kind of funny given what a stink everyone made about forgiving student loans being an upper middle class subsidy that the climate provisions are very explicitly a subsidy on upper middle class homeowners.

  • 4zi [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Biggest ever climate bill” ITS NOT A FUCKING CLIMATE BILL IF IT EXPANDS THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

    • anoncpc [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Like, they give 2 Million acres of land to oil companies for drill and call that climate bill, which Machin going to benefit. Like, this is just straight up lying, rebranding and scamming at this point. Just after they done scamming China about one China policy

    • BeamBrain [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It's technically a climate bill in that it's a bill that affects the climate

  • DirtbagVegan [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    No tax credit for buying an ebike, because your climate change “solution,” only counts if it can kill a child.

  • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
    ·
    2 years ago

    plant fucking trees! :monke-beepboop: PLANT FUCKING TREES PLANT FUCKING TREES

    reportedly there is some nebulous renewables and public transit money in there to be embezzled into cop budgets & grifts though, PROGRESS! :yes-honey-left:

    • silent_water [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      planting trees isn't enough - the act alone is carbon neutral in the long-run because the trees die and decompose, releasing the carbon back into the atmosphere. so you have to plant the trees then prevent their decomposition and do it at an accelerating rate to keep up with capitalism - would be a lot easier to leave the fossils in the ground and not burn them.

        • silent_water [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          yes, but that's kicking the can down the road and you still need to plant them at an ever-accelerating rate.

          • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
            ·
            2 years ago

            either get rid of capitalism or we all live in an endless mega forest, i like this plan.

            look i get theres limitations to planting trees its just the cheapest most immediately impactful thing to be done and its gobsmacking the west cant even organise a big campaign for it. capitalists really do be accelerationists

            • silent_water [she/her]
              ·
              2 years ago

              I'm saying that any plan that doesn't involve getting rid of capitalism still kills us. it's not enough to replant the trees, we need to restore the forests, with all their biodiversity. otherwise, these artificial carbon stores only work until they die and release the carbon back into the atmosphere. in order to be true carbon sinks -- the kind that created the coal we're burning in the first place -- the forest was well and truly trap the carbon that's emitted by the decomposition process. we know this happens in real forests and does not happen in artificial ones, because we only plant the trees.

              • invalidusernamelol [he/him]M
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Coal comes from trees that didn't decompose because the micro-organisms that decompose them now didn't exist. There's no going back.

      • john_browns_beard [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        To clarify, we would need to replant massive amounts of trees and then maintain that amount of trees indefinitely to keep the carbon captured. There's only so many trees you can plant.

        Eventually some carbon from dead trees would be fixed as coal I suppose, but now you are talking thousands or millions of years.

        • jkfjfhkdfgdfb [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Eventually some carbon from dead trees would be fixed as coal I suppose

          can that even happen on any significant scale now that stuff's better at breaking down wood

            • invalidusernamelol [he/him]M
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              We'd need to dump them into the ocean or something where they'd petrify. That would cause all sorts of untold knock on effects on the deep sea ecosystem though.

              We also have that little issue with algae blooms disappearing and the main oxygen engines of the planet failing.

          • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
            ·
            2 years ago

            You can pyrolyse the wood into charcoal, which is porous and mostly biochemically stable, so if you put that in the soil it will increase (ionic) nutrient adsorption and water retention, assist lots of organisms, and remain in the soil as elemental carbon for centuries if not millennia.

            Charcoal burns at a hotter temperature than wood. So, you can have a Combined Heat and Power stove/engine, or a combined heat/char, or a combined power/char. As long as you're planting more trees than you use for fuel, and putting some char into the soil, you're doing a net sequestration of carbon. It's not fast or flashy, but it does work very reliably.

        • silent_water [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          yeah + in well-established forests, the CO2 that's emitted ends up captured again by the plants growing in it. when the capitalists plant forests, they only plant the trees so it takes a while before the rest of the biodiversity is restored to the artificial forests and the same effect takes hold. we don't need to plant trees; we need to replant the forests. and that means restoring the plant AND animal life that used to live in them. unbalanced and artificial ecosystems just create new problems if they cannot sustain themselves.

    • Cowboyitis69 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wouldn’t we need to plant like 50 bazillion trees in the span of a decade to offset the co2?

  • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    they really need to change the way they subsidize energy conservation in homes, because a whole fuckload of people do not own their own homes and landlords do not give a fuck about their renters' heating bills.

    the obvious solution is maoist insurrection against landlords, but short of that that system should punish landlords who do not make these upgrades as reported by tenants. forced rent reductions, eviction protections, make it hurt. make them squeal. roast and eat them in the ashes of their banks.

  • anoncpc [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Seem like he forgot to mention all the shite on the bill to get Sinema and Manchin on board. But it is what it is, a bill that has been gutted down so much, that somehow it ended up worse, like money laundering scam

  • Presents [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ooo, good! Now the IRS can go after working and middle class taxpayers for mistakes of hundreds of dollars, and fine them thousands! That's going to be great! Such a great profit to be made there.

    You didn't think they were going to use the money to go after big corporations, did you? LOL

  • LeninsRage [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Def gonna reduce emissions on a large scale through tax credits on consumer goods

  • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
    hexagon
    ·
    2 years ago

    Also I didn't have much of a dog in the gas vs electric stove wars, until I found out that electric stoves don't work great with moka pots. You'll take my moka pot coffee from my cold dead hands (cause of death will probably be a heart attack because that shit is about as strong as espresso and comes in drip coffee quantities, how am I still alive).

    • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      How would it "not work great" you're just heating a metal vessel to make steam inside Im pretty sure electricity can do that

      • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Depending on the type of electric stove the sensor might not recognize the pot because it's too small.

        Had an infrared electric flat stove that didn't turn on if it didn't detect a pan on it. I think induction stoves can also be picky about pan detection.

        Being able to turn off safety features would fix this

        • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Had an infrared electric flat stove that didn’t turn on if it didn’t detect a pan on it. I think induction stoves can also be picky about pan detection.

          that's e z tho just put a pan on it, and put the moka pot on the pan 😎

      • Presents [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Gas = instant blowtorch heat

        Electric = takes a while. may refuse to turn on. doesn't do high heat, which is essential for stir frying.

    • SadStruggle92 [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      You’ll take my moka pot coffee from my cold dead hands

      U guys are all genuinely weird. Just use a fkn' $25 mr. coffee drip machine like I do.

      • forgotmylastpword [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        it makes too much coffee for me and my partner. Moka Pots produce just the right amount so there's none of that nasty hyperacidic 2-day-old coffee that I have to chug before it gets moldy. Plus Moka pots last forever and are only $25 more than the drip machine. Also the coffee just tastes better.

    • duderium [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been using a bialetti with an electric stovetop multiple times per day for years without a problem.

    • Fartbutt420 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Factually incorrect, I have an electric stove and the Moka pot gets plenty of use. Induction stoves won't work, though.

      • emizeko [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        after a spare heart that'd probably be the most useful backup organ

          • emizeko [they/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            unfortunately I think that would end up being more like a Chang and Eng Bunker type situation

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Fun fact: If the power goes out your electric range doesn't work.

      Which is why I now have a propane camp stove.

    • celestial
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • CanYouFeelItMrKrabs [any, he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I expected a minimum corporate tax to be discussed more on Twitter but I didn to see much mention of it. It's a min tax based on the income reported to shareholders so it excludes deductibles and credits and that kind of thing

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      31-44% reduction seems higher than I would've expected, but I guess the baseline reduction is higher than I expected.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I'll believe it when I see it. We've done nothing but accelerate in the 21st century so far.

        • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, in case it isn't clear I'm really skeptical of the baseline reduction. And assuming that the methodology is similar between baseline and the added reduction from the subsidies in this bill, then those numbers are questionable too.

  • tagen
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator