I don't follow the American national anthem lyrics, I just googled them for the tag line and wtf.
Edit: oh its about some battle according to my bf
because killing everyone you disagree with will fix your life?
guarantee you this person advocated for glassing the middle east in the early 2000s
I'd put money on it. Like a decent amount. 100% this guy was a "muslamists aren't compatible with our values" ghoul and still probably is. It's cos the ceo was white he's blates mad.
Who wants to bet he’s advocated for the funny rope day at least once?
To me “glassing” someone means hitting them over the head with a pint glass. What’s it mean in the context you’ve posted?
Okay but now imagine if everyone in England nuked eachother when they got drunk, instead of beating each other with glass
I don't really mean anything, I was just amused by the idea of the english meaning of "glassing" being the same as the military meaning, but nothing else being changed. There's no depth to it, I just found myself chuckling at the image of some old geezer going "oi mate!" and then just...
over a disagreement about when tottenham was most shitActually that has me giggling. I’ve never seen anyone get glassed, though. I’ve heard numerous stories though, probably mostly bollocks, cause that’s what people do. Bet they’re all based on this scene.
Lmao I knew it would be the trainspotting scene. Yeah glassing someone in reality would be psycho behaviour, breaking a pint glass over someones head could easily kill them. It's always someones friends mates cousin who's done it
Used to work with a lad who told me on New Years Eve multiple bottles got broken over his head, but he knew he was going to be alright cause the bottles were breaking.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Nuking a place, especially a desert will create lots of glass from the heat. So "glassing" a place is slang for nuking it, or just bombing it so hard nothing remains.
in this context it means a bunch of nuclear strikes, which in the American imagination would turn all of the sand there to glass
Phrasing this as some kind of trivial disagreement is an extension of politics in the US being totally disconnected from the material conditions and lives of most everyday people. They literally can't comprehend the idea that executives should be held accountable for the death and destruction their companies leave behind
Motherfuckers saying "diagreements" like this guy got killed over his pizza topping or ice cream preferences or something.
I wonder if there's Americans who have seen the response to this guys death and been like "wait maybe I'm wrong here?"
It's a joke from the movie Airplane.
"Surely you can't be serious?"
"I am serious. And don't call me Shirley"
Jive ass dude ain't got no brains anyhow
(My bf is showing me all the clips and gags now since I've never seen the whole movie)
Probs said “we might disagree about who we voted for but we can still be friends”, or something, which is a load of bollocks.
That’s always absurd because they never shut up about how they want anyone to disagrees with them to die. Hell, some of their “disagreements with me” is that I disagree with the notion white men should decide who gets to live or die based on whether or not they find someone’s existence annoying.
Come to think of it, why are they claiming to be ok with having friendships with people they also claim they want nothing to do with?
It is a systemic problem to be sure, but that doesn't mean that enriching yourself through the extreme imisseration of others is somehow morally neutral. Like that american who went to Palestine, stole land and defended himself with "If I didn't steal it someone else would".
When your entire economic system is based on extreme inequality it makes sense that this is a line of thinking that would be both spread and adapted. I don't have to question why child workers are manufacturing my goods under extremely poor and dangerous conditions, it is just how the world is.
They're always vague like that, because if they said "Kill people just because they think they should be allowed to choose to withhold life-saving treatments just to line their own pockets", then it would sound absolutely justified.
The founding fathers used to duel to the death people for much less.
We nearly had musk v Elon in mma. It's so unfair. I despise them both but I'd love watching the lizard man beat the crap out of him in the ring.
Old school proper duel with flintlock pistols and it's a total tie with both landing lucky shots on each other, 2 shitbirds 1 stone.
Nooo staaahhppp I don't want to dream!!!
What if zuck won the duel but was injured and as he walked to like go get treatment and his trophy someone just goes "sorry Mr zuck but your skibidi" and the film ends as the bullet takes out zuck and we get cringe 2010 dude action movie expendebles style ending credits with nu-metal kicking in and explosions bskslfkekeldleldlelr that's an explosion sound
I know in my heart that Zuck would have won that fight and it wouldn't have been close. If you look at his competition footage and his stuff with Lex Friedman you'll see him kind of fumbling around, but he's within the 1 standard deviation of a white belt. (Looking back on them with my last year of progress, I see the INSANE foot sweeps he could have hit if he knew they were there). He doesn't get flustered when the rubber meets the road and he is able to execute a game plan. He can do SOMETHING which is more than enough to stop Dr. Eggman.
I think he low diffs if not no diffs
Nooo so did I fr but from "I wanted it to happen" vs a "i actually know what I'm talking about" place lmao.
So like translate for me, you think zuck would of won?
So Zuck practices/practiced BJJ. I have a brown belt in BJJ and with experience coaching competitors and classes, so I feel qualified to analyze white belts. You can see some competition footage of him as well as a roll with Lex Friedman who, say what you will about him, is a BJJ black belt[1][2]. In his no gi competition he gets some real resistance even in the stand up right at the very beginning. Then you see him defend submission attempts and, though sloppy, he manages to figure out how to pass the guard. If you combine that with his footage with Lex Friedman, you can see him doing honest to god BJJ. This is significant because there are celebrities who will train BJJ who don't get "real" looking BJJ - which is to say that it looks as if their practice does not include resistance[3]. Distilling its history as distinct from Judo, BJJ, the collection of martial techniques, prides itself on the effectiveness of its techniques against resisting opponents, so "unreal" BJJ is the subject of ire. Celebrities will often times get private lessons (with prestigious coaches) so they don't risk getting injured by the general public and putting some movie shoot, and all the employees working on it, on delay. So it's cool when Lex Friedman puts Zuck in real dilemmas and you see Zuck think through it with techniques that make you go
.Musk, on the other hand, name drops a bunch of different martial arts he tried as a child[4]. It arouses my ire even before you give them the 9999 billionaire hate-coefficient. It's like your uncle who used to bench 4 plates. It's the kind of thing I grin and walk away from IRL. This man would have pointed to his competition experience if he had any. He is 51 years old and wears it. Not like it's a problem until he's walking around telling people you'd beat a practicing martial artist in martial arts. Steven Hawking's oil paintings wouldn't be subject to harsh critique unless he goes around bashing the cis teens who painted the chapel.
To round it all out: Zuck wouldn't have had to take an asprin after taking
off balance and climbing on top of him on the floor. There's always a market for "the striker vs the grappler" fights. But in those kinds of fights the data bares out that the grappler has the edge. In the UFC, the most prestigious league, a base of wrestling makes more champions than any other base (they, however, must be great in every dimension to be the best anymore). So even given Musk has an equivalent amount of experience in kyokushin, the most MMA relevant art he listed, and comparable athleticism then he's still at a disadvantage. But in every way he's not a real rival for Zuck's white belt BJJ. It's smoke and mirrors. Zuck might as well bring a dog collar into the ring and try and put it around Musk's neck. He should bring a book in case he gets bored fighting Musk.[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6GC3p4jH0
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Wy-6z17up4
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFeaa8nIOgY
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPRah0RJTs8
Im pretty good at BJs myself as well actuallly 💅 lmao
Okay so I think I followed 🥰
So Zuck is actually really good at grappling and it's not just for show to the point people trained and well read can be like holy shit
Musk is a lying hack who lists a load of stuff he did as a middle age crisis or as a kid and thinks being tall, big and pretending he can throw a bunch will somehow rival actual skill and technique someone seriously nurtured.
That it?
I wouldn't go so far as to say he's good. When it comes to white belts, you don't exactly bring your A-game against them. You have to play around with them, try your silliest moves, and control the pace. If you watch Lex fight him, you might see that Zuck can only work techniques because Lex gives him some space to try. The thing is that Zuck is showing the kind of competency you can expect of a white belt in general. He's not fighting like a celebrity, he's part of the crew, part of the ship. And I think you can expect a BJJ practitioner, in general, to beat the divorced as a state of mind Elon Musk in a 1 on 1.
Besides that, yeah, you're exactly right. At the end of the day, grappling, while being very human and ubiquitous with every culture ever, is very funny. If you want to watch a really funny fight (or at least the theatrics around it), might I suggest Craig Jones vs Gabi Garcia (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HID-Xi8hOUw). It's only kind of problematic because Craig's whole mission was to get women athletes paid.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
I found YouTube links in your comment. Here are links to the same videos on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Link 1:
Link 2:
Link 3:
Link 4:
Only if there is enough special effects and jingoistic plot points in the movie.
Optimus Prime is a colonizer and Michael Bay did that on purpose I won't believe anything else
Isn't there a scene in the marky mark dinosaur transforms where this dude over 18 has a minor gf and whips out some card that says its legally okay for them to date or something nuts like that? Not a serious and healthy folk franchise.
Probably, I haven't perceived a transformer sober since '11
https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/236102/why-is-there-a-scene-about-the-age-of-consent-in-transformers-age-of-extinctio#236105
Aaaaaaaaaaa I can't believe it's as bad as I was told omfg 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Lmao how do you know they are even real then? I could be gaslighting you right now
Mirrors are sexist and they will be required to self crit under my new regime and only present flattering and fair reflections back. This will make up some of their crimes.
If I recall correctly, the Hamilton-Burr rivalry started with a disagreement over federal banking and how currency should be minted.
Craven apologist boot-people always boil down life and death exploitation to "a disagreement". To quote from someone here: "Fuck you, I wish your entire ideological cohort had been more thoroughly disagreed with in World Disagreement II"
wreck people with one simple response when they chastise you for violent rhetoric:
"im not a pacifist and neither are you"
And if they insist they are a pacifist, you can just slap 'em around a bunch and if they defend themselves you can call them a hypocrite.
i always respond with "oh so you support abolishing the military and police, too?"
if they dont i tell them its not pacifism to demand others do violence on your behalf, it's cowardice
Yeah, that's a good one. They're only "pacifists" because they are personally unaffected by the violence of the system.
yeah he just "Disagrees" . with the right to life ..
It's such a fucking silly comeback, like my dude did you think this was deep or well thought out? This is Ben shapiro levels of rebuttal. 0/10 lmao bad lib.
It might not fix my life completely, but it would improve it measurably
That's a level of graphic violence people need to consent to lmao.
Hippos be crazy!! Lmao
I was literally saying this to someone yesterday, that even though this technically doesn't improve my life in any way, living in a world where this can happen feels like cracking the window after fifteen hours in a boiling car. It makes the moment-to-moment experience of living a little more comfortable, and that's something that really does improve my life.
Live like a vulture, die like a dog.
Misery loves company and if I knew the person responsible for my misery was miserable too, then my misery would be less miserable
uncritical support to americans killing each other until the continent turns into a nature preserve
We simply had a disagreement whether this cancer treatment should be covered under the insurance policy I am paying for.
because killing everyone you disagree with will fix your life?
[x] yes chad.jpeg
Depends on where you draw the line on level of disagreement really. Which issues do we disagree on? If it’s “The poor should die” yes actually killing everyone who disagrees with me would improve things dramatically
Okay so I get this reference now I think, my bf said apparently the anthem references a battle for some fort and it was the first warfare to ever use rockets as a weapon and the British General who used them got them after seeing them used by the Chinese?
because killing everyone you disagree with will fix your life?
i mean
Funny to reduce "denies healthcare" to just being a disagreement. The CEO just disagreed with the killer about how much air he should be breathing, I don't get why the NYCP are so set on finding him. Do these people just want to lock away everyone who disagrees with them?
Those guys are funded by an oil heiress. They aren't there to protest climate change, they are there to make climate change protestors look bad so people don't support them.
aye aye captain
thank you lol
anyone who doesn't validate me all the time gets the crab stab
