For me it's anything involving cars or horses, also american football, and sumo, how about anything in general that intentionally harms the players health just by playing?

  • ssjmarx [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think wanting to outright ban certain sports is a reactionary mindset. Sports are what the people will do with their time when they've reclaimed it from the capitalists, the only thing that should be done is to reform them.

    Golf is cool when it uses the terrain and plants of the area it's located in, and when it's a park that those who live by it all have joint ownership of and access to. Yeah it's an inefficient use of space, but so are parks generally and we want to have those in our better future.

    Anything involving animals is more difficult to call. Obviously animal competition in its current form is a breeding ground for cruelty and must be stopped - but animals like to play too, so i think that some kind of amateur setup with strong animal welfare safeguards is possible and preferable to banning those sports outright.

    • Foolio [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Golf is one of those things like hunting/guns or boating, where your perception is highly colored by where you grew up. I grew up in a place where all of those things were very accessible to ordinary working people (municipal courses in wet climate, lots of places to put a boat in, lots of state hunting land and a strong cabin culture), within reason, so it took me a bit understood the attacks on "beautiful boaters" and such.

      • ElGosso [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I honestly think hunting is more morally justifiable than golf is, as long as it's controlled. I live in an area where nearly all the deer's natural predators have been driven to extinction so the only thing left keeping their population from overrunning the ecosystem is people.

        • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          We intentionally drive those predators to extinction though, partially so there are more deer to shoot

          • ElGosso [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Well also because they'll tear you in half if you walk between them and their favorite trashcan

    • machiabelly [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its super obvious that the doggie obstical course dogs are having a great time. Stuff like that is something that could totally translate into the ~good future~

    • Dingus_Khan [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      and when it’s a park that those who live by it all have joint ownership of and access to.

      You'd have to make it like a time share situation for that to work, getting hit by a golf ball is really dangerous

      • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Booking tee-times? There are public golf courses (City-run, still pay but don't need country club membership), the stupid shit is when they make lush grass ones in arizona or california.

        If there were Mario-golf style themed courses in deserts it wouldn't be as terrible there either, just sucks because rich people form the area for the golf course instead of the other way around.

      • esjalapeno [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        2 years ago

        How about we stop making dogs drag people behind on sleds too.

        • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Is Dog Sledding really that bad? Like the non-racing kind, not the long marathon style ones.

          I would hope it'd be better with how it's tied into Inuit culture. Inherently it's not worse than any other working dog, but I also know nothing about northern dogs physiology. The main thing about dogs in general is how bad the inbreeding gets because of stupid breed standard, but I don't think people with working dogs care about doing that stuff as much.

          • Owl [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Sled dogs really, really like pulling sleds. I just saw some getting ready to go once, and they were like... vibrating with excitement. Like a dog that gets really excited about going on a walk, but way more so.

            I don't know anything else about the conditions of sled dogs.

            • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Over hundreds of years we created creatures that are so purely happy to do the task we need them to do. Nothing in the world excites them more than the thing we need them to do. Ngl that’s pretty cool

              • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
                ·
                2 years ago

                To paraphrase Cesar Millan, every animal wants to have a purpose, and gets satisfaction out of engaging in it.

              • Owl [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yeah, kind of cool. Also pretty creepy to be honest. But the dogs are like that now, regardless.

          • esjalapeno [he/him]
            hexagon
            ·
            2 years ago

            Were not having a natives peoples use of animals struggle session here.

        • BolsheWitch [she/her, they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          probably checks out. I don't know enough about Iditarod- style racing to know if that's possible to adapt / salvage. I've heard it's significantly less messed up and focused around consent from the dog's somehow(?) that also came from people who do it, however, so :fry:

        • BigAssBlueBug [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I thought Huskies liked to do it, so long as the group isnt pulling anything too heavy

          • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            They do, sled dogs fucking love pulling sleds. Watch videos of them and right before a race they look like a dog that can’t contain its excitement to go on a walk

            The same goes for being out on the snow in general, people who have arctic dogs in the snow can hardly get them to come inside

    • esjalapeno [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      a thousand white faces drinking burbon on a 90 degree day in kentucky yelling at horses to go faster.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The head injuries in American football, for sanity's sake, should be mitigated by extensive revisions of the rules if the sport should continue at all. Concussions have lifelong consequences and spouses and other family members have to suffer those as well.

    Yes, this take threatens the football treat. I stand by it.

    • jkfjfhkdfgdfb [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      can it even be fixed? would it be remotely the same sport? better to just get rid of it probably

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        If the sport requires head injuries to function and exist, and the sport loses its identity without having predictable and necessary lifetime sufferers of concussions consequently beating their wives and children, I don't know.

        • TerminalEncounter [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          How dare you threaten my caveman sport of hitting each other with giant clubs until one of us collapses?!?

          • jkfjfhkdfgdfb [she/her]
            ·
            2 years ago

            i'd rather watch that than football, at least

            (yeah yeah i know it's also bad)

      • Vncredleader
        ·
        2 years ago

        Probably true. Unless it become professional touch football. Current football is somehow safer than it used to be FFS.

        • Owl [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Flag football, while incredibly dorky, solves this and makes refereeing clearer.

          Actually, being incredibly dorky is a plus.

      • Quimby [any, any]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        it definitely can be. rugby is similar and doesn't have the same head injury problem because the rules mandate wrap up tackles and, ironically, because they don't wear pads and helmets. the pads and helmets actually made things worse from a TBI perspective.

        EDIT: It turns out Rugby does still have a concussion problem. RIP

        • jkfjfhkdfgdfb [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          is that, like, just less fucked than american football, or actually not a problem at all?

          • Quimby [any, any]
            ·
            2 years ago

            actually, your question had me do more research, and I think I was wrong. it seems that rugby still has a problem with head injuries.

  • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    for me the ones that potentially harm the players are fine (within reason) if it's an informed, non-coerced choice by the participant

    ones that require a horse can get fucked though

    • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      if it’s an informed, non-coerced choice by the participant

      Didn't the NFL and other sports organizations cover up information about CTE risk?

    • esjalapeno [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      There's a risk of injury for all physical activity, sports that have an unreasonable risk like American football should be banned. Personally I think anything that has physical contact shouldn't be played by children. Martial arts maybe the only exception because knowing self defense outweighs the physical injury from the sport itself. Of course we shouldn't have children training for mma.

  • solaranus
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • PrideBoy [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Banning sports is stupid. Let’s make more and better ones

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Idk sports are such a huge part of our culture that I don't see it ever going away and I personally wouldn't want them to be anyway. They're a great way to bring people together and create a sense of community in places where that sense is being challenged. Futbol and weightlifting have taken a lot of troubled teens and put their frustrations to better use than joining gangs.

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      martial arts isn't bad for your body though and practitioners are very careful about not injuring each other

      it's a pretty good workout too as the adrenaline makes you not realise your tired till after

      • Vampire [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        practitioners are very careful about not injuring each other

        This is not true at all. The intent is to hurt your opponent. (I am a practitioner.)

        • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mean long term injury if for example you were in a judo match you would stop the second your opponent tapped the mat

    • fanbois [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Martial arts are perfectly fine. If you actually mean MMA as a combat sport, it gets much more complicated. I don't think people should intentionally give each other concussions or break each other's legs for money. MMA training on the other seems like a fantastic work out.

  • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    anything that uses fossil fuels. if those NASCAR losers wanna play their Left-Turn-Dont-Earnhardt shit, better call up the eggheads and figure out some electrics or magnets or some shit.

    • esjalapeno [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      NASCAR isn't even the biggest offender, formula one is way worse.

  • LeninWalksTheWorld [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sumo is cool though. Why ban it? Just because some of the wrestlers are too fat? It's safer than MMA since there's no punching and stuff. Not to mention it has a lot of cultural value in japan and is the only country with a serious sumo presence anyway.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sumo wrestlers are fat but not obese like normal people that is a common myth.

      First they have a lot of muscle mass and to maintain that they do a lot of exercise(and I mean a lot), and most importantly the fat is accumulated underneath the skin(subcutaneous fat) and not inside the organs(visceral fat).

      Visceral fat is very bad for your health but subcutaneous fat is not as bad or at all. I think the scientific consensus is that sumo wrestlers are healthier than most Americans and probably about on par with the normal Japanese. It is not perfect once they retire they suffer a bit if they don't control the weight, but during their career they are healthy.

    • mrcumpress [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It's not. It reduces their lifespan by ~10 years and unlike mma no one gives a fuck how hamburger your brain becomes. Shit's brutal af

      And the "fat" helps cushion them and let's them hit extremely hard

    • HoChiMaxh [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Motorsports are unquestionably lame, but I'm not sure that's a sufficient reason to ban them. Lots of sports are lame.

      • Tomboys_are_Cute [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Motorsports use fossil fuels, until sufficient electronic vehicles are made (ignoring the embodied carbon in making them) there isn't really a place to be burning fuel for fun like that

        • HoChiMaxh [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don't know, I think the amount of fossil fuels used specifically for motor sports is pretty small relative to the number of people they entertain and they are not the reason we have a climate crisis.

          If you want to go down the list of marginal emission luxury activities that we should eliminate, like you'll be eliminating a lot of much more basic luxuries like having access to food that can't be grown within like 1000km of you and shit before you get to like ten guys trying to go around a track as fast as possible.

            • HoChiMaxh [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Sure, I mean I'm fine with all of that if that's what it takes, I just think that's not the best way to think about climate action. Like we don't have to bring everything to zero and end all treats, we just have to address a few major things seriously (like how we design and interconnect metropoles, renewable in the energy grid, cattle and tropical fruits in diets, home size, monitoring and reducing flights, international shipping, etc). Like if we do those things right there are a lot of basic niceties that would still be fine, like having access to a personal vehicle to go hiking on the weekend or something isn't actually that big a problem.

          • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Transportation is a pretty tiny part of the footprint of most foods. You'll lose your red meat before your imported veggies.

        • esjalapeno [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          2 years ago

          My hatred of motorsports has less to do with the fossil fuels and more to do with the amount of land racetracks occupy. Shit can be worse than a golf course.

          • DonaldJBrandon [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            There are waaaay less tracks though. And they don't require nearly as much maintainence, yeah they need to be resurfaced every so often but it's not like golf courses

    • DonaldJBrandon [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Motorsports are great imo. Simracing is very fun, and that has gotten me into watching motorsports, which are very fun to watch. If ultimately everything moved over to electric though (looks like it will in the coming years), that would be fine.

      Motorsports though ultimately don't burn a significant amount of fossil fuels compared to the larger population. I don't see why it should be banned now, we should focus on changing infrastructure

  • RNAi [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Boxing and etc, that shit gives permanent brain damage to most practitioners

    • Vampire [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ban boxinhg and I'm out of your revolution

      • RNAi [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        You weren't even invited in the first place

    • CloutAtlas [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Didn't bare knuckle boxing come with fewer fatalities and less concussions?

      • RNAi [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe because people stopped much earlier cuz the blood was messing everything