- cross-posted to:
- chat
You must log in or register to comment.
Has the energy of "As a black man I'm sorry for all the crimes we commit 😔"
It's funny, because Dan Crenshaw tried to pull this shit a few weeks ago on his Podcast. He invited on a Candice Owens style trans-conservative who can whine about other trans-people and call the community a bunch of pedophiles.
But the response to the episode was to associate his guest with the thing he was trying to stigmatize. People were horrified and disgusted at Dan for inviting on a trans-person. Meanwhile, Dan's feed isn't consumed by local Texas Liberals, so he wasn't able to propagate the "Good Trans-Activist criticizes Bad Trans-Activists" lie to the audience for which it was intended.
Modern conservatism is far too rarified to support this kind of dialogue. It only works when presented by Bloomberg-crat liberals.
Dan Crenshaw has a podcast? Okay I think it’s time for the podcast bubble to burst now...
-Soulja
Of course it’s written by a self-hating strasserist.
https://old.reddit.com/user/NotMissStrasser/comments/lpu1f8/lots_of_test_results/
This was one of the stupider chud ops, and that's saying something
When the ok sign thing "worked" (i.e. people started identifying a symbol used by white supremacists as a white supremacist symbol) they clearly got this idea in their heads that they're master manipulators who play the sjws and the media like a fiddle, but since then it's been flop after flop. Like this shouldn't even really be that hard if their standard for success was met by the ok sign.
Same deluded thought process as the capitol hill rioters (because they're the same people). It's almost as if a bunch of racists and racist adjacent/enabling assholes are too dumb to realize that doing things only other racist assholes do isn't "playing" anyone in the end but themselves.
This is one hundred percent true but so much of their shit doesn't even meet that mediocre bar. For example remember how the next thing they tried to push right after that was drinking milk as a white supremacist symbol? Like how the fuck would that even work, millions of people drink milk every day, there was never any chance that people were going to try and "cancel milk" like they would with a hand signal that identifies someone as a fascist.
Their problem is that they believe their own propaganda. They don't portray their opponents as mindless "NPCs" as a political strategy, they legitmately believe that they are the only human beings capable of rational thought (heh), so they repeatedly misunderstand and underestimate the opposition.
And even better they tell on themselves by being the only weirdos in the world walking around aggressively drinking milk. :milkshake:
Nazis walking to the front of a protest line to aggressively slug back a 2L bottle of milk
Like how the fuck would that even work
They think we're gonna go around yelling at everyone who's doing some innocuous thing, instead of laughing at the fucking dweebs sitting there pointedly doing an innocuous thing trying to get a reaction.
clearly got this idea in their heads that they’re master manipulators who play the sjws and the media like a fiddle
nazi failsons: "Nooo, you can't say that any random white American is a crypto-fascist!"
also failsons: "Taylor Swift is a white nationalist"
people: "well she is a white liberal, that's 90% of nazism"
nazis: :shocked-pikachu:
I'm pretty sure this was an attempt at an "it's okay to be white" type of thing. The backlash is the desired reaction, so things are sadly still going according to plan.
So much self righteousness. So much hand wringing. "It's getting harder and harder for me to support the transexual community" fuck off dork ass loser
Which is funny because I find it easier and easier to just be like "no the trans people are right" without even examining what they're whining about
WTF is even a super straight? Is it those men who won't wash their arseholes because touching it would be too gay?
Boring people. Probably a large overlap between them and the ones I imagined.
get fukt, cry more, git gud, eat shit
I am trashman 2021
5,937,011,452,636 dead TERFS
I prefer vaginas! See literally nobody cares. Why do they always pretend they are a victim of something that doesn't even happen?
Want to tell us about your racial preference next? This isn't a bit, don't bring this kind of 'acceptable bigotry' discourse to here. :gui-trans:
Sexual orientation is based on gender. Its not based on race or 'vagina' or whatever terfy nonsense has been put in your head by society.
'Preference' is TERF speak for discrimination.
Its not my job educate you, learn to be a better ally or don't post on trans topics.
It's also not based on hair color. I still prefer dark haired people and tallness though. You are looking for bigotry in a place where there isn't any. I literally was denouncing 'superstraight' as stupid transphobic nonsense in my original reply. But because I am not attracted sexually to something (dick in this case, to be clear, not trans people) doesn't mean I don't believe people with dicks aren't-, or attraction to dicks isn't valid.
Not sure why you are getting so much hate. You said you are attracted to trans men, cis women, and post-op transwomen because you are attracted to vaginas. That’s your preference, how is anyone going to try to say that isn’t valid? People are attracted to lots of different things IME and shouldn’t be shamed for that. I support you comrade
-Soulja
I don't know what word to use if not "preference". People have preferences.
Same. If I get rejected because I'm a woman with a penis and someone doesn't like dicks, I'm not going to feel attacked because I'm not being rejected for being trans.
But if I get bottom surgery and a sweet new vagina, and someone else thinks I'm a woman with a vagina, they really need to examine themselves if they suddenly change their minds when they find out the vagina is a new feature. At that point, the only reason why I'm being rejected is because I'm trans. OR, maybe it's because I have a lot of body hair! In which case, that's fine by me. I'm not being singled out for being trans, there's plenty of cis women who like their body hair and some people don't find that appealing.
Tl;dr I think it's always possible to reject someone without being transphobic. So when someone says they're not interested because I'm trans, then they're being transphobic, because I guarantee there exists a trans person who they would otherwise find attractive.
People have preferences
Not just, but there are so many things that factor into any individual person's sexual attraction. People don't even find everyone within that "preference" umbrella to be attractive. Putting on my Ben Shapiro voice - let's say, hypothetically, that I'm only attracted to men. This doesn't mean that I find all men attractive, or that my genitals get all hot and bothered by someone just for being a man. Expecting people to experience sexual attraction towards someone (I mean, expecting this at all is uuuhhhhhhhhhhh) because they fall under this massive categorical umbrella is... pretty weird, and feels like essentialism.
And also, this discourse veers uncomfortably close to the right wing rhetoric about homosexuality being a choice. And that ain't great.
I would go to super straight if I wanted to argue with braindead cissies.
You're so contrarian you cant fucking accept youre wrong no matter what. Im done, don't bother replying. Ive already reported this.
Big brain take: maybe they're bi and find a certain set of genitals attractive? Like, they're into trans men (who haven't had bottom surgery), cis women, and post op trans women, etc.
But given the context it sounds like they're using vaginas as a shorthand for cis women...not a good look.
If they’re using vaginas as a shorthand for cis women though…no.
I am not. And I get the apprehensive response because of the amount of transphobia, but that doesn't make it bigotry to not like dick. If a woman or man has a vagina. I'm into that. trans woman included. But I find this policing of sexual preference really awkward and a bit weird. What I like in the bedroom shouldn't be something I have to defend. what the fuck.
The problem is noone fucking asked. Its like randomly announcing you have a preference for white people.
Weird at best, dogwhistling at worst. Dont use Terf language ffs.
Thanks for clarifying! I think the added context here is important because like you said, it's a sensitive issue.
They're prudes and they feel attacked any time they see something they don't like.
Yeah I have at least 1 good trans friend and she has said that never in her life has she criticized someone for being exclusively into vaginas or dicks, or only into cis men or women. I think she’s even said something like why would you think you can force a preference onto someone? It doesn’t make any sense. She’s always done very well in her dating life since I’ve known her, so the idea that she or any other transwoman would scold someone for only dating cis women feels absurd and not something that actually happens in real life. Then again chuds making up things to be mad about shouldn’t be surprising lol
-Soulja
Sucks to suck. It's funny they have to explain super-straight every time they mention it. I'm sure the bumper stickers will be pithy.
Bigots morphing into crybabies when they get owned is among my favorite things to witness. If you want to sow the seeds of transphobia you get to reap the fucking whirlwind.
What kind of loser wants to be super straight?
Super strength I'd take but super straight? Fuck that noise.
Super strength may not be enough to destroy capitalism and terfs but it would help.
:sicko-crab: Fuck. Terfs. Bigoted assholes, glad they were banned
I had a “friend” who called themselves super straight lol this makes me extremely happy
