Vote.

  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Trump dies, Biden dies, Howie is arrested so that he doesn't get elected, Jo Jorgensen is assassinated with a Katana by an anti-frminist MRA libertarian, Gloria La Riva is sworn in as the first woman and latina president :CommiePOGGERS:

  • MudasirSalmanOTP [she/her,any]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    cast my vote for her in FL, fuck y'all libs 🥰

    edit: I made sure to vote four hundred times btw, might be five but I'll have to check the books on that

    • CommieGirl69 [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      non-american here, isn't florida like a purple state or something? a decisive place where a vote for biden would actually count? if so, i congratulate you for your remarkable non-liberalism comrade :sankara-salute:

  • ned_kelly [he/him]
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 years ago

    For those pushing Greens instead, please learn something from the Australian Greens. They started as an environmental coalition that explicitly included socialists and anarchists. They were less liberal than the American Green Party. Over the years they ate up space, acting as a barrier against socialism by diverting people who would otherwise be radicals. Then when leftists in the party started to grow, the liberals moved to purge them.

    All in all, the Greens have been a detriment to the left. Just a way of funneling would be leftists back in to liberalism with a thin veneer of environmentalism. This is true of other Green parties too.

    The recent case of UK Labour's entrenched liberals sabotaging the party to stop Corbyn has lessons for you here too.

    What those pushing the Greens are suggesting is to give more power to an institution that, despite running a socialist this election, is controlled by liberals and gambling that they'll be able to overcome them eventually in an internal struggle. With no real plan on how to oust those liberals and despite many examples of how this can backfire disastrously. All for a party that has fuck all power of it's own anyway, so the reward is extremely low even if you succeed.

    • posadist [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      You can add the German and the Irish greens there too. Basically every single Green Party that has got more than 5% of the vote has shifted to the centre or centre right.

      • Rev [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        I agree that Greens always slide right over time even when they start off radical but as I wrote in another comment: couldn’t the argument be made that voting for Greens is akin to the John Oliver->Breadtube->Anarchism/Marxism pipeline? Like Green gets the 5% and more exposure, is fucked out of the federal funding and all the fervent Green voting libs can more easily get radicalised into supporting and doing activism for PSL? Just spitballing here, don't know maybe it’s a dumb train of thought…

        • ned_kelly [he/him]
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 years ago

          couldn’t the argument be made that voting for Greens is akin to the John Oliver->Breadtube->Anarchism/Marxism pipeline?

          No. As I have already tried to explain, the result has been exactly the opposite in more favourable situations. The Greens give the illusion that you're breaking out of the politics of the ruling class and thus block the pipeline.

          Like Green gets the 5% and more exposure, is fucked out of the federal funding

          Why do you think you're going to get fucked out of federal funding? The amount is a pittance in the grand scheme of things and it's going to a party that does not challenge the status quo.

  • ChairmanAtreides [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Can we start an official struggle session between voting Howie or La Riva so you guys can decide for me

    • mrbigcheese [he/him]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      I mean do you rather wanna support and organized with the PSL or the Green Party?

      • ChairmanAtreides [he/him]
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        I guess PSL but getting the green party federal funding would be pretty pogchamp

        • mrbigcheese [he/him]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          green party is gonna get like 1.5% lol, also idk what ppl think 5% would even do tbh

          • ChairmanAtreides [he/him]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            the 5% goal would just be haha get owned feds now u have to give money to green party. Probably wont do anything to actually end the two-party system but whatever

            • mrbigcheese [he/him]
              hexagon
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              Are you confused about why I would support the candidate I want to vote for or what lol? I'm not pretending there's some "strategic advantage" or something, idk why you are about the greens tbh. I support and organize with PSL and they've done more than the green party ever has so i'll support their campaign idk how that's controversial. yall libs do whatever who the fuck gets mad over voting lmao

                • mrbigcheese [he/him]
                  hexagon
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  well the green party will get a votes regardless of what people post on chapo.chat so i wouldnt waste hours of my life personally having a struggle session over it, flip a coin how about that lmao

        • mrbigcheese [he/him]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          why do you think the PSL even bothers to run a campaign at all? You think it doesnt matter whether they get 100 votes or 100,000? obviously it helps the org grow otherwise they wouldnt bother putting together these campaigns at all. i mean vote for whoever its not that deep

            • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 years ago

              It literally does. I'd never vote for a fucking eCoSoCiAlisT anyway lmao. Get the fuck out of here with that made up shit

                • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Glad that your anarkkkist sensibilities are more important than potentially boosting a party that's doing real work on the ground and instead are going to throw your vote in libs' faces in a petulant temper tantrum. We all know having our masters hear our anger is more important than feeding the children of unemployed people or fighting slumlords to get rid of mold in poor people's houses. Just think of there heckin fundarinos!

                  Also I'd bet $1000 that within my lifetime we will find out that Murray Bookchin and a bunch of the other """""libertarian socialist""""" philosophers were CIA assets. Especially funny how Marxist-Leninist Abdullah Öcalan converts to Bookchinite DemCon/EcoSoco while in maximum security prison and immediately has his org ally with the US against Assad lmao.

    • MineDayOff [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      It'll never happen too because our chud ass state upped the required signatures to put items on ballots after we got weed passed and now it'll be impossible to get PSL on there (if i'm not mistaken)

  • LeninsRage [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Oh hell fucking yes I actually can write them in and it will count

  • asaharyev [he/him]
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Unfortunately, it looks like I'll have to settle for Howie.

        • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 years ago

          PSL runs in elections but not as electoralists. They use it as a means of exposure and honestly it works. Between 2012 and 2016 they increased their number of votes by 10x and since then their membership has skyrocketed. The number of cadre is exploding since Bernie dropped out and they are taking up the mantle of the US's foremost Communist Party.

            • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 years ago

              Except PSL turned their votes into real on the ground organizing in disadvantaged communities while the Green Party turned their votes into seething liberals.

                • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Millions of people see their name on the ballot without knowing who they are. Then they see a bunch of people voted for them after the election, and a tiny fraction of them look into it and get involved. Even if 10,000 PSL votes translate into one new cadre, it's better than everything the green party has done for the last 20 years.

                  Look at the conversation we are having. It's about Howie vs La Riva for a spot they won't ever win. The fact that it's PSL and not the CPUSA or WWP or SAlt that we are talking about matters. Even if the party will never win an election, having PSL on the ballot and getting votes legitimizes them in a way that other parties can't.

                  I don't give a shit what the green party does. They're just a bunch of crystal healer boomers and conspiracy cranks that lose elections and do literally nothing else. What I want is for Communists and other revolutionary minded socialists to quit their microparties and join PSL and do good work on the ground bringing actual Proles into the ranks and not just PMCs with politics brain

    • mrbigcheese [he/him]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      The Green Party has never done anything except run failed candidates every 4 years why would I vote for a party that's shown to be entirely opportunistic and careerist and not inherently based in any real material working class struggle?

        • mrbigcheese [he/him]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 years ago

          lol and what does it mean for a "green party candidate" to win elections when the party platform is entirely up the air and only now has even been described as socialist in any way? There's not a single green party member in any state or national elected position currently, after the party existing for 20 years. Who is a well known "green party" politician? What has the green party actually done to advance working class struggles? The DSA has only really been active nationally in any serious way over the past 4 years and has already done more and gotten more people into meaningful positions of power than the Green Party.

        • astigmatic [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          to be clear, the green party currently has 130 members holding minor offices, 20 years after their foundation. i kind of doubt they’ve actually had “thousands” of people elected at all but if you have better data that’d be cool to see

      • longhorn617 [any]
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Listening to PSL nerds try to talk down to the Green Party is deeply hilarious. The PSL and the Green Party were founded 3 years apart. The PSL has accomplished fuck all and is on the ballot in 15 states (no one sees your party name if you are a fucking write in), and the Greens have accomplished fuck all and every voter in the country will see their name on the ballot. There is no metric by which the PSL is could be considered more successful.

        I'm not even a fucking Green Party person, some of you online PSL nerds are just that deeply fucking annoying and delusional.

        • mrbigcheese [he/him]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          ah yes the metric by which you're considered successful is whether your name is on the ballot lol. PSL actually organizes poor working class people, something the green party has never cared about. if i go join the green party in NYC right now what sort of organizing and work are they doing here and what have they done during covid and the protests here in the city? Nothing. A non existent party, amazing.

          • longhorn617 [any]
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 years ago

            Which is it, getting on the ballot gets your name out there for more people to see, or getting on the ballot isn't actually important? I can't seem to follow your cope.

            • mrbigcheese [he/him]
              hexagon
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              the PSL has been advocating and fighting for socialism for years and actually furthering the movement in significant and important ways, the greens barely just started even mentioning it, and also explicitly coming out against "state socialism". i couldnt give a fuck about ballots, the greens do fuck all when it comes down to it, so wtf does it matter that they get these votes if it never translated into anything more than a sparing campaign for climate advocacy? shit Sunrise just got founded and they already blew the fucking Greens out of relevancy in that field.

              • longhorn617 [any]
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                4 years ago

                "I couldn't give a fuck about the ballots, that's why I made this post about the PSL being on the ballot."

                • mrbigcheese [he/him]
                  hexagon
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  i dont give a fuck about the ballots in terms of using that as the metric to an org being successful or not. "There is no metric by which the PSL is could be considered more successful." 🙄

        • coolfuzzylemur [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Actually Greens are missing from a lot of ballots this year. Wisconsin and Pennsylvania aren't the only ones. They just didn't bother to collect signatures

          • longhorn617 [any]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            I'm referencing more that you can usually find a Green candidate on the ballot in every state, and not necessarily the presidential election.

        • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Again, people voting for La Riva objectively helps PSL get bigger. I understand that you're more invested in making a scene for the libs in hopes that they will notice you, but personally I don't think that will ever lead to anything.

          • BigPoopPalls [any]
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 years ago

            If you think the PSL wants to be a larger party, you don't know much about the PSL. It takes years and countless people vouching for you to become a member.

            • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I know members and am considering joining myself. It takes about 6 months to become a member, and that's right now when they're flooded with applications. They 100% want to get bigger, but without compromising the quality of cadres. They don't need to have 5,000,000 members, because most membersr in most parties don't do anything. PSL wants to get as many dedicated Marxist-Leninists as possible.

  • REallyN [she/her,they/them]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    I don't understand why write-in is qualified, isn't the point you can just write whatever in?