https://twitter.com/BlackRadAnarcho/status/1653901105229860864?s=20
KILLMONGER IS FAKE!
A FABRICATION
THE WRITERS MADE HIM UP WHOLECLOTH
i will continue basing my politics on the talking cat from Kiki's delivery service
Aside from being fictional, the Killmonger standard was having the capability to and actually trying to give make believe future tech weapons to black people. Not like being a sad so sorry troop.
Can the sectarianism, I could find 100 self identified MLs on twitter with dogshit takes.
Just saw a ML last week on twitter saying that if Russian troops were r**ing Ukrainians it would be justified because of imperialism sooo yeah
Twitter is just where bad takes go to germinate
true, there are lots of good anarchist comrades in my country, but they seem to have completely lost the plot over in burgerland, changed the title.
This is very hexbear doctrinaire of me to say, but there's a meaningful distinction to be made between anarchist activists and online "anarchists" who just parrot stupid liberal talking points while being into communes.
Yes, you're right. The last time I heard open Nazi apologia in person it was from an anarchist (the time before that it was a libertarian, before that a literal neo-nazi, and that's it). There's a reason I said it was "doctrinaire hexbear" because, like a lot of hexbear doctrine, it's a myth that is at best useful as a heuristic (or just useful for moderation).
But think of it this way, on the internet it's most anarchists that are anarcho-bidenists and offline it's only maybe half in the first world and less than half in most other places.
Stalin was basically correct, I just take the extremely condescending attitude that if we play nice many of the anarchists will learn better, because "anarchism" is a much more accessible ideology in the first world than ML, and not by accident . Being a jerk about it doesn't do anything useful except alienate the people who think explicit ideological incoherence is a virtue, which isn't a group even worth fighting most of the time.
Yeah, probably. I'm thinking about how there are a couple of not-really-chill-with-MLs who have held on and I'm wondering if the sectarianism rules still end up creating an environment in favor of MLs, since anarchists only have so much to point to positively compared to MLs and most of the criticisms of anarchism go nearly without saying when the question of "how do we change this?" is discussed. I'm fine with that, of course, but it's something where I always just sort of idly assumed the antithesis more than anything (and didn't really care anyway).
It probably helps that when anarchists in other spaces do the "tankies murder us!" routine the main things they point to (e.g. Makhnovists) are flimsy as shit upon any inspection of the parties involved.
Here's a fun one about Makhno's exile in France:
June 1926, during a meal with Alexander Berkman and May Picqueray in a Russian restaurant, Makhno met with the Ukrainian Jewish anarchist Sholem Schwarzbard, who went pale upon seeing the Ukrainian nationalist leader Symon Petliura walk into the room. Schwarzbard immediately informed the Batko of his intentions to assassinate Petliura, in revenge for the pogroms carried out in the Ukrainian People's Republic, during which some of his family members had been killed. Makhno attempted to dissuade him but the deed was carried out anyway, with Schwarzbard's subsequent trial bringing to light a trove of documentary evidence on the pogroms in Ukraine, exonerating the assassin.
idk, I just massively respect Schwarzbard for seeing his shot and taking it. Makhno is a huge coward for telling him to stand down instead of backing him up.
Appreciate it, don't like to see anarchists catching strays on account of idiots on social media.
Thanks for changing! Mind adding a CW for the nword? Gotten a few requests. Cheers!
Let a hundred dunks bloom then. Post shitty ML takes and I'll dunk on them right alongside you.
The Twitter user shouldn't get immunity from being dunked on for their incredibly shitty take just because they profess to be an anarchist.
I’m not saying this. OP edited the title, which was originally just bagging on anarchists in general.
Can someone ELI5? In good faith I don't understand what is being advocated for or how it's sectarian. I can glean that the Black Radical Anarchist is the one with the garbage take as his citation is Marvel. It seems to me that they're both agreeing that joining the military is problematic so I don't get what they're arguing about.
this guys been all over my twit lately crying about how US soldiers are just poor boys forced to volunteer to murder brown people even poorer than themselves for some free college and a camero.
Ok. I mean, sure.
I hate the military too.
But what’s your end goal here? Just to post memes and dunks? Because you’re not going to do anything more by posting like this.
If you actually want a revolution in the West, especially the US, you need to gain the support of a significant chunk of the military. There’s no other way. And the people in the military who are open to being radicalised are precisely the “poor boys” you’re criticising right now.
Make no mistake, there are plenty of chuds from chud families who go into the military literally so they can kill brown people. Nothing you or I will say can change their minds. They must be fought and defeated.
But you will not succeed in that without the support of the people in the military who are also oppressed by those same structures of power.
But what’s your end goal here? Just to post memes and dunks?
yes, this is literally the dunk tank
If you actually want a revolution in the West, especially the US
lmao there will never be a leftist revolution in the US precisely because it's the imperial core and material conditions won't allow it. You can barely get enough people to protest the constant murders of black people there by the state.
the idea that the US will have a leftist revolution without a massive shift in global conditions first is just delusional
Is that what people are saying, though? Massive shifts in global conditions are happening now.
massive shifts in global conditions don't need to happen first, they're happening alongside our efforts. We're at least a decade away from major potential within the imperial core as far as I can tell, but a lot of that potential that we look forward to takes years to grow. Planting the seeds now is essential
leftists who think differently to me are mentally ill
why are you like this?
without a massive shift in global conditions first
global conditions are in constant flux, i agree it would be a mistake to assume that the US left is ready to wage revolution in its current nonexistent form, however it doesnt mean a happening is impossible
lmao there will never be a leftist revolution in the US precisely because it’s the imperial core and material conditions won’t allow it.
:fedposting:
Are there any other disagreeable groups we absolutely need to extend olive branches to in order to win their loyalty, in spite of any collective and individual crimes?
It surely wouldn't hurt to have some cops on our side, and I mean I have heard enough jokes about cop school being the last resort for small town fuckup bullies to draw a conclusion that some can be turned around.
Talking seriously though, this is in no way an alternative to being mean to and alienating imperialist veterans, there must be a line drawn when it comes to how veterans actually have to atone and repay their victims before they can seriously be considered revolutionary allies. Just being sad about it and deciding to be a leftist at home isn't enough, you've still benefited from participating in international crimes and those victims rarely get to come back to the states for those same benefits.
We cant seriously sit around and decide that "we have no choice but appeasement" is a serious strategy, if we must absolutely have a strategy.
Catholic sacrament of penance brain.
I mean this insultingly, you cannot be absolved of imperialist deeds by words and thoughts alone.
how do you feel about punishing nazis in their 80s? Or about that lady that got emmett till lynched? or did they get old enough that their crimes are just who cares now to you
the problem is it's immaterial. if you want to kill them that's fine, if you want to call it justice that's fine, but it isn't meaningfully impacting anything so it isn't praxis.
at least for the purposes of the thought experiment. in reality an 80-year-old could still be contributing materially to systemic harm. in which case ridding the world of them is a good thing.
Meme answer: kick old Nazis down the stairs etc. etc.
Serious answer: Not for me to decide, their fates are up to the victims. If they decide death penalty then so be it I will gladly help them. If not then nothing will be done. Theyre fucking old, dying, and harmless, nothing worth taking initiative on.
nazi vets in their 80s still cause harm but people who were part of the US imperial machine dont?
i mentioned nazis in their 80s as in people who were part of the nazi party and were later found and brought to trial during more modern times. This is also why I brought up the emmett till accuser, as she was similarly old and yet still had not faced justice. I'm saying that if you believe those people are still a harm to society, then you must also be able to see why people who were part of the US military system should fall under similar scrutiny. If that is not what you were saying, if there was a miss-step in communication then I'm sorry.
i feel like my point is being lost in the weeds of semantics and not seen for what it is, which is that I think it’s entirely fair for people to have misgivings about people who were part of the imperial complex, regardless of their current sympathies, that’s all
What do you think the vast majority of troops are? The vast majority of troops are sorry about their service, they're just depressed that their war crimes make them sad.
I spent a fair bit of time last night suggesting that maybe a veteran being "repentant" requires supporting their victims in some real way.
Really not sure why you keep going to accusing people of wanting veterans to physically suffer when in most cases its about simply not accepting war crime participants into movements and organizations, and being verbally mean to them about it.
Uh, because I, um, assumed, that this conversation was about something different. Excluding veterans from organizations makes perfect sense
A case of two sides aggressively agreeing 🤣
I am going to jump on that 80 year old mans head so he becomes a squished man of exactly halved height.
Tell me where I have mentioned 80 year old men, and tell me where I have mentioned physically hurting veterans as a moral service?
To my knowledge I have only ever argued that veterans should not be accepted as leftists just because after they got back and got all the nice benefits like an education or whatever, they decided to utter the correct phrases and jargon and therefore got baptised into good leftists now. Instead I think the bare minimum is that they should materially support the victims of American wars, who do not get any benefits, who get their schools blown up actually.
Some international solidarity is the bare minimum for a leftist veteran, and not just turning around and being critical of the US military, or doing mutual aid back in AmeriKKKa.
I would say that I take issue with the "improve the world" part of that, cause I dont think these veterans would really want to improve the world so much as improve the immediate circumstances in the US.
But Im not sure if arguing further is going to be very productive, seems like its a lot of semantics now and its getting really late.
This is a really good critique, comrade. We need to be thinking about goals and outcomes. Retribution and justice may be good motivators for people to rally around, but they're immaterial concepts in and of themselves.
At least my overall point is that these soldiers seem to primarily care about their personal outcomes, and the outcomes for people in America.
While largely ignoring the outcomes of countries victimised by Americas military beyond the idea that if there's revolution or reform in the US that will also make the US stop victimising these countries.
It's not fuck you got mine but more like "sorry for you, at least I got mine." The analysis of goals and outcomes can't end at the border of the states.
People like to bring up veterans in thr Black Panthers, but they certainly expressed international solidarity with the victims of US imperialism and supported their struggle.
While my personal experience with veterans of the Middle East is that in most cases their activism is focuses on just getting the US out of interventions, without really focusing on the primary victims.
I agree with you in general, my problem is with the moralistic framing. But largely I think the conclusion is the same. It's an important distinction, though, for acute or other circumstances where a moralistic framing and a materialist framing have different conclusions.
Moralistic framing of this is saying veterans are a lost cause because of past action / sin. Materialist framing would say veterans might be a lost cause because they don't have much revolutionary potential as a demographic, in my opinion, due to a variety of material and cultural influences.
But if somehow veterans as a demographic did have revolutionary potential, it would be important to recognize this and capitalize on it, rather than letting moralism cloud our judgement. Before the draft was abolished, for example, there was less selection for ideological purity, meaning a larger subsection of the demographic might be receptive to anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist sentiment. But I'm skeptical that the "poverty draft" has enough of a similar effect, even among veteran minorities. It may still be a useful long-term goal to see if we can come up with effective strategies to radicalize soldiers/veterans.
You are still maintaining some variety of Christian penance brain if you understand things in terms of "absolution".
I am using that kind of language because thats the language I see people use out in the wild for veterans.
Its a rhetorical flair.
I don’t take issue with critiquing the military, but with dunking on the “poor boys” as OP did.
Cops are a good example of this. I’m sure ACAB alienates some folks. I don’t care about that. I think it’s a good slogan and cops are, in general, bad. But this post (specifically the comment I was replying to and the greater context of why this BS even started) is similar to dunking on black and brown cops rather the system or even on the white thumbs overwhelmingly in charge of it. It’s a very weird hill to die on.
Should black and brown cops be criticised? Absolutely. But you can’t deny it’s kinda sus to focus on them rather than any other or the system they’re a part of.
They didn’t mention it but this all started because a leftist veteran died recently and a certain empanada on Twitter meme’d about it.
And OP already claimed they don’t believe revolution is possible so I don’t see a need to argue the point further with them. If all you want to do is meme and doom post, then there’s clearly no reason to take you seriously.
Edit: Also, the main point I was making still stands. I don’t think it’s possible to have a revolution in the West, especially America, without having a chunk of the military on your side. And that chunk will have to be people like the ones OP is dunking on.
The reason that "poor boys" get dunked on is the same reason that "good cops", ethnic minority cops or even "queer cops" get dunked on and focused on.
Their existence is presented and focused upon as one line of defense in favor of these systems, so critiques will go after these groups since they have been made into a living argument.
Theres endless further examples of this kind of shit too, vegan IDF, neurodivergent CIA agents, gamer drone pilots.
Hating the troops is literally mainstream now. Remember Trump going mask off and calling them losers and suckers? That's not controversial anymore, you just can't say it out loud in polite company, but no one "respects" the troops except the biggest liberals and rubes. It's not some epic dunk on the right wing or the imperialists to hate soldiers, they don't like them either.
Imo this attitude should be exploited by the left. The best way to help "the troops" is to put an end to imperialist ventures they get sent on.
Goad the right into doing that whole "defend America" thing. Then point out the troops aren't defending America, they're starting wars in distant foreign lands.
If you actually want a revolution in the West, especially the US, you need to gain the support of a significant chunk of the military. There’s no other way. And the people in the military who are open to being radicalised are precisely the “poor boys” you’re criticising right now.
In my experience, the vast majority of veterans are either broken people who need help more than they can provide, true believers who will go down with the settler-colonial ship, or completely unhinged who give off spree shooter vibes. The idea that veterans will impact us with their hardcore combat training is complete bogus. Most veterans have mundane jobs at the military with identical civilian counterparts. One veteran I know spend his service driving trucks in Germany. How is he any different from the millions of civilian truck drivers? Another had combat experience in Iraq, the stereotype of the vet who'll give us loser civilians the combat experience we desperately need, except he basically slept right next to a burn pit throughout his time in Iraq, which means you know his lungs are absolutely fucked. Last time I check up on him, he was going to get a colonoscopy as a 35 year old man because someone from his platoon who also had to sleep next to those burn pits got colon cancer.
I wish people would mystify veterans less. They're not that different from civilians at the end of the day.
No, we need to split the active military personnel. I’m not talking about old dudes here.
I'm not sure how you would directly reach people in active duty. Even people like Mike Prysner mostly target vets. It's not like you could just walk to a military base and hand out pamphlets to random soldiers. Active soldiers also have their social media completely monitored. All those Tiktoks of soldiers dicking around or posting thirst traps should be understood as part of a massive PR/psyop campaign that aims to humanize soldiers in front of an increasingly skeptical and cynical public. Not every single psyop attempt is as cringey as the army trying to form an esports team. Those Tiktoks are completely inorganic.
Making inroads with military to propagandize 👍
Thinking you can join in and change anything 👎
Unless you are deep sabotage operator, but you’ll have to carry your beliefs for 10 years to get into position to act on them.
Or you can throw nuts into air intakes
I'd edit the title to be non-sectarian.
Tweet is incredible :brainworms:
TFW you surgically replace your frontal cortex with the MCU box set.
God, I hate people pointing to works of fiction to back up and justify their takes.
Someone literally made that up out of whole cloth, you nerd.
Can we get a cw on this post I don’t want to see the nword.
