Fungal sentences are slightly more complex than English, slightly less complex than Russian.

  • Asa_the_Red [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    me holding a gun to a mushroom: tell me the name of god you fungal piece of shit

    mushroom: can you feel your heart burning? can you feel the struggle within? the fear within me is beyond anything your soul can make. you cannot kill me in a way that matters

    me cocking the gun, tears streaming down my face: I’M NOT FUCKING SCARED OF YOU

  • crispy_lol [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    They don’t have brains. They have no level of intelligence. I read way too much of the study, seems very speculative

    • Commander_Data [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      It really depends on how you define "intelligence". If they have the ability to receive and process information from their environment and respond I'd call that "intelligence". All living things possess some degree of intelligence. Cephalopods lack a centralized "brain", having multiple distributed "lobes" throughout their bodies, but I doubt anyone would dispute that octopi are "intelligent."

      • leninstoupee [none/use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        The ability to receive and process information can even be done by non-living things, particularly since information here is environmental stimulus and processing is just responding to one stimulus differently from another. A crystal can do that as it grows.

        There's definitely a more familiar dynamic at play that we appreciate, where a living thing creates for itself complex and dynamic responses and spits out signals of its own, but single cells do this all the time. Viruses do as well. I personally wouldn't categorize a bacterium stochastically swimming towards a chemical gradient using a couple-step chemical process to be intelligence.

        • Thomas_Dankara [any,comrade/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          As we all know, the true mark of intelligence is being an articulate primate with a keyboard who spends their weekend deciding which other creatures are worthy of being called intelligent :kubrick-stare:

          • crispy_lol [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            It’s not really about “worthiness”. I’m skeptical of the idea because assholes weaponize this idea to justify eating clearly sentient, intelligent animals. Plants and fungi aren’t the same, they don’t have an equivalent to a central nervous system, and all these cynics are out here talking about well maybe they are sentient too based on these lukewarm studies, so I guess it doesn’t matter what we eat. No motherfucker, go vegan.

            • effervescent [they/them]
              ·
              3 years ago

              I believe that all these things are sentient and also factory farming is bad. How are those beliefs incompatible?

              • crispy_lol [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                I never said they were. I never even brought up factory farming, I think all meat eating is wrong. All I was talking about was how people will justify eating meat because they say plants/fungi are sentient too, and I hate that asinine bullshit.

                • effervescent [they/them]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  That doesn’t make any sense as am objection to veganism. Expanding the scope of harm means you’re allowed to do more harm???

                  • crispy_lol [he/him]
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    I see your point and I think you’re picking up on a cognitive dissonance that they tone out. To them it’s more like “well every edible thing is sentient, so I don’t need an ethical framework to decide what to eat” it’s wrong as you point out but also a convenient worldview for someone to justify eating meat.

                    • effervescent [they/them]
                      ·
                      3 years ago

                      Ah I see. So it’s kind of like what people do with “no ethical consumption under capitalism”? My understanding is that you can’t expect purity, but focusing on making it more ethical over time is something an individual should do. Western leftists seem to want it to mean, “don’t feel bad about your lifestyle being based on exploitation of the global south”, which is nonsense

                      • crispy_lol [he/him]
                        ·
                        3 years ago

                        Yeah exactly. And I’m not about purity either, I think there are times when eating meat is ethically valid, especially in our current food system, people with eating disorders or people in poverty with no better options for example. I’m a little skeptical of “making it more ethical over time”, I feel we need revolutionary change now, but I still do and promote going vegan on an individual level of course. I see a lot of parallels with veganism and Marxism, and that we clearly need to put a lot more effort into organizing politically and not just making individual reforms. And for both, it’s going to be tough sledding. I’m guilty of acting mostly individually myself, the capitalist system is really really good at disenfranchising activism. Sorry for the ramble, I’m mostly typing it out to as a commitment to myself to be better.

                        • effervescent [they/them]
                          ·
                          3 years ago

                          Nah that’s super spot on and I appreciate the clarification. I definitely meant the incrementalism from an individual perspective. Systemically, it’s revolution now. Organizing is…. A lot. I just found a community supported agriculture group who keeps everything vegan and I’m considering putting in some time, but I’ve also got other duties to attend to. Who knows?

      • eduardog3000 [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        If they have the ability to receive and process information from their environment

        It really depends on how you define "process". Plants arguably receive and process information. I wouldn't call that intelligence though.

        • kristina [she/her]
          ·
          3 years ago

          i mean at a certain point you gotta make an obvious comparison and define limits. if ants or lowly insects are bad to eat, is a fungus on the same level of intelligence as one?

          • eduardog3000 [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            If ants or lowly insects are bad to eat

            They aren't bad to eat, besides maybe not tasting great.

            • kristina [she/her]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              some feel more strongly about it

              ive eaten locusts before and quite enjoyed it

        • ass [he/him,comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          plants for sure do take in and process information, and perform some computations, but yeah i think the key thing is whether or not their way of processing information results in an experience of being alive, and i don't think it does. while i think the set of possible experiences is much more diverse than the subset that looks like our own and has familiar elements like "a sense of self" or "a sense of the present moment" i still find it unlikely that plants experience much of anything. i just don't think they have enough interconnectivity. maybe a mycorrhizal network joining a bunch of plants would get there.

          • eduardog3000 [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            i still find it unlikely that plants experience much of anything

            Yes, but insects might not either. It's a super fuzzy line that could be drawn just about anywhere.

      • crispy_lol [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s an important distinction and I’m very skeptical of anyone trying to put plants/fungi in the intelligent category because it’s a common move for anti-vegans to justify carnism.

    • kristina [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      youre a vegan yet you eat your own cheek cells every day, curious

    • BatCountryMusicFan [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Probably they do in some form, just based on biological structures different from our own. Like flowers will turn to follow the sun over the course of a day, and then there's that plant that can react to something touching it by curling in its leaves.

        • effervescent [they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          I have a friend who studied cognitive science and he says that while there is science to support various theories, the whole “consciousness” thing is very much stuck as metaphysics and philosophy right now. There’s no clear consensus as to what it is or why it happens.

          For my conjecture, I’ve always figured that memory is significantly more responsible for our perception of individual personhood than any actual continuity of a single consciousness is. That it’s an emergent property of certain recursive systems. The split brain experiments are pretty eye-opening in that regard

        • BatCountryMusicFan [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          The golden age of silk road psychedelics has come and gone. You'd order them safe and sound from a computer somewhere and a week later they'd come in the mail disguised as junk credit card ads... good times.

          • DialecticalShaman [none/use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Psilocybe spores are legal to buy/sell & possess in most U.S states. Cultivation is relatively simple. old.reddit.com/r/unclebens

      • AcidSmiley [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        i usually don't eat trees and weeds and mosses, so having melted into the soil network didn't stop me from eating plants. i probably shouldn't drop acid at a chickpea plantation, tho.

        • machiabelly [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          plantations are cash crops, tabacco, coffee, tea, cotton. Anything that is food is grown in a farm, field, or orchard. There might be other words but I can't think of them.

  • solaranus
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • frick [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Fungal sentences are slightly more complex than English, slightly less complex than Russian.

    i think the paper says the average "word" length is longer than english but shorter than russian...it seems like the lexicon has up to 30 words so no it's not more complex than english lol.

    • Asa_the_Red [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Juffo-Wup fills in my fibers and I grow turgid. Violent action ensues.

  • BigAssBlueBug [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    God I wish iw wasn't so ass at biology, I wouldve been a mycologist if I was good at it