• SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
        ·
        6 days ago

        Using "I was going to vote for Joe Biden after the immunity ruling, but he refuses to blow up the SC Justices before they overturn gay marriage so I won't" as a reason now lmao

        • Dessa [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          They literally have no excuses anymore. Everything that democratic voters insist that their guy wanted to do but couldn't is 100% doable now. With the power of legal assasination given to the presidency, all that shit would now be possible. That dems won't do it is proof of their lack of interest or conviction in their stated goals

          • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
            ·
            6 days ago

            They're too busy hand-wringing that democracy has ended fucking lmao

            If their guy did that, I think a lot of them would actually abstain from voting

      • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        6 days ago

        I encourage Joe Biden to gather all the right wing state governors and every single Republican he can for a grand July 4th celebration with an announcement. Tell them he wants to discuss something with immigration and funding from the federal government... that'll probably get them to show up. Just a big ol' freedom BBQ in and around the Capitol building.

        And then he can do the funniest thing in history

    • Dessa [she/her]
      ·
      6 days ago

      The fact that SCOTUS did this knowing the democrats won't actually take advantage of this golden opportunuty to consolidate power really says it all

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh no that would be bad and wrong, he'd have to put Trump on an international terrorism list first, THEN he could do what Obama did and murder Trump and his children with a drone strike

      • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        6 days ago

        Imagine Matt Miller and Kirby telling the press gaggle that there would be an internal investigation into the alleged drone striking of an ex-president

        "It's tough cookies, folks. Look. Donald Trump wasn't a good guy. And hey, I get it, and we're investigating. But you know what? I don't hear any of you talking about what he did on Jan 6. Did you forget? I didn't and President Biden didn't either. It's a tragic thing that his entire extended family is dead. I agree! But let's not forget who he was and what he did. It's real tough, folks. So let the pentagon look into it, and we'll let you know. Alright anymore questions? No more about Trump."

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Look, at this time it's impossible for you to know- for anyone to know, what happened at Mar a Lago. Okay? Now, (speaking over the reporter) NOW, the Republicans are saying one thing, and the Pentagon hasn't completed their investigation. We're going to wait for the results of that investigation, but what I will say is there's reason to believe that Mar a Lago was being used to store military hardware.

      • Sickos [they/them, it/its]
        ·
        6 days ago

        Misfired hamas missile that came back down and hit mar a Lago. Because it was actually fired from Mar a Lago. Secret hamas base all along.

        • barrbaric [he/him]
          ·
          6 days ago

          Actually it was an Orange Dome missile run by the Florida State Guard, time to invade Florida for blowing up a president.

    • SwitchyWitchyandBitchy [she/her]
      ·
      6 days ago

      I'm far from knowledgeable on constitutional law, but skimming the linked ruling, it's very vague and seems to basically say that the supreme Court gets to decide if something is constitutional or not. So a united executive branch and judicial branch can do whatever they want with impunity.

      They say the president has absolute immunity from criminal persecution "for actions within his conclusive and preclu- sive constitutional authority." And he also has presumptive immunity for "all his official acts." And ofc I'm sure it's up to the supreme to decide what qualifies an an official act, whether the presumptive immunity should be upheld, and whether an action is within the presidents "conclusive and precious I've constitutional authority".

      • Diuretic_Materialism [he/him]
        ·
        6 days ago

        Okay so just kill all the Republican court justices first, appoint new ones and have them rule the act an official one, then drone strike Mar-a-Lago. Simple.

        • SwitchyWitchyandBitchy [she/her]
          ·
          6 days ago

          Let's be real. He'll refuse to do anything meaningful with his power, hand over the dictatorship to Trump after losing, and then blame leftists and the youth while Trump removes everybody left of Romney from power.

  • citrussy_capybara [ze/hir]
    ·
    6 days ago

    giving the biden regime the green light to merc trump legally, but they’d rather give him a second term

  • motherofmonsters [she/her]
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s very hard for me to square that idea that trump is an existential threat who must be stopped by any means necessary, and the notion that Biden is allowed to do anything legally.

    • Ishmael [he/him]
      ·
      6 days ago

      Obama murdered a 16-year-old who wasn't even accused of a crime and got away with it, but I guess the rules are different when the victim is Muslim

    • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
      ·
      6 days ago

      I tried to explain this to libs back in 2018ish. If Trump is a fascist, why would voting him out do anything? Ya'll are either being hyperbolic, or you're being cowards.

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Trump is a fascist, but that is because everyone in the U.S. government follows the logic of fascism, because neoliberalism is just fascism without the campy outfits. He just not a systemic-ending fascist.

        • motherofmonsters [she/her]
          ·
          6 days ago

          The issue is he’s an anti institutionalist corporate oligarch, which in a vacuum is neutral and par for the course, but in this case, one of the few things keeping America from completely coming apart at the seams are the institutions who want to make sure arsenic isn’t in kids’ toothpaste and shit.

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
            ·
            6 days ago

            So is your bog-standard Republican. All of Trump's initial appointees were bog-standard Republican, and the only got wiggy by the end after everything had been gutted(something btw that Biden hasn't actually done anything to fix in the interim).

            The only thing that Trump is bad at is the kayfabe of DC politics.

            • motherofmonsters [she/her]
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s what P25 aims to fix.

              Also there was a ton of brain drain. Competent people don’t want to come back knowing that they might just get fired / made miserable under the next R President, so it’s hard to even fix these institutional problems in 4 years

              • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
                ·
                6 days ago

                Then it's never going to happen! If the Democrats aren't ready by now, they will never be ready. There is absolutely no way in this system to guarantee that power doesn't change hands between the parties. Especially after Bush v. Gore, and the latest Supreme Court mandates. The train only goes one way.

            • motherofmonsters [she/her]
              ·
              6 days ago

              They will dismantle the administrative state and replace it with a fully kleptocratic one, instead of the hybrid one we have on life support

    • jackmarxist [any]
      ·
      6 days ago

      If Biden gets Trump assassinated by the CIA will it be considered official business?

      • silent_water [she/her]
        ·
        6 days ago

        yeah, the decision says exercises of constitutional authority have immunity. they're /presumed/ to be official acts. so if assassinations are covered by the president, he's free to kill off his political enemies.

        • radiofreeval [any]
          ·
          6 days ago

          As commander in chief, ordering military objectives is a constitutionally declared duty of the president so it seems very clear to me as that's a conclusive constitutional duty. This line seems relevant: "[...] President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclu- sive constitutional authority"

        • HexBroke [any, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          There was some reporting a while back about how the CIA wanted to assassinate Julian Assange and the Trump administration had to talk them down

    • plinky [he/him]
      ·
      6 days ago

      the obvious rules based liberal solution to trump is fucking divest presidential powers, instead of giving even more expansive executive meow-tableflip

  • ksynwa_from_lemmygrad [he/him, des/pair]
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is why you all need to vote. If we had blue judges in the Supreme Court this would have never happened. As long as you vote we will have democracy back in about 300 years.

  • Beaver [he/him]
    ·
    6 days ago

    I know they won't do it, but if Dems had any guts they would just explicitly challenge Marbury v. Madison, and just start ignoring Supreme Court decisions. You know the right wingers would do exactly that if they were in a similar predicament with a 6-3 liberal majority court.

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
      ·
      6 days ago

      the SC completely invented their power from whole cloth and (almost) every subsequent administration has just gone with it

      Democracy

      • Bnova [he/him]
        ·
        6 days ago

        People think that I'm crazy when I say the supreme Court is basically a toddler that adults are pretending has magical powers to not make them cry. It's maddening, ignore the toddler!

    • Yeat [he/him]
      ·
      6 days ago

      sorry i hated learning government in school, i know the president could pack the court but you’re telling me they aren’t even obligated to honor their decisions and ignore them?

      • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The supreme court has no explicit constitutional mechanism or authority to enforce their decisions, so they literally made one up, the idea that when they declare a law unconstitutional it just suddenly stops being a law.

        Everyone just goes along with it because the whole country was designed from the ground up to prevent good things and only elect people who want to prevent good things. But there's literally no reason the rest of the government couldn't just go "thanks for your opinion but we don't gaf"

  • SovietyWoomy [any]
    ·
    6 days ago

    I feel morally obligated to vote for whichever third party candidate says they'll take advantage of presidential immunity and drone strike wall street.

  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
    ·
    6 days ago

    My liberal coworkers are coping by "well that's fine because unofficial acts can still be prosecuted"

    • FortifiedAttack [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yeah I've seen the same take.

      Are they really stupid enough to think that Trump (and future Republicans) wouldn't just label everything an official act as a direct consequence?

      Edit: I mean he could quite literally go on 5th Avenue now if reelected, declare "I, PRESIDENT TRUMP, AM OFFICIALLY BLOWING IT OUT YOUR ASS" and gun someone down.

    • silent_water [she/her]
      ·
      6 days ago

      good thing the decision doesn't cover that base by saying exercises of constitutional authority are official acts lmao

      • Black_Mald_Futures [any]
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sorry sweaty whether or not an act is official is a political decision and not subject to review by the courts

    • Mokey [none/use name]
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yea true the most progressive president ever hashtag should probably line up and shoot every conservative politician

    • NewAcctWhoDis [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      And drop an action movie line about "executive branch"

      • plinky [he/him]
        ·
        6 days ago

        putting execution back into the execution of powers

  • FortifiedAttack [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Joker pill is officially outdated, it's time for the Mad Max pill.

    What are your wastelander nicknames gonna be?

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    6 days ago

    I would like to remind everyone that per the scotus the extrajudicial murder of us citizens accused of terrorism is a "political question" not subject to review by the courts.

  • Goadstool [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    6 days ago

    By far the most depressing part of this is that Biden and the democrats will do jack shit with it

    If literally anything happens I will be both astounded and genuinely impressed

    • Verito@lemm.ee
      ·
      6 days ago

      They wouldn't want to, because it doesn't matter to them. It makes their bogeyman Trump even scarier, and keeps that desperate cash flowing to their campaign coffers so both parties can play off one another while robbing the country, and the global South, blind.

      • Goadstool [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah; I'm not exactly expecting that they would do anything actually good even if they did something... I suppose a small part of me is hoping that Biden being totally out of it might mean he'd do something genuinely batshit.

  • HarryLime [any]
    ·
    6 days ago

    Literally why should the President pay attention to anything the Supreme Court says, then?

    Like, why not just say that everything regulatory agencies do also constitutes an official act by the President, so WHOOPS! There goes your dismantling of Chevron, John Roberts. Regulations aren't reviewable by any court now. Fuck you.

    • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      6 days ago

      Reminds me of that moment in the October Revolution where the people were begging the bolshevik's to take power. The American people want someone to do and act on their behalf and this is what we are saddled with.

  • silent_water [she/her]
    ·
    6 days ago

    this is actually even more sweeping. the decision gives immunity to all exercises of constitutional authority, not just official acts.

    elmofire

    • Black_Mald_Futures [any]
      ·
      6 days ago

      exercises of constitutional authority

      I don't know what this liberal buzzword means though

  • ChaosMaterialist [he/him]
    ·
    6 days ago

    I can practically hear the panic of every AP US Government teacher dreading the "Separation of Powers" section and the inevitability of one kid asking a question about this court case.