Europe has colonized itself so many times I'm not sure these borders would make any major difference. Major props for taking the panhandle away from Austria, however. They never do anything with it anyway.
We infected half of Europe with coronavirus from it in March.
it's not fair that even in this alternate reality ireland is still divided while scotland and wales are independent
Norway would be split into one large stretch of basically nothing and several small states where all the oil is
arabia-ized norway oh my lord. and every well is owned by some absurdly wealthy jarl
I mean, the oil is all off shore, so not sure how that would work.
Not looking forward to this, glad I live in a part of the country that has no oil off the coast.
Yeah that looks just about right. Compares pretty well to the levant and west africa. OP was missing all the random jutting rectangles
It still respects language barriers too much. Country names still correspond to cultures. God I fucking hate what colonialism did to most of the world
The borders appear to be deliberately "wrong" to make a point about how ridiculous borders are in the colonized world.
Didn't Felix have a bit about Ohio guys going on birthright trips to Germany?
The problem with the European-drawn borders in Africa is more the way that they tended to cut ethnic groups in half, and also group different groups together and arbitrarily pick one group to be in charge (often because people in that group tended to have lighter skin). The unnatural straight borders (not that any borders are natural, but you get what I mean) are less of a problem in anf of themselves, it's about what they symbolize
Losing Limburg do Belgium.
Sounds like an amazing deal, how do we make this happen?
