate the number of IUDs in Xinjiang as being 80% of IUDs in all of China, and then he lies a second time in a follow up where he replies to somebody pointing out his source doesn't support this claim by claiming he was actually calculating only new IUD insertions in Xinjiang being 80% of new IUD insertions in China, which is also false according to his own calculation and source.

            https://i.imgur.com/Zsi11eh.jpg

            Top: total number in China. Bottom: Xinjiang's number. That's 8.7% of IUD insertions. Not 80%.

              • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
                ·
                11 months ago

                Just taking all this data at face value would lead us to believe that the CPC are genociding the region of Henan because ???Communism gives you genocide urges you have to act upon???

          • Awoo [she/her]
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            In particular, forced abortions and sterilizations

            Oh boy you should probably not look up what the US is doing in the concentration camps it keeps on its border then. Something we have real evidence of not made up nonsense lmao

          • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]
            hexagon
            ·
            11 months ago

            Based on percent of total population, Uyghurs are the second fastest growing ethnic group in all of China. Who are they second to? Tibetans.

            If you think China is doing genocide via birth control, remind me not to get birth control from China

          • Flinch [he/him]
            ·
            11 months ago

            Genocide is when you have ~17,000 mosques, and the more mosques you have the more genocidal it is theory-gary

      • Fuckass
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • Hohsia [he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        As opposed to the bourgeois dictatorship of the US

        PIGPOOPBALLS

      • GaveUp [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The Telmarines had it coming, don't defend them lol

              • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                You've already demonstrated such thorough ignorance about basic politics that I do in fact know for sure you're not a leftist.

            • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]
              ·
              11 months ago

              they have to check with the senate parliamentarian to see if such a thing can be proposed during this phase of the moon, or if acting to quickly to prevent children from being maimed by bosses for money would violate norms and rules. our government is far too complex of a machine to do anything quickly, except send several billion dollars of cluster bombs anywhere on the planet in 36 hours.

              i'm sure someone is working on a subsidized loan so that the kid can purchase a new hand using his HSA and that he loan will be forgiven if he starts a small business in an underserved community and maintains operations for 3 years.

              • GriffithDidNothingWrong [comrade/them]
                ·
                11 months ago

                Well, no, but his mom did set up a gofundme to aquire him a hook as he is no longer able to pull himself up by his boot straps. At present the total sits at $4.20 one of his friends put in there. He will be able to collect disability provided he participates in all degrading means tests and doesn't make too much supplementary income. We wouldn't want him living too well after all.

          • AcidSmiley [she/her]
            ·
            11 months ago

            AmeriKKKa doesn't have a left in its political system, only right and far right. Anywhere else in the world, liberalism is correctly viewed as the capital-serving, people-maiming right-wing ideology it is. Give it less than a decade and the GOP will have made "child labor in sawmills, mines and slaughterhouses is cool and good, actually" a bipartisan stance, just as they have normalized torture at blacksites, dronestriking civilians abroad, unprecedented mass surveilance on a scale never before known to man and internment camps on the border. You liberals have accepted all of these as the new status quo, you will do the same with child labor, as is evidenced by the fact that there is zero pushback against this from Democrats on the federal level. They're just waiting until people get used to the latest atrocity, like they always do.

          • Fuckass
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • Hohsia [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              “It’s fine to kill random people in sovereign countries if I have the veneer of the military industrial complex, but consequences for the powerful abusing their power to exploit is where I draw the line. You do realize that we can enact strict regulations to stop them, right?”

              liberalism

              For the record, the death penalty probably wouldn’t even happen in this case. So we get another instance of someone crying about a hypothetical they made up

          • Hohsia [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            What no analysis of material conditions does to a mf

            Did you ever consider the possibility that the right can have the correct take on things, albeit for extremely deluded reasons

        • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          More that it wouldn't happen. There'd be a criminal trial and actually serious fines, but I doubt execution would be on the table. That's generally reserved for stuff like murder, treason, and schnif so on.

      • combat_brandonism [they/them]
        ·
        11 months ago

        welcome to hexbear! we have "Post"-based posting etiquette here, please let me know if you want more info