John Brown killed 50 gorillion people after eating up all the grain in Kansas with his big spoon stalin-comical-spoon JB-shining-aggro

This guy is semi-notable on Twitter. He's best known for being kicked off a somewhat successful podcast for being a creep.

  • Sulvor [he/him, undecided]
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lmao blaming John Brown for the civil war is both extremely stupid and defending slavery.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]
      ·
      3 days ago

      Once again, it’s a very lucky coincidence that the “party of personal responsibility” is never personally responsible for anything ever.

    • RiotDoll [she/her, she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      been said but the harper's ferry raid was interesting because the second it got on the telegraph wire that it was happening/happened, journalists flocked and the coverage became a huge story, and that as an event/news cycle likely spurred on the civil war in a big way lol.

      Like it galvanized radical abolitionists and moderates alike, it spooked the shit out of the southern aristocracy. Both doubled down in response, the conditions for the civil war were laid

      it's an interesting cause and effect. It's also nowhere close to the only cause, but it kind of was the straw that broke the camel.

      edit: it's kind of weird to think about if it hadn't happened the way it did. What if it hadn't been covered in the same way? What if it was an obscure blip in west virginian history? Would we have gotten the war? would the outcome have been the same? would slavery have ended without the civil war? when? what would the post-emancipation landscape look like?

      no good answers, all speculative, but it's weirdly important as an event imo. It gets silo'd off as this sort of separate prelude, but it's kind of way more important than that. John Brown and his sons are literally created martyrs and its weird. it's real weird.

      • ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Pretty sure the civil war still would have happened, the contradiction between the southern slaver capitalists and the northern industrial capitalists had sharpened to the point that it could only be resolved by armed conflict.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]
      ·
      3 days ago

      It's not too unreasonable and this is an argument that Norm Finkelstein has made when discussing Al Aqsa Flood. Nat Turner's rebellion was an important inspiration for John Brown, then the Harper's Ferry Raid led pretty directly to the initial events of the Civil War. But acting like it's somehow a bad thing that the American Civil War happened is the most liberal ahistorical take on American history ever. What were slaves supposed to do? Vote?

      • BashfulBob [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        the Harper's Ferry Raid led pretty directly to the initial events of the Civil War

        The ambient fear of a national slave revolt was one Confederate leadership was obsessed with, despite the fact that these slave rebellions were extremely rare and never successful. Harper's Ferry was a kind-of 9/11 of its era, because it brought the ahem Sum of All Fears to this sudden realization. And the fact that it fell flat practically overnight didn't matter. It set of a wave of Bad Vibes (by way of mass media) that rocked the Southern States by forcing leaders to acknowledge the degree to which their institution was openly reviled. The governors of the Dixie States revolted under the naive assumption that they could quench the flames of abolitionism by crushing the northern states in a military conflict.

        Harper's Ferry became a rallying point for the Republican electoralists. And it likely helped mobilize support for Lincoln as a populist candidate by making the end of slavery look like a thing that was possible. But it didn't cause the Civil War, simply because it was one of the early dominoes to fall. It was merely a symptom of the disease that was slavery. In the same way that 9/11 was Blowback from half a century of American militarism and regime change in the Middle East.

        The cause of the Civil War was slavery and all the events leading up to the war were also the result of slavery. It would be more accurate to say that slavery caused The Harper's Ferry Raid than that the Raid caused the War.

        What were slaves supposed to do? Vote?

        Obviously, they were supposed to earn their freedom by working so hard that slavery went away on its own.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          "John Brown's body is rotting in the grave; his soul is marching on!"

          People who try to claim the civil war wasn't about slavery are fools or liars. The Union Marching song directly stated that the union army was the sword of an angry god coming down on the slavers in the name of freedom.

          Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord;

          He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;

          He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword; His truth is marching on.

          Glory! Glory! Hallelujah! Glory! Glory! Hallelujah! Glory! Glory! Hallelujah! His truth is marching on.

          I have seen Him in the watch-fires of a hundred circling camps;

          They have builded Him an altar in the evening dews and damps;

          I can read His righteous sentence by the dim and flaring lamps, His day is marching on.

          I have read His fiery gospel writ in rows of burnished steel!

          -"As ye deal with my condemners, so with you My grace shall deal!

          Let the Hero, born of woman, crush the serpent with his heel, " Since God is marching on.

          He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;

          He is sifting out the hearts of men before His judgment seat;

          Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer Him; be jubilant, my feet! Our God is marching on.

          In the beauty of the lilies Christ was born across the sea,

          With a glory in His bosom that transfigures you and me;

          As He died to make men holy, let us die to make men free! While God is marching on.

          People will tell you to your face that the war was about secular economics or some shit. I'm sure the haute boug thought that, but the normal people who volunteered and marched south with guns and uniforms they bought with their own money were on a holy crusade against evil.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            ·
            3 days ago

            but the normal people who volunteered and marched south with guns and uniforms they bought with their own money were on a holy crusade against evil.

            And the people who volunteered and marched north with guns and uniforms were the evil.

          • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I remember singing that song/hymn in church as a kid. Though I think the lyric was changed to "let us live to make men free".

    • buh [she/her]
      ·
      3 days ago

      big "communists killed millions of german soldiers in the 1940s" energy

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]
    ·
    3 days ago

    History should not happen, actually. Everything should remain as it is, and any movement to liberate the oppressed people of the world must do so purely by begging at the feet of their oppressors.

  • SadArtemis [she/her]
    ·
    3 days ago

    Unlimited death and destruction on slavers and settlers, the only fault with Nat and John Brown (RIP heroes) is they didn't finish the job

  • booty [he/him]
    ·
    3 days ago

    John Brown caused the civil war????? Holy shit that is a take

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The implication is amazing too: "That was bad; the civil war should never have happened and slavery should have continued as-is. Cheap cotton and sugar treats."

      JB-shining-aggro so-true

      • combat_doomerism [he/him]
        ·
        3 days ago

        slavery should have continued as-is

        of course not. all abolitionists needed to do was vote harder. vote blue no matter who!!!

        (I am aware that it was the republicans who were anti-slavery)

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          3 days ago

          (I am aware that it was the republicans who were anti-slavery)

          The modern GOP still waves that historical moment around to this day, too.

          • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
            ·
            3 days ago

            Imagine the last time your group did something good was 150 years ago and you act like that's something to be proud of.

            • combat_doomerism [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              they just use it to dunk on democrats as being "the REAL racists" but they know how ridiculous they're being, satre quote absurdity of their replies etc etc

          • combat_doomerism [he/him]
            ·
            3 days ago

            of course, they're always reluctant to explain why republicans became so popular in the south with the "southern strategy" lol

            • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
              ·
              2 days ago

              They also neglect to acknowledge why they wanted to end slavery, not the goodness of their hearts, but because they were scared of a slave revolution.

  • HelluvaBottomCarter [comrade/them]
    ·
    3 days ago

    This guy is semi-notable on Twitter. He's best known for being kicked off a somewhat successful podcast for being a creep.

    I mean, you gotta be more specific.

  • Rojo27 [he/him]
    ·
    3 days ago

    I wouldn't celebrate Independence Day. It only came after a bloody war and created the most genocidal state in history.

  • WhyEssEff [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    what else did the civil war do mr nicholson. what was that war about mr nicholson. what happened after that war mr nicholson

  • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]
    ·
    3 days ago

    Blaming revolutionaries for reactionaries' responses to their actions inevitably ignores the fact that the reactionaries were already doing and would continue to do the horrible acts in question. 200 people being lynched barely qualifies as an average Tuesday under chattel slavery, but anti-cracker-aktion here acts like it was an unexpected event that could only happen if the slaves dared to demand their freedom at gunpoint.

    • VHS [he/him]
      ·
      3 days ago

      The Nazis would also regularly engage in mass killing of civilians in reprisal for resistance actions in the area. Most people seem to have the good sense not to condemn anti-Fascist militancy though

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        ·
        2 days ago

        They absolutely condemn anti-fascist action. They do it in the moment and do what they can to punish the antifascists while also comforting the fascists. After a few decades, however, they will claim they were the antifascists and were the ones fighting for what is right...

  • ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    3 days ago

    the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice

    mlk-yes

  • Des [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    3 days ago

    god i want John Brown to stop a moulderin' for five minutes and march on this guy's skull until it's kind of like a squished melon JB-shining-aggro melon-musk

  • Infamousblt [any]
    ·
    3 days ago

    The only history that matters is the history I've made up in my head ppb-gigachad