cognitohazard jokermala cognitohazard

89k likes btw

  • SoyViking [he/him]
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Within the confines of the idiotic US supreme court system, getting your loyalists to retire when you're able to pick their successors ought to be considered basic housekeeping but to libs it remains a wild fantasy.

  • LaBellaLotta [any]
    ·
    8 hours ago

    When you only ever reward losers it shouldn’t be a surprise when you only ever lose

  • mango [any]
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is how Bernie can win

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Their "mind blowing fantasy" is Kamala replacing a liberal justice's seat so she can lose in perpetuity instead of just a few times

      I guess that's kind of funny

      • CTHlurker [he/him]
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Tbf, it's pretty funny that their idea of an own is to put Kamala into what is basically purgatory.

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]
      ·
      9 hours ago

      "Even in libs' wildest fantasies written by Aaron Sorkin, they still compromise with Republicans."

    • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Their fantasies are just whatever the dems last told them they wanted to do.

      Say Adolf Hitler (D) loses in 2028 and a generic Democrat found a genie, all three wishes would be for Hitler to be president.

    • Redcuban1959 [any]
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Even FDR attempted to stack the courts and they didn't let him

  • micnd90 [he/him,any]
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    KHivers need to assassinate not only Sotomayor, but a couple of Republican senators in a state with Democratic Governor because sure as hell Manchin and Sinema are not going to vote Kamalol into the Supereme Court. If they are serious and pulled this off, then godspeed.

  • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Really does tick me off how useless libs are. Adventurism would fit nicely into their worldview, it would be the perfect solution to the "supreme court rules for life" thing they are always freaking out about. But it shows they don't really care about making things better, they just want to whine.

  • MaxOS [he/him]
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Kamala getting a lifetime appointment after a catastrophic failure does sound probable

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They never accepted it for what it was when they did remember. Any calls for her to retire were met with accusations of misogyny and ageism and now they've completely enshrined her as a faultless saint.

      • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Remember walking into a lawyer’s office and they actually had one of those wine bottles with her face on it. Memories of those getting mocked on the old subreddit came to me and I fought so hard not to laugh

        • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
          ·
          8 hours ago

          As CTH said, she really was the embodiment of the Democratic Party. She wasn't beloved for striking down any injust law, or furthering human rights. It was for her dissents. In other words, she lost but she seemed so stylish and cool when she lost.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Lawyers are a bizarre breed. They know that their whole edifice is a flimsy fiction, but they cannot know that to do their jobs effectively. Deeply strange people, basically as close as exists to magicians and wizards in the real world.

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This was the same thing that conservatives were saying in 2020. That it would be funny if Trump got impeached, Pence became president, and Pence immediately appointed Trump to the SC.

  • Sickos [they/them, it/its]
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There are much cooler ways to add or replace supreme court justices than retirement.

  • Rom [he/him]
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Did they just forget about McConnell blocking Obama's SC nomination for 11 months after Scalia's death?

    • edge [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Democrats control the senate right now though. They could nominate and confirm a Justice tomorrow if they wanted to (well, if Manchin and Sinema wanted to).

      Despite the argument McConnell made in 2016 (and as proven in 2020), the timing relative to elections doesn't matter. All it takes is the President and 51 senators being willing to do it.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Either yes, or they would suffer in principled silence and lose knowing they had the high ground or something.

  • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]
    ·
    12 hours ago

    How would this be an own? Harris just gave conservatives the presidency and Congress, the SCOTUS balance of powers would remain unchanged and she isn't even that young, so she might need to be replaced like 12 years from now.