America Is Running Out of Everything The global supply chain is slowing down at the very moment when Americans are demanding that it go into overdrive. By Derek Thompson

  • Oso_Rojo [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    That’s why Joe Biden's Build Back Better plan includes billions of dollars to reshore manufacturing, invest in basic research, and beef up domestic supply chains.

    Even if this plan is fully funded and realized, isn’t it just inevitable it’ll all end up overseas again because of the pursuit of profit? Unless the federal gov subsidizes it for the rest of time.

    • FidelCashflow [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah, there is no market solution to this. This declining rate of profit is one of the key contradictions marx talks about

        • LeninWeave [none/use name]
          ·
          3 years ago

          You can look up "Tendency for the Rate of Profit to Fall", but it's essentially (very condensed) the hypothesis that more automation makes things less profitable (because added value comes from labor), which is one of the reasons capitalism will inevitably collapse on itself.

          • Atavist [none/use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Bold of you to assume my ADHD will allow me to look it up.

            Jokes aside, can I get an example or scenario where

            automation makes things less profitable

            This happens? (Easier for me to understand it conceptually that way)

            Or you can ignore das ok.

            • LeninWeave [none/use name]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              Edited preface: in writing my simplified explanation, I did butcher this a bit. As SadStruggle92 points out below, what's meant by "labor" here is the average labor necessary to produce a given commodity, not the labor of a specific worker. It's the socially-necessary labor-time, the actual basis for the Labor Theory of Value.

              IE someone taking three times as long to make something as the average worker adds the same amount of value, rather than three times as much - which, incidentally, is a gotcha a lot of liberals who've never read Marx think they've found in the LTV. The below is only meant as a quick explanation, please read Capital if you really want all the detail.


              It's as @Alaskaball said, to decrease costs companies automate more. This means less labor. Since labor is the only thing that can really actually create value, less labor necessary means less value added means less profit.

              For example, if a worker makes widgets and produces $100 an hour of value, he might only be paid $20. This is $80 of profit for the owner of the factory. Let's assume that the whole industry is like this, at a kind of cost-profit equilibrium.

              Now, there's a technological innovation and that worker is replaced by a machine that only costs $10 per hour to run. For a short amount of time, the owner will make more, but as that automation spreads around to competitors he'll be forced to decrease the sale price to compete, until he can no longer decrease it further (i.e. tends towards no profit, only covering costs of machine).

              Or, in other words, machines can only impart the value they hold (investment to buy and maintain them) into products, since they do no labor. Workers alone can produce added value. Honestly, I feel like I'm kind of butchering it, but Capital covers it pretty well IIRC.

                • LeninWeave [none/use name]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  All possible responses, yeah. Marx also had a list of things that help (temporarily) raise the rate of profit, which I'm going to copy from Wikipedia.

                  • More intense exploitation of labor (raising the rate of exploitation of workers).
                  • Reduction of wages below the value of labor power (the immiseration thesis).
                  • Cheapening the elements of constant capital by various means.
                  • The growth of a relative surplus population (the reserve army of labor) which remained unemployed.
                  • Foreign trade reducing the cost of industrial inputs and consumer goods.
                  • The increase in the use of share capital by joint-stock companies, which devolves part of the costs of using capital in production on others.

                  There's an economist (several, I think, but one that I know of off the top of my head) who's sort of made demonstrating the TRPF hypothesis his life's work. He's got a blog at thenextrecession.wordpress.com if you're interested in seeing modern, real-world data related to this.

              • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                Can't all the capitalists just form a cartel and not actually lower prices and compete with each other?

                It's like how they can probably make lightbulbs that last way longer but everyone decided not to. Dubai specially ordered longer lasting ones that can only be sold there.

                • s0ykaf [he/him]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  It’s like how they can probably make lightbulbs that last way longer but everyone decided not to.

                  i don't think that's how it really happens, it's just that you as a consumer can't really see too far beyond the price tag, that would require perfect information that you don't really have (except in extreme cases)

                  programmed obsolescence is not exactly a conscious choice by all capitalists, it's just an expression of how shit the price system becomes after a certain level of productivity - living in a reality of scarcity, you tend to buy whatever is cheaper because you don't really know how much longer a more expensive choice would last, which makes those products more competitive, which, in turn, forces capitalists to make that choice

                  it's a downward spiral of waste and overconsumption that everyone is basically forced into just because of how capitalism works

                • LeninWeave [none/use name]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  You're right. I'm familiar with the concept of socially-necessary labor-time, but I was trying to do an ELI5 and unfortunately butchered it a bit in the process. I simply meant that labor has to be necessary to add value.

                  The point being that, if everything is completely automated everywhere, socially-necessary labor-time to produce anything is zero. No labor to be done, no surplus value to be extracted, no profit.

                  Gonna edit my post to point out it's the average necessary labor that counts, thanks for pointing it out.

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
              hexagon
              MA
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              Nice and basic, automation and mass-production increases supply, which as you guess makes shit more available which in turn makes it less valuable, which makes the product less profitable, which then drives for more automation to replace expensive workers to cut costs and boost profit, then repeat from the top until the market crashes.

            • Caocao [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Labor is the only commodity that can be bought by a capitalist at less than its value, because its not sold by a capitalist. This is the source of all profit from capitalist enterprises. When capitalists replace workers with machines, they pay full value for the machines (can't exploit them) so they stop making profits. Also the workers they laid off no longer have money to buy whatever commodities they're selling.

        • FidelCashflow [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Leofits by nature have to fall over time. Eventuall you will sell a toaster to everyone that needs a toaster. If the market opens up enough there will eb competition meaning you make less. Toasters will fall out of fashion. Parts get cheaper because you have made enough toasters to develop an econony fo scale. In a logistical sense the there is only so much money to be made in any one way. That's why they keep releasing new models of stiff. A hundred other ways I am sure. However if the business logic is to do what makes the most money. And it is. The only actions you can isentivize the market to produce are ones liek what we have already seen.

          So if biden spends a billion to make a factory, it will just automate and offshore as those are the actions incentivized by the market.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      This is always a good point to bring up with left-leaning folks who are still holding on to the idea that some heavily-regulated form of capitalism might be OK. Even if you manage the gargantuan task of putting even basic limits on capitalism to mitigate its worst effects, those limits are just going to get chipped away again in a few decades at most. Capitalism is corrosive to any restrictions applied to it.

      • Des [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        my younger dumbass lib self used to say "capitalism is a raging river and we just have to dam it to make it useful". i guess the analogy while libshit sort of still makes sense if the river is made of sulfuric acid

    • Quimby [any, any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Also, this is like how they've found that expanding roads doesn't actually reduce traffic, because more people drive as a result.

      "Surely we can grow our way out of this growth problem!"

  • Elon_Musk [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    we’re also suffering from a dearth of a shocking array of things—test kits, car parts, semiconductors, ships, shipping containers, workers.

    One of these things is not like the other

  • RedArmor [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    There are decades when you fuck around and weeks when you find out.

        • Quimby [any, any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          lmao. though I was thinking more of a "please metaphorically nuke us with communism".

          • LeninWeave [none/use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            That's exactly what I'M saying. :posadas: :possadist-ufo: :hexbear-posadist: :xi-plz: :nuke: :posadist-nuke: :posad: :communism-will-win:

  • deadbergeron [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    saw this article during an anger-scroll through r/lockdownskepticism. Most comments: "See! We told you lockdowns didn't work!" Yeah, this is definitely because of lockdowns, not, like, a global pandemic that has overwhelmingly affected workers and which many countries continue to refuse to appropriately deal with.

    My favorite comment:

    And I bet this article did not say "lockdowns" or vaccine mandates or mask mandates or super unemployment benefits. The media willfully created the covid hysteria, supported lockdowns, but won't admit that government policy they incited are causing this!

    You would be correct. Nary a word about lockdowns , vaccine mandates or mask mandates.

    This just in! Mask mandates have destroyed the global supply chain!

    Link cause I'm not a lib

    Also I love Americans who have like pretty much no restrictions at this point, but continue to act as if they're being forced at gunpoint to remain in their homes. Like, you want to go out to eat so bad, just do it, don't whine about a fake lockdown.

          • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Cmon I love hexbear but like half of what we do here is just post shit for each other to get mad at together

          • deadbergeron [he/him,they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            yeah there are definitely good vibes on this site. i do have to be careful to take breaks often though or i will just start making myself mad, especially from the_dunk_tank. going through r/lockdownskepticism once every couple of months isn't too bad, I already get all those arguments from my friends anyway

            • LeninWeave [none/use name]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              i do have to be careful to take breaks often though or i will just start making myself mad, especially from the_dunk_tank

              I'm going to shill the megathreads. You ever post in the megathreads? Good vibes in the megathreads.

              • deadbergeron [he/him,they/them]
                ·
                edit-2
                3 years ago

                i gotta get back into the megathreads. i used to exclusively look at the megathreads when we were on the subreddit, but now on the new site i rarely look/post in them

            • CopsDyingIsGood [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Yeah the dunk tank is bad and imo should only exist to quarantine that type of thing to one comm

      • bort_simp_son [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        They'll spend the next 20 years acting like that one-time unemployment boost was a permanent UBI.

  • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Quote : " Many of these materials have to be imported from or travel through East Asia. But that region is dealing with the Delta variant,"

    Speak : Its not like we dont have the Delat varient , its just that we dont "Deal" with it...

  • twitter [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    America reportedly "all out of ideas" after "asking for the supply chain's manager" gambit fails to produce much needed treats

    More on these shocking developments after a word from our sponsors

  • cybernetsoc [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Just love the chef's kiss at the end of quoting Ezra Klein and "Supply-Side Progressivism".

    "Maybe instead of trying to redistribute scarce resources, we increase the supply for everyone. Which is why socialists and progressives should push for YIMBYism and reduced zoning regulations to allow a greater housing supply" - Ezra Klein, pretty much

    Liberals just love this Voxism of "What if we try to solve problems of capitalism and markets with more neo-liberalism! And we will say this is progressive and left wing since we are baselessly asserting it will improve things and solve problems."

    • LeninWeave [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      :porky-scared-flipped: "THE MARKET WILL SOLVE THIS", I scream to no one as the angry masses beat down my front door and trample me to death.

    • steve5487 [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Maybe instead of trying to redistribute scarce resources, we increase the supply for everyone

      but the resources are scarce though

    • SteamedHamberder [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The only instance I'm aware of "supply side" solution to health care is Cuba though. They've deliberately oversupplied the market with Doctors, and send their surplus overseas. The problem with health care is for every supply, there is a requirement for some type of skilled professional to either QC the product or interpret the result. Even with the examples of at-home COVID tests and prescriptions- there's a shortage of Pharmacists, Pharm techs, and production techs.

      • steve5487 [none/use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        there’s a shortage of Pharmacists

        I might just be ignorant here but doesn't a pharmacist get something off a shelf

        • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Pharmacy techs are the ones who get stuff off shelves and who usually hand you drugs which is a 3 year diploma. They also do other stuff but are overseen by a pharmacist.

          Pharmacists need to know more about drug interactions than doctors do and usually a pharmacy only has one or two pharmacists total, who usually own the pharmacy but sometimes don't. Which is some sort of undergrad plus 4 years of pharmacist school that you test into like law or medical school.

          It's like how nurses do most of the medical stuff at hospitals but you still need doctors.

          • D3FNC [any]
            ·
            3 years ago

            It's incredible how almost everything in this post is wrong. It's a four year degree, you'd have to go back a century for pharmacists to own their own pharmacies, nurses do nursing, not "medical stuff" - and most of this has to do with legal liability for malpractice.

            Doctors and pharmacists have professional degrees and are held liable for mistakes. Nurses and pharmacy techs are held to a dramatically lower standard, usually they only get fired unless they're stealing drugs.

          • BruceWillis [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            the insane amount of schooling and barriers to entry are as much about weeding out people who will steal/abuse the powerful drugs they have access to by making it a hard to get and therefore a high paying job.

          • steve5487 [none/use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Oh OK I did think that the fact there were exams meant there was more to it than grabbing something behind you

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Maybe instead of trying to redistribute scarce resources we simply distribute them equitably in the first place, instead of handing them all to a handful of pedophile lizard oligarchs?

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
      ·
      3 years ago

      the bizarre thing is he doesn't even need to make these poorly reasoned appeals to socialists. lord knows we're not a huge constituency. i think he just likes the aesthetic and wants to be an internet cool kid.

      • cybernetsoc [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Well, I think he is appealing to standard liberals. The whole project of Vox is to launder Neo-Liberalism and "Market based solutions" as "woke" and progressive. Like, for example, I remember an early article about how great charter schools are because then a hypothetical Black family could have the choice to send their child to a charter school that focuses on Black history and culture, if there were enough Black families desiring that that the market would allow it. It is continuing the Clintonian project of having very far right neo-liberal politics that favor an affluent PMC person in the suburbs, while telling themselves that the are moral and progressive.

    • bort_simp_son [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      "cApItAliSm iSn'T A zErO-sUm GaMe!" they shriek despite all evidence to the contrary.

  • TankieTanuki [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    unemployment insurance and several rounds of stimulus have allowed laid-off workers to be picky about jobs, instead of desperately lunging for the first paycheck available. That doesn’t sound like such a bad thing. But [...]

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The stimulus checks were like $2k or whatever, wasn't it? Why do they still bring that shit up? Holy shit. People really talk like that. Even that plus, what? $600/w in unemployment was it? 33k is just under median wage in 2019. That's depressing because that's not a comfortable amount of money. Honestly America should just stop having an economy based around giving the world <$16/hr for serving treats to boomers and gambling on which company serves them treats the best. That's all I can take away from this.

  • mr_world [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Feels like it tbh. I keep seeing more and more empty shelves. Gas station yesterday was completely out of regular.

  • Elon_Musk [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    But what if i suddenly need 500 bouncy balls and a pallet of fake vampire teeth? What will I do?

  • Caocao [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Next-day deliveries are becoming day-after-next deliveries.

    Oh, the humanity