Thank you, federation, for bringing libs to our lair once again.

They really always default to the same fucking shit "BOT! XINNIE THE POOH!" like an actual NPC che-laugh

  • Othello
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • HighOnCopium [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    god they just radiate redditor energy

    what posting on reddit does to a mf

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I refuse to go there but are they doing the reddit shit where everyone tells the same jokes in every thread?

      • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        doing the reddit shit

        can confirm this happens every. damn. thread.

        yeah this honestly. this comment hit me right in the feels. shut up and take my upvote!

        this is gonna get buried and I'm probably gonna get downvoted for this but fuck Russia and fuck Putler.

        edit: wow, this thread really blew up! RIP my inbox!

        edit2: thanks for the gold kind stranger!

        edit3: I'm seeing word that there's some tankies hanging around on this thread, and I'm only going to say this once - get the fuck out. Maybe you went, I don't know, to a LIBRARY for once in your lives and read a book on the Soviet Union that you so fervently worship, let alone the authoritarian Chinese government, you wouldn't be such fucking douchecanoes.

        edit4: holy shit somebody gave me platinum! you are epic, good sir!

        edit5: who would have thought my most upvoted comment would have been on this thread!

        edit6: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) swiggity swooty

        edit7: alright, I'm noping the fuck out of here! see you later everybody!

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Real 2008 "How is depicting Obama as Curious George offensive? Everybody loves Curious George." Energy.

    • AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was the brilliance of this too. The initial comparison was a chinese man to a yellow bear and a black man to a tiger called "Tigger", the levels of racism we've come to expect from the rabid HK separatists.

  • Infamousblt [any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Say what you will about federation it's been great for the dunk tank

  • footfaults
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    deleted by creator

  • FlakesBongler [they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do you mean it's racist to call a Chinese man yellow? It's just like everyone's favorite Asian Peril character, the perfidious Yellow Claw!

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember Fu Manchu, the giant racist egg that Marvel just never quite got rid of?

      • FlakesBongler [they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Marvel eventually had to stop using Fu Manchu because of copyright, so they eventually just came up with The Yellow Claw

        Shang Chi's original father before they started to use The Mandarin instead

        (Which is it's own bucket of worms, but yeah, lots of Yellow Peril in comic books)

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    deleted by creator

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        deleted by creator

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • combat_brandonism [they/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              it's distilled through the lens of modern anglo bullshit so it's not great on gender but a lot of wheel of time draws from norse mythology, including the gender-bendy parts. calling it gender essentialist is a pretty shallow read

              • UlyssesT
                ·
                edit-2
                18 days ago

                deleted by creator

                • Mardoniush [she/her]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Compare Discworld, which has strongly gendered magic but is made very clear that it's a cultural construct and anyone can learn either mode (or both, though generally not at once) if they have the right mindset and inclination.

                  • UlyssesT
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    18 days ago

                    deleted by creator

                • silent_water [she/her]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  there's an explicitly trans male character that channels the appropriate magic. he's considered the weird woman who channels male magic until it's dropped that satan literally cursed him to live as a woman. it's a very binary gender system but if you're going to have eternal souls, it's not an awful way to handle trans characters. there's a lot wrong with the gender politics and Jordan sucks ass at writing women so there's much riper targets to criticize the series over than this.

                  • UlyssesT
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    18 days ago

                    deleted by creator

                    • silent_water [she/her]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      definitely. the first 6 books are ok if you turn your brain off and don't think too hard about them but the later books really drag on and on and on and on. I had infinite patience as a kid and I miss that sometimes. the fandom is absolutely cursed.

                      • UlyssesT
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        18 days ago

                        deleted by creator

                • combat_brandonism [they/them]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Love to have a cis man come at me about what is and isn't gender essentialism because he perceives me as being a treat defender and therefore the target of his life's vendetta.

                  Calling it a shallow read doesn't imply anything of the sort. As others pointed out in more detail than me, there are better places to critique the books and how they handle gender. Which is the point of what I wrote.

                  I fucking knew when I wrote that reply I'd get an arrogant, condescending reply like this. I don't like the vibe you've brought to hexbear since you've been here, and I will not reply further.

                  • UlyssesT
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    18 days ago

                    deleted by creator

                    • combat_brandonism [they/them]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Ok one more reply since this is an excellent example and to not reply would be at least one type of liberalism. I took your comparison of my words to lobster man as an attack on myself, which it was. My original reply was not hostile and intended to correct your critique so that you can better target future ridicule of these books. But because you have this weird persecution complex you interpret any disagreement as treat defending, and collapse further, more hostile replies into that. When you're usually the one that escalates hostility in the first place!

                      I absolutely think these books are worthy of ridicule because they're full of unexamined cringe patriarchy from start-to-finish.

                      I saw you do this exact same thing in a thread just yesterday or the day before. It's incredibly off-putting.

                      It's a shame because I've learned a lot from your posts (i.e. about how gross the gambo writer is, etc.) and they often prompt me to write replies to you before I delete them because I know that if my reply isn't a 100% circlejerk of your point, you're going to jump down my throat and immediately escalate into hostility over it. That's what I can't stand about your participation here.

                      I will be disengaging now and would appreciate you doing the same.

                      • UlyssesT
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        18 days ago

                        deleted by creator

                      • UlyssesT
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        18 days ago

                        deleted by creator

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • CTHlurker [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hasn't that game been in development since 2010? So the dumpy 45-year old was at one point a slightly less dumpy 30-something who presumably had some disposable income to throw at a cool kickstarter game.

  • VILenin [he/him]M
    ·
    1 year ago

    Liberals can’t help but repeat 200 year old debunked talking points like a broken record player, as if it will make sense this time

    • Gosplan14_the_Third [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      As is well known, Lassalle heard nothing of the "iron law of wages" other than the word "iron" borrowed from Goethe's "eternal, iron, great laws". The word brazen is a signature by which the true believers recognize themselves. But if I take the law with Lassalle's stamp and therefore in his sense, then I must also take it with his justification. And what is she? As Lange showed shortly after Lassalle's death: the Malthusian theory of population (preached by Lange himself). But if this is correct, then again I cannot abolish the law, even if I abolish wage labor a hundred times, because the law then governs not only the system of wage labor but every social system. Precisely based on this, the economists have been proving for fifty years and more that socialism cannot abolish natural misery, but only generalize it and spread it over the entire surface of society at the same time!

      • K. Marx, 1875 (Critique of the Gotha Program - Google translated from German/mlwerke.de, I CBA to look up the quote in English)

      They're using the same arguments as 150 years ago, yes.

      • IceWallowCum [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It's incredible how Marx was already dunking on the same arguments we see TODAY, everywhere.

        Somewhere in Grundrisse, he criticizes an American economist that argues that the state is wheighing down the american economy and that it should be abolished for the market to be free. The quotes felt like someone slipped reddit comments into the pages.

        (Btw, Marx explains that the American state is itself the result of the self organization of free market forces, unlike in European countries, in which captalists had to deal with the feudal institutions that preceded them, so the american's argument made zero sense then and still makes zero sense now)

  • SuperZutsuki [they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    It's really like time has stopped for these people and they are no longer capable of comprehending new information

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      deleted by creator