I don't follow the American national anthem lyrics, I just googled them for the tag line and wtf.
Edit: oh its about some battle according to my bf
because killing everyone you disagree with will fix your life?
guarantee you this person advocated for glassing the middle east in the early 2000s
I'd put money on it. Like a decent amount. 100% this guy was a "muslamists aren't compatible with our values" ghoul and still probably is. It's cos the ceo was white he's blates mad.
Who wants to bet he’s advocated for the funny rope day at least once?
To me “glassing” someone means hitting them over the head with a pint glass. What’s it mean in the context you’ve posted?
Okay but now imagine if everyone in England nuked eachother when they got drunk, instead of beating each other with glass
I don't really mean anything, I was just amused by the idea of the english meaning of "glassing" being the same as the military meaning, but nothing else being changed. There's no depth to it, I just found myself chuckling at the image of some old geezer going "oi mate!" and then just...
over a disagreement about when tottenham was most shitActually that has me giggling. I’ve never seen anyone get glassed, though. I’ve heard numerous stories though, probably mostly bollocks, cause that’s what people do. Bet they’re all based on this scene.
Nuking a place, especially a desert will create lots of glass from the heat. So "glassing" a place is slang for nuking it, or just bombing it so hard nothing remains.
in this context it means a bunch of nuclear strikes, which in the American imagination would turn all of the sand there to glass
Phrasing this as some kind of trivial disagreement is an extension of politics in the US being totally disconnected from the material conditions and lives of most everyday people. They literally can't comprehend the idea that executives should be held accountable for the death and destruction their companies leave behind
Motherfuckers saying "diagreements" like this guy got killed over his pizza topping or ice cream preferences or something.
I wonder if there's Americans who have seen the response to this guys death and been like "wait maybe I'm wrong here?"
It's a joke from the movie Airplane.
"Surely you can't be serious?"
"I am serious. And don't call me Shirley"
Probs said “we might disagree about who we voted for but we can still be friends”, or something, which is a load of bollocks.
That’s always absurd because they never shut up about how they want anyone to disagrees with them to die. Hell, some of their “disagreements with me” is that I disagree with the notion white men should decide who gets to live or die based on whether or not they find someone’s existence annoying.
Come to think of it, why are they claiming to be ok with having friendships with people they also claim they want nothing to do with?
It is a systemic problem to be sure, but that doesn't mean that enriching yourself through the extreme imisseration of others is somehow morally neutral. Like that american who went to Palestine, stole land and defended himself with "If I didn't steal it someone else would".
When your entire economic system is based on extreme inequality it makes sense that this is a line of thinking that would be both spread and adapted. I don't have to question why child workers are manufacturing my goods under extremely poor and dangerous conditions, it is just how the world is.
They're always vague like that, because if they said "Kill people just because they think they should be allowed to choose to withhold life-saving treatments just to line their own pockets", then it would sound absolutely justified.
The founding fathers used to duel to the death people for much less.
We nearly had musk v Elon in mma. It's so unfair. I despise them both but I'd love watching the lizard man beat the crap out of him in the ring.
Old school proper duel with flintlock pistols and it's a total tie with both landing lucky shots on each other, 2 shitbirds 1 stone.
Nooo staaahhppp I don't want to dream!!!
What if zuck won the duel but was injured and as he walked to like go get treatment and his trophy someone just goes "sorry Mr zuck but your skibidi" and the film ends as the bullet takes out zuck and we get cringe 2010 dude action movie expendebles style ending credits with nu-metal kicking in and explosions bskslfkekeldleldlelr that's an explosion sound
I know in my heart that Zuck would have won that fight and it wouldn't have been close. If you look at his competition footage and his stuff with Lex Friedman you'll see him kind of fumbling around, but he's within the 1 standard deviation of a white belt. (Looking back on them with my last year of progress, I see the INSANE foot sweeps he could have hit if he knew they were there). He doesn't get flustered when the rubber meets the road and he is able to execute a game plan. He can do SOMETHING which is more than enough to stop Dr. Eggman.
I think he low diffs if not no diffs
Nooo so did I fr but from "I wanted it to happen" vs a "i actually know what I'm talking about" place lmao.
So like translate for me, you think zuck would of won?
Only if there is enough special effects and jingoistic plot points in the movie.
Optimus Prime is a colonizer and Michael Bay did that on purpose I won't believe anything else
Isn't there a scene in the marky mark dinosaur transforms where this dude over 18 has a minor gf and whips out some card that says its legally okay for them to date or something nuts like that? Not a serious and healthy folk franchise.
If I recall correctly, the Hamilton-Burr rivalry started with a disagreement over federal banking and how currency should be minted.
Craven apologist boot-people always boil down life and death exploitation to "a disagreement". To quote from someone here: "Fuck you, I wish your entire ideological cohort had been more thoroughly disagreed with in World Disagreement II"
wreck people with one simple response when they chastise you for violent rhetoric:
"im not a pacifist and neither are you"
And if they insist they are a pacifist, you can just slap 'em around a bunch and if they defend themselves you can call them a hypocrite.
i always respond with "oh so you support abolishing the military and police, too?"
if they dont i tell them its not pacifism to demand others do violence on your behalf, it's cowardice
Yeah, that's a good one. They're only "pacifists" because they are personally unaffected by the violence of the system.
It might not fix my life completely, but it would improve it measurably
That's a level of graphic violence people need to consent to lmao.
Hippos be crazy!! Lmao
I was literally saying this to someone yesterday, that even though this technically doesn't improve my life in any way, living in a world where this can happen feels like cracking the window after fifteen hours in a boiling car. It makes the moment-to-moment experience of living a little more comfortable, and that's something that really does improve my life.
Live like a vulture, die like a dog.
Misery loves company and if I knew the person responsible for my misery was miserable too, then my misery would be less miserable
yeah he just "Disagrees" . with the right to life ..
It's such a fucking silly comeback, like my dude did you think this was deep or well thought out? This is Ben shapiro levels of rebuttal. 0/10 lmao bad lib.
uncritical support to americans killing each other until the continent turns into a nature preserve
We simply had a disagreement whether this cancer treatment should be covered under the insurance policy I am paying for.
because killing everyone you disagree with will fix your life?
[x] yes chad.jpeg
Depends on where you draw the line on level of disagreement really. Which issues do we disagree on? If it’s “The poor should die” yes actually killing everyone who disagrees with me would improve things dramatically
Okay so I get this reference now I think, my bf said apparently the anthem references a battle for some fort and it was the first warfare to ever use rockets as a weapon and the British General who used them got them after seeing them used by the Chinese?
Those guys are funded by an oil heiress. They aren't there to protest climate change, they are there to make climate change protestors look bad so people don't support them.
Funny to reduce "denies healthcare" to just being a disagreement. The CEO just disagreed with the killer about how much air he should be breathing, I don't get why the NYCP are so set on finding him. Do these people just want to lock away everyone who disagrees with them?
thank you lol
anyone who doesn't validate me all the time gets the crab stab
