Hi comrades, want to give you all an informal update on the discussions around the site's misogyny problems that've been happening over the last several days. I wanna make sure you know that the admin/mod team has seen all of that discourse and we've been actively discussing solutions in the matrix mod chat. We're taking this shit very seriously and acknowledge that we haven't used a heavy enough hand on misogynistic rhetoric. As some of you saw we nuked that cheating thread from a couple weeks ago and handed out temp bans to the most egregious offenders. Idk how that was allowed to run it's course but we apologize for that oversight. We're going to do better.

We've come up with some ideas for how to improve this part of the site culture and we want to get suggestions from y'all as well, since the alarm was sounded on this by our beautiful c/traa posters to begin with. Our ideas so far include:

  1. A zero-tolerance policy towards any even remotely misogynistic/patriarchal posts or comments, as too much has slipped through the cracks on that, establishing a clear protocol for bans for violating rules against misogyny, and ideally tracking repeat offenders in a way that makes deciding a course of action easy when they reoffend.

  2. Uphold TC69 thought by starting up a book club (and hopefully more to follow) on feminist theory and encouraging mass participation, particularly from the he/him's on the site. "The Will to Change" by bell hooks has been suggested by multiple people as a great starting point but please feel free to suggest any other works.

  3. Relaunching /c/menby with a trusted educated mod team and a specific focus on countering mainstream narratives about masculinity, relationships and sex that breed reactionary, patriarchal attitudes

  4. Encouraging [namely femme] participation in /c/womenby and taking steps to revitalize that sub as an excellent source of discussion on feminism and intersectionality

  5. Holding another mod drive to get more folks into mod positions in our communities who can help weed out reactionary attitudes

  6. Encouraging users to use the report button often on any post that seems even remotely sus, with the promise that no one's going to be punished for "report abuse" for reporting posts in obvious good faith

Please let me know your thoughts on the above or any other ideas you have for making the site better, safer and more inclusive for our femme comrades. Once we've fully hammered out plans and updated policy we plan to make an announcement post highlighting these changes for the whole userbase. Thank you all for being here and being who you are feminism trans-heart

  • Ivysaur [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    This is good! I have some thoughts about the wo/menby split which have also been brought up by other nonbinary people in this thread, so I will leave them to speak on that. I only hope we can eventually address other blind spots with similar urgency in what I consider to be one of the only tolerable forums left on the English-speaking net; covid minimization outside of the comm for it is one that particularly infuriates me, overall ableism that is not to do with neurodivergence is another -- but this is one necessary step of many, and I'm happy to see it.

  • فریدون حسینی@vegantheoryclub.org
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Wow. I saw that thread and was like what the fuck! I couldn’t believe people were agreeing with op I didn’t bother to participate and have been busy. Glad this is moving towards something more productive.

  • belligerentkitten [they/them, it/its]
    ·
    6 hours ago

    i've seen several comments on this thread to the effect of "pls explain to me why the cheating thread was bad so i can self crit"

    and i have misgivings about this. this is not the place for it. i'm glad they're open to reconsidering their perspective and the poorly named comm for deconstructing this shit has been resurrected and that's probably a good place to start. but reopening it in the post about the misogyny purge just kinda derails the actual discussion and expects the people misgyny is directed at to do all the work of educating them.

  • aen [he/him]
    ·
    6 hours ago

    no idea what happened but i'm glad you're taking action, it sounds like something absolutely cringe was posted. i really need to read that book at some point

    • anaesidemus [he/him]
      ·
      5 hours ago

      yes, hadn't thought about it that way but it's been thoroughly taken out of context as a meme. The "funny" is the clash of the subject matter and the webcomic format.

      We then forget the actual people who go through this experience, i'm not sure if a CW would be enough if we would continue using the meme

      • mathemachristian [he/him]
        ·
        4 hours ago

        i'm not sure if a CW would be enough if we would continue using the meme

        I'm sure it wouldn't. CW's apply when discussing problematic content. Problematic content shouldn't be the subject matter of the joke. It would also exclude people from social participation.

      • sneak100 [she/her]
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We then forget the actual people who go through this experience

        Who's the "we" in this sentence? OP clearly didn't forget, hence why they brought it up just now. Strange way to downplay that

        • anaesidemus [he/him]
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I meant we who continue using the meme without thinking of what it actually makes fun of, I will not be part of that group going forward

      • mathemachristian [he/him]
        ·
        1 minute ago

        How is this not a perma-ban? This person is making the exact miscarriage joke as a response to someone who doesn't want to see it, directly next to it a comment talking about how this exact joke triggers trauma??

    • Anvil_Lavigne [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      7 hours ago

      spooky, i just remembered it exists & was wondering what the stance would be on it now. i mean, it's a tagline here, correct?

  • SoyViking [he/him]
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Thanks to the mods for taking the problem serious and doing something about it! Thanks to those who pointed out the issue in the first place!

    Let's make Hexbear a safe and inclusive space for everyone.

    • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
      ·
      6 hours ago
      1. The OP had limited information, all he knew was that the lady he was seeing was evidently married.

      2. The proper channel is one-on-one, to talk to the person you've been seeing and challenge them to come clean. Going to whoever they've been dating doesn't give them the chance to explain themselves or make amends.

      3. There's a chance that the lady had a good reason for secrecy, perhaps that she was in the process of trying to dissolve the relationship in the first place.

      4. "Hey I thought you should know I fucked your wife" is one of the more dangerous things you can say to a man.

      5. Just getting up and telling the guy would likely put the lady in danger of being harmed.

      OP was justified in feeling deceived and uneasy about the hookup. But like so many other situations, there's a tact to be had: blurting out something to a stranger and showing all your cards is rarely the best way to go about things. It seemed like people who considered it agreed that the choice of action was a little rash.

  • Yukiko [she/her]
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Good list of action. Number 1 needs to be adopted sitewide.

  • Mindfury [he/him]
    ·
    10 hours ago

    again, the only time "australia" stays winning is when we completely miss what sounds like some absolutely atrocious posting

    all these points sound pretty good and more than fair. any cis dudes (which I am) taking issue with this or any similar actions, and anyone who receives a mere temp ban over these rules and gets mad instead of taking time to self-crit, should probably fucking heem themselves