• SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
        ·
        5 months ago

        Using "I was going to vote for Joe Biden after the immunity ruling, but he refuses to blow up the SC Justices before they overturn gay marriage so I won't" as a reason now lmao

        • Dessa [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          They literally have no excuses anymore. Everything that democratic voters insist that their guy wanted to do but couldn't is 100% doable now. With the power of legal assasination given to the presidency, all that shit would now be possible. That dems won't do it is proof of their lack of interest or conviction in their stated goals

          • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
            ·
            5 months ago

            They're too busy hand-wringing that democracy has ended fucking lmao

            If their guy did that, I think a lot of them would actually abstain from voting

      • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        5 months ago

        I encourage Joe Biden to gather all the right wing state governors and every single Republican he can for a grand July 4th celebration with an announcement. Tell them he wants to discuss something with immigration and funding from the federal government... that'll probably get them to show up. Just a big ol' freedom BBQ in and around the Capitol building.

        And then he can do the funniest thing in history

    • Dessa [she/her]
      ·
      5 months ago

      The fact that SCOTUS did this knowing the democrats won't actually take advantage of this golden opportunuty to consolidate power really says it all

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh no that would be bad and wrong, he'd have to put Trump on an international terrorism list first, THEN he could do what Obama did and murder Trump and his children with a drone strike

      • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        5 months ago

        Imagine Matt Miller and Kirby telling the press gaggle that there would be an internal investigation into the alleged drone striking of an ex-president

        "It's tough cookies, folks. Look. Donald Trump wasn't a good guy. And hey, I get it, and we're investigating. But you know what? I don't hear any of you talking about what he did on Jan 6. Did you forget? I didn't and President Biden didn't either. It's a tragic thing that his entire extended family is dead. I agree! But let's not forget who he was and what he did. It's real tough, folks. So let the pentagon look into it, and we'll let you know. Alright anymore questions? No more about Trump."

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Look, at this time it's impossible for you to know- for anyone to know, what happened at Mar a Lago. Okay? Now, (speaking over the reporter) NOW, the Republicans are saying one thing, and the Pentagon hasn't completed their investigation. We're going to wait for the results of that investigation, but what I will say is there's reason to believe that Mar a Lago was being used to store military hardware.

      • Sickos [they/them, it/its]
        ·
        5 months ago

        Misfired hamas missile that came back down and hit mar a Lago. Because it was actually fired from Mar a Lago. Secret hamas base all along.

        • barrbaric [he/him]
          ·
          5 months ago

          Actually it was an Orange Dome missile run by the Florida State Guard, time to invade Florida for blowing up a president.

    • SwitchyWitchyandBitchy [she/her]
      ·
      5 months ago

      I'm far from knowledgeable on constitutional law, but skimming the linked ruling, it's very vague and seems to basically say that the supreme Court gets to decide if something is constitutional or not. So a united executive branch and judicial branch can do whatever they want with impunity.

      They say the president has absolute immunity from criminal persecution "for actions within his conclusive and preclu- sive constitutional authority." And he also has presumptive immunity for "all his official acts." And ofc I'm sure it's up to the supreme to decide what qualifies an an official act, whether the presumptive immunity should be upheld, and whether an action is within the presidents "conclusive and precious I've constitutional authority".

      • Diuretic_Materialism [he/him]
        ·
        5 months ago

        Okay so just kill all the Republican court justices first, appoint new ones and have them rule the act an official one, then drone strike Mar-a-Lago. Simple.

        • SwitchyWitchyandBitchy [she/her]
          ·
          5 months ago

          Let's be real. He'll refuse to do anything meaningful with his power, hand over the dictatorship to Trump after losing, and then blame leftists and the youth while Trump removes everybody left of Romney from power.

  • citrussy_capybara [ze/hir]
    ·
    5 months ago

    giving the biden regime the green light to merc trump legally, but they’d rather give him a second term

  • motherofmonsters [she/her]
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s very hard for me to square that idea that trump is an existential threat who must be stopped by any means necessary, and the notion that Biden is allowed to do anything legally.

    • Ishmael [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      Obama murdered a 16-year-old who wasn't even accused of a crime and got away with it, but I guess the rules are different when the victim is Muslim

    • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      I tried to explain this to libs back in 2018ish. If Trump is a fascist, why would voting him out do anything? Ya'll are either being hyperbolic, or you're being cowards.

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Trump is a fascist, but that is because everyone in the U.S. government follows the logic of fascism, because neoliberalism is just fascism without the campy outfits. He just not a systemic-ending fascist.

        • motherofmonsters [she/her]
          ·
          5 months ago

          The issue is he’s an anti institutionalist corporate oligarch, which in a vacuum is neutral and par for the course, but in this case, one of the few things keeping America from completely coming apart at the seams are the institutions who want to make sure arsenic isn’t in kids’ toothpaste and shit.

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
            ·
            5 months ago

            So is your bog-standard Republican. All of Trump's initial appointees were bog-standard Republican, and the only got wiggy by the end after everything had been gutted(something btw that Biden hasn't actually done anything to fix in the interim).

            The only thing that Trump is bad at is the kayfabe of DC politics.

            • motherofmonsters [she/her]
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s what P25 aims to fix.

              Also there was a ton of brain drain. Competent people don’t want to come back knowing that they might just get fired / made miserable under the next R President, so it’s hard to even fix these institutional problems in 4 years

              • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
                ·
                5 months ago

                Then it's never going to happen! If the Democrats aren't ready by now, they will never be ready. There is absolutely no way in this system to guarantee that power doesn't change hands between the parties. Especially after Bush v. Gore, and the latest Supreme Court mandates. The train only goes one way.

            • motherofmonsters [she/her]
              ·
              5 months ago

              They will dismantle the administrative state and replace it with a fully kleptocratic one, instead of the hybrid one we have on life support

    • jackmarxist [any]
      ·
      5 months ago

      If Biden gets Trump assassinated by the CIA will it be considered official business?

      • silent_water [she/her]
        ·
        5 months ago

        yeah, the decision says exercises of constitutional authority have immunity. they're /presumed/ to be official acts. so if assassinations are covered by the president, he's free to kill off his political enemies.

        • HexBroke
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

    • plinky [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      the obvious rules based liberal solution to trump is fucking divest presidential powers, instead of giving even more expansive executive meow-tableflip

  • ksynwa_from_lemmygrad [he/him, des/pair]
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is why you all need to vote. If we had blue judges in the Supreme Court this would have never happened. As long as you vote we will have democracy back in about 300 years.

  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
    ·
    5 months ago

    My liberal coworkers are coping by "well that's fine because unofficial acts can still be prosecuted"

    • FortifiedAttack [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah I've seen the same take.

      Are they really stupid enough to think that Trump (and future Republicans) wouldn't just label everything an official act as a direct consequence?

      Edit: I mean he could quite literally go on 5th Avenue now if reelected, declare "I, PRESIDENT TRUMP, AM OFFICIALLY BLOWING IT OUT YOUR ASS" and gun someone down.

    • silent_water [she/her]
      ·
      5 months ago

      good thing the decision doesn't cover that base by saying exercises of constitutional authority are official acts lmao

      • Black_Mald_Futures [any]
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sorry sweaty whether or not an act is official is a political decision and not subject to review by the courts

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would like to remind everyone that per the scotus the extrajudicial murder of us citizens accused of terrorism is a "political question" not subject to review by the courts.

  • Beaver [he/him]
    ·
    5 months ago

    I know they won't do it, but if Dems had any guts they would just explicitly challenge Marbury v. Madison, and just start ignoring Supreme Court decisions. You know the right wingers would do exactly that if they were in a similar predicament with a 6-3 liberal majority court.

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      the SC completely invented their power from whole cloth and (almost) every subsequent administration has just gone with it

      Democracy

      • Bnova [he/him]
        ·
        5 months ago

        People think that I'm crazy when I say the supreme Court is basically a toddler that adults are pretending has magical powers to not make them cry. It's maddening, ignore the toddler!

    • Yeat [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      sorry i hated learning government in school, i know the president could pack the court but you’re telling me they aren’t even obligated to honor their decisions and ignore them?

      • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The supreme court has no explicit constitutional mechanism or authority to enforce their decisions, so they literally made one up, the idea that when they declare a law unconstitutional it just suddenly stops being a law.

        Everyone just goes along with it because the whole country was designed from the ground up to prevent good things and only elect people who want to prevent good things. But there's literally no reason the rest of the government couldn't just go "thanks for your opinion but we don't gaf"

  • FortifiedAttack [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Joker pill is officially outdated, it's time for the Mad Max pill.

    What are your wastelander nicknames gonna be?

    • Mokey [none/use name]
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yea true the most progressive president ever hashtag should probably line up and shoot every conservative politician

    • NewAcctWhoDis [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      And drop an action movie line about "executive branch"

      • plinky [he/him]
        ·
        5 months ago

        putting execution back into the execution of powers

  • SovietyWoomy [any]
    ·
    5 months ago

    I feel morally obligated to vote for whichever third party candidate says they'll take advantage of presidential immunity and drone strike wall street.

  • supafuzz [comrade/them]
    ·
    5 months ago

    Remember when "if the president does it, it's not illegal" was shocking?

  • silent_water [she/her]
    ·
    5 months ago

    this is actually even more sweeping. the decision gives immunity to all exercises of constitutional authority, not just official acts.

    elmofire

    • Black_Mald_Futures [any]
      ·
      5 months ago

      exercises of constitutional authority

      I don't know what this liberal buzzword means though

  • HarryLime [any]
    ·
    5 months ago

    Literally why should the President pay attention to anything the Supreme Court says, then?

    Like, why not just say that everything regulatory agencies do also constitutes an official act by the President, so WHOOPS! There goes your dismantling of Chevron, John Roberts. Regulations aren't reviewable by any court now. Fuck you.

    • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      5 months ago

      Reminds me of that moment in the October Revolution where the people were begging the bolshevik's to take power. The American people want someone to do and act on their behalf and this is what we are saddled with.

  • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    5 months ago

    Rip the mask off, we are in a fascist state; The elites want fascism. Let's go baby arm up, run guns, sabotage. Die for the revolution, or live in tyranny in a dying and warming world. THERE'S NOTHING TO LOSE.

      • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        preaching to the choir i know. My brother is a conspiracy theorist, and I struggle to have the confidence that these lunatics have, the certainty with which they scream and yell about deep states and cabals. So I try to be nuanced. But you try to be nuanced, you try to remain cool headed, and reality is like blaring klaxon horns at you, that the world is on fire. It's so depressing.

        • hello_hello [comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          brother is a conspiracy theorist, and I struggle to have the confidence that these lunatics

          It's more of a lack of confidence, it's a fear response that leads to self-victimization and boatloads of nihilism and depression. This is also a feature of the USian system. They're not lunatics, they're incredibly, incredibly scared but have no theory nor understanding of history to help them.