Any site that is deemed to be "more than thirty-three and one-third percent of total material on a website" porn is required to ID Louisiana residents.

  • wopazoo [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Any site that is deemed to be “more than thirty-three and one-third percent of total material on a website” porn is required to ID Louisiana residents.

    Is Reddit more than 1/3 porn?

  • FlakesBongler [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Now see here, this here website is only 32% pornography

    Y'all can't make us take them there ID's now ya hear?

  • aaro [they/them, she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    pornhub will soon be uploading 2x their entire content library of unedited nature footage and 10x looped infomercials

    • MerryChristmas [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      That awkward moment when your mom walks in on you watching ant colony footage on pornhub...

    • ProfessorAdonisCnut [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh goodie a return to this kind of humour https://www.indiatimes.com/news/world/pornhub-airs-trump-s-inauguration-video-says-rich-white-man-fucks-the-entire-country-at-once-270514.html

  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sure this is silly and easily defeated by a vpn . But red states are headed for dark days as the GOP goes more and more fundie mode. It's only a matter of how bad things will get and how quickly it will happen. "Protecting the children" and "terrorism" are often excuses that can easily lead to draconian laws on mainstream stuff.

    One way the GOP justices on the supreme court could go fundie mode by using the right to privacy as a bludgeon. Here's a tweet thread about it. For brevity and clarity I edited it. If you want links - they are in the tweet thread.

    Roe v. Wade is based on the "right to privacy." If the majority opinion by SCOTUS suggests that the constitution does not protect the right to privacy... that affects a WHOLE lot of other decisions. Buckle up - this is the beginning of a lot of potential ugliness.

    • Lawrence v. Texas: Decided in 2003, the court used the Right to Privacy to determine that it's unconstitutional to punish people for committing sodomy. The Roe ruling could open the door for criminalizing homosexuality.

    • Griswold v. Connecticut: Decided in 1965, this case protects the ability of married couples to buy contraceptives without government restriction. This isn't just about abortion. Next up, contraceptives.

    • Loving v. Virginia: This 1968 case, which threw out laws banning interracial marriages, was decided based on the right to privacy. If a state wanted to prohibit who people could marry - there is no protection from that without a right to privacy.

    • Stanley v Georgia: This 1969 case found that there was a right to privacy around possession pornography. If a state wants to outlaw pornography or certain forms of adult pornography, it could do that without the right to privacy.

    • Obergefell v. Hodges: The 2015 opinion that legalized same sex marriage used the right to privacy and the equal protection clause to do so. This could open the door for a state to try to test same sex marriage laws.

    • Meyer v. Nebraska: This 1923 ruling allows families to decide for themselves if they want their children to learn a language other than English. This could open the door for racist states to try to outlaw learning their family's languages.

    • Skinner v Oklahoma: This 1942 ruling found that it's unconstitutional to forcibly sterilize people. The Roe ruling could open the door for criminals, disabled people or BIPOC folks to be forcibly sterilized.

    Okay. That's a quick overview of the judicial chaos that could occur in the aftermath of striking down Roe v Wade. All of these decisions might no longer be settled law and states could try to test them by creating laws designed to test the courts.

    Tweet

    • familiar [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Buckle up -

      One of my least favorite twitterisms

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I hate it too. r/politics used to really like it but eventually it faded because it was old and dated after the 50,001st usage about Trump.

      • BeamBrain [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Remember how the people who pushed back against that got ridiculed as fedora-tipping euphoric atheists?

        • SickleRick [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yeah, but, to be fair, a lot of them were/became fedora-tipping euphoric atheists. I straddled the line as an older teen. I still feel like the "everyone who was a New Atheist in the 00's is either a communist or a tradcath nazi now" holds true. Fortunately for me I put the Dawkins books down and eventually picked up Marx.

    • SaniFlush [any, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Could someone please disable the USA's nukes so the rest of the globe could shut them up already?

  • Sushi_Desires
    ·
    2 years ago

    Shielding Children’s Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net, or SCREEN Act

    This really stood out to me. The absolute peak of conservative "creativity" is creating a ridiculous acronym that can itself be read as a word.

  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    How are they measuring "total material?" Hours of video? file size? Length of time it takes to read?

    • SteamedHamberder [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Realistically what percentage of :reddit-logo: is porn? 25%? It could get close to that limit.

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
      ·
      2 years ago

      my question is who did they have go through all the 'material' to gather their data?

      • Wertheimer [any]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Thanks to Potter Stewart's "I know it when I see it" opinion, when obscenity cases go to trial, the defense lawyers usually submit a video store (or whatever)'s entire catalog as evidence so the judges theoretically have to watch all of it.

        https://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/movie-day-at-the-supreme-court-or-i-know-it-when-i-see-it-a.html

        • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
          ·
          2 years ago

          hehehehehe imagining some of those dusty old fucks that turned their brains into mush having to watch the depths of human lust has me giggling

          • Wertheimer [any]
            ·
            2 years ago

            The stuff about the obscenity cases in The Brethren is worth the price of admission. If I remember correctly Thurgood Marshall had a fun time of it mocking his more sheltered colleagues.

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
              ·
              2 years ago

              Thurgood Marshall

              damn his younger face screams lady-killer at me, i'm sure those dusty skellies he had to work with positively had their bones rattled from being exposed to stuff lewder than holding hands and seeing ankles under a long skirt

              • Wertheimer [any]
                ·
                2 years ago

                More hilarity with Supreme Court justices learning about sex for the first time.

                CW - parodic depictions of sex crimes

                Rehnquist slipped into the conference room one day and took his seat.

                He pulled a magazine from his stack of papers. The National Lampoon, a humor magazine, had just released its February issue. The centerfold was entitled “Amicae Curiae”—Friends of the Court—and it depicted, in a color cartoon, all nine of the Justices engaged in a variety of sexual activity.

                The Chief, naked except for holster and pistol, was on the floor licking the boot of an otherwise naked young woman.

                Brennan was standing in front of two very young girls holding his robe open.

                Stewart was measuring the throat of a young woman with a ruler, apparently in preparation for oral sex.

                Rehnquist, clad in a woman’s bra and red garter belt, was parading before the others cracking a black whip.

                White, a blindfold partially covering his glasses, was apparently engaged in some taxing sexual activity, though the cartoon did not make it clear what that activity was.

                Powell was kneeling naked, his hands bound together, while a black woman in underwear marked “Exhibit A” flogged him.

                Marshall stood by the side of the bench doing nothing but looking up at Douglas, who sat alone on the bench with a naked young boy at his side.

                Blackmun was sodomizing a kangaroo.

                Chuckling, Rehnquist passed the issue around the table. Most of them laughed. The Chief was angered both by the cartoon and the fact that it had been brought into conference.

                Afterward, Marshall sent a clerk to buy extra copies for his college-age children.

                Brennan proudly told his clerks that while every other Justice was portrayed engaging in some sexual activity, he was pictured protecting several young children by blocking their view with his robe.

                His clerks decided that they owed it to him to explain “flashing.”

                Blackmun told his clerks how funny the centerfold was, especially the portion depicting Rehnquist “in drag.” The only problem, Blackmun said, was that he couldn’t figure out what he was supposed to be doing with the kangaroo.

                The clerks drew straws to see who would tell him.

                • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Brennan proudly told his clerks that while every other Justice was portrayed...

                  STOP STOP YOU'RE GONNA KILL MEEEE!

              • Wertheimer [any]
                ·
                2 years ago

                I pirated an e-book and found the passages:

                spoiler

                At Trader Vic’s, Marshall had just launched into another story when he suddenly stopped. He stared at his watch a moment. It was about 1:50.

                “My God, I almost forgot,” he said in a stricken tone. “It’s movie day, we have to get back.”

                Movie day was the humorous highpoint of most terms. Year after year, several of the Justices and most of the clerks went either into a basement storeroom or to one of the larger conference rooms to watch feature films that were exhibits in obscenity cases that had been appealed to the Court.

                . . .

                But the others sat on folding chairs with their clerks, watching such films as I Am Curious (Yellow) projected onto a white wall. During his later years, Harlan watched the films from the first row, a few feet from the screen, able only to make out the general outlines. His clerk or another Justice would describe the action. “By Jove,” Harlan would exclaim. “Extraordinary.”

                Clerks frequently mocked Stewart’s approach to obscenity, calling out in the darkened room: “That’s it, that’s it, I know it when I see it.”

                Marshall’s quips were the best. The previous term, a pornographic movie had used the familiar ruse of posing as an educational film. The actor playing a psychologist had concluded by stating, “And so our nymphomaniac subject was never cured.” Marshall retorted, “Yeah, but I am.”

                Now the lights were about to go off as Marshall and White’s clerks plunged through the door to see Vixen, a “soft-core” feature with nudity but no explicit intercourse.

                The last thirteen minutes consisted of an attempted hijacking of the plane carrying the female protagonist by an Irish Communist bound for Cuba. He gave a talk on the comparative merits of Communist and Western societies. “Ah, the redeeming social value,” Marshall said.

                The clerks were disappointed that the movie was such soft-core.

                Powell left after the first film.

                The second movie was Sexual Freedom in Denmark, a feature documentary that had been released two years before. A very serious commentator explained the harmful effects of liberal Danish sexual attitudes, and showed a photograph of a penis in the last stages of syphilis. The dull narrative was punctuated by drawings of sexual and reproductive functions in color.

                Blackmun sat stone-faced, ignoring the banter from Marshall and the clerks. Marshall turned to him when the lights came on as the projectionist changed reels. “Well, Harry, I didn’t learn anything, how about you?”

                Blushing, Blackmun joined the rest of the room in a hearty laugh.

                The second reel had the first hard-breathing segment as two women made love. Then the film returned to its clinical, documentary style. Blackmun found it distasteful. The film’s tone, if not its content, degraded women. That alone was enough to predispose him against all pornography.

                Back in chambers, Powell’s clerks remarked to him that Vixen had been disappointing. Two clerks confessed that they had seen all the movies of the director Russ Meyer—the master of sexexploitation films. Yale Law School had even presented a Russ Meyer festival.

                Powell’s gaunt face was expressionless. He had never before seen such a film, he explained slowly. He had had no idea such movies were even made. He was shocked and disgusted. He did not wish to discuss it further.

                Powell’s clerks were amazed. There could not have been a milder movie for him to have seen. There had been nothing more than nudity, and facial and bodily expressions that suggested orgasm.

                • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  The actor playing a psychologist had concluded by stating, “And so our nymphomaniac subject was never cured.” Marshall retorted, “Yeah, but I am.”

                  mrw I read that line

                  Powell’s gaunt face was expressionless. He had never before seen such a film, he explained slowly. He had had no idea such movies were even made. He was shocked and disgusted. He did not wish to discuss it further.

                  Powell’s clerks were amazed. There could not have been a milder movie for him to have seen. There had been nothing more than nudity, and facial and bodily expressions that suggested orgasm.

                  Bro I'm dying :michael-laugh:

  • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    In evil china the government decies what you can look at on the internet and makes you use an ID

  • kristina [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    wait until they find out trans people are naked on those sites. hell gonna break loose

  • LeninWalksTheWorld [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Won't this mean internet porn is now just banned in Louisiana? Surely places without ID verification systems (very expensive) aren't going to implement them just to "satisfy" the Louisiana market. They'll probably just block you instead so they don't get sued and make you use a VPN

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      According to the article pornhub is getting a third party to do it. But other websites not big enough to afford such or that have not implemented such a system are operating as normal or blocking Louisiana IPs

    • StewartCopelandsDad [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Pornhub is implementing it. Until affordable ID verification plugin services pop up, small US studios will just geoblock Louisiana and lose some customers. Probably Pornhub, Mindgeek, etc. are happy with it for this reason. Not sure how much of their competition is within reach of Louisiana courts; shady sites outside of the US won't bother implementing restrictions.