• hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Which matters more: AOC telling some troops they can have snacks, or AOC saying she's against interventions on principle and against intervention in Venezuela specifically?

        spoiler

        You're correct! Neither really matters, and AOC has about as much real power over U.S. foreign policy as you or me.

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Especially that I can totally see Ilhan or Bernie who gave anti-imperlialist credentials get upset over this. It's edgy to hate the troops, but come on.

  • redthebaron [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    come on the one funny bit on the american constitution is that if the soldiers can't find places they have to stay like that give us that at least

    • AdamSandler [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      15 days before, these soldiers gunned down a woman for daring to criticize the election.

      • ExceedsTheCharacterL [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Your stupid ass is defending that QAnon Chud? I have never cared less about a police shooting victim in my life. And that wasn’t the National guard idiot

        • AdamSandler [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          4 years ago

          Doesn’t make the cops (not the troops, I was wrong about that part) who shot her in cold blood just.

          • johnbrown1917 [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            And it also does not mean they shot her for critizing the election.

            Im not going to lose sleep over this when they far worse to far less deserving poeple

            • AdamSandler [he/him]
              hexagon
              ·
              4 years ago

              Then why else would they have opened fire on an unarmed woman?

              • Huldra [they/them, it/its]
                ·
                4 years ago

                In this situation theres an easy excuse, people in the protest had guns and they could easily assume she had one too and was trying to get in to hurt people.

                Like yeah thats a bog standard excuse but its realistic enough that hammering on this point isnt doing what you think its doing.

                • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  There's even a video of this shooting. A bunch of chuds are trying to break through a closed door/window barrier in a hallway, and when they start making some progress you see someone on the other side point a gun and turn her into a good fascist.

              • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
                ·
                4 years ago

                Why would capitol police fire on people breaking through a barricade when they're protecting the vice president and congress people in the office behind them? I mean come on dude. I'm not saying they're in the right, but it wasn't the "criticism" that got her shot.

      • FloridaBoi [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        no they didn't. that was capitol police and that crowd killed one of theirs too. what is even the point of this post?

        • AdamSandler [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          4 years ago

          What was she doing that warranted the death penalty without trial?

          • Moosegender [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            She was trying to kill congressmen and women you fucking far right sleeper agent. Go back to stupidpol or some other fashy space.

            • AdamSandler [he/him]
              hexagon
              ·
              4 years ago

              I’m not going to feel any sympathy towards congresspeople.

              • Moosegender [he/him]
                ·
                4 years ago

                Of course you don’t you fucking loon. You think I’m gonna cheer fascists killing AOC, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tliab? Fuck you.

                • AdamSandler [he/him]
                  hexagon
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  AOC supported the fascist Bolivian regime. Stop running defense for congress holy shit

        • JayTwo [any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          When I first saw the comment, it was at 15 upbears, and now it's at 8.

          So, nearly half of those upbearing it, realized what he was actually referencing, then went back and unbeared it.

          LAWLZ

      • JayTwo [any]
        ·
        4 years ago

        From now on, I'm gonna use "criticize" as the new "parody" so thank you for that.

    • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      If the military lib takes continue, someone is gonna have to post the comic about the soldier killing a kids parents and him telling the kid it wasnt his fault

      • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Honestly, you are just as bad as a lib. You want to lazily blame a target to make yourself feel better.

        Who, exactly, is excusing such behavior?

            • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              You arent even part of the international proletariat, you are labor aristocracy that currently defending the class traitors know as the US military

              • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                4 years ago

                I nearly died, unemployed, because of the American healthcare system. My lifespan is limited because I was born working class.

                I earn my living now, by selling my labor. And definitely not in the military. I own no capital.

                Fuck you. I stand with my brothers and sisters in the working class they sell their labor in the military or not.

    • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      “All troops are forever irredeemable” is a bad take, as is "troops are basically the same as cops." Troops aren't good, and we should be automatically skeptical of them, but there are real differences.

      For troops, the most powerful military on earth uses the most powerful propaganda machine on earth to target kids who are barely shaving for recruitment. That kid has zero firsthand experience with the reality of the imperial war machine, and if they try to quit once they’re in they can get a black mark next to their name that will impede their ability to get housing, education, and employment for the rest of their life. We can’t hold a kid 100% responsible – with no possibility of forgiveness at any point – for their decision under these conditions. That’s totally inconsistent with how leftists should think about culpability and rehabilitation in any other scenario.

      Compare this to cops, who generally sign up for pig school in their 20s, who live under the realities of American policing every day, and who can quit at any time with no real repercussions.

      • Nuttula [comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        “All troops are forever irredeemable” is a bad take,

        Pretty sure only we privileged westerners who have to opportunity to have this "debate" may think this and not the Afghan child that saw their family get blown up by a drone, they certainly wouldn't give a fuck if that US soldier is a doctor, some bureaucratic pencil pusher down the chain of command or the war criminal that piloted the drone.

        • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Read the rest of the comment, though. In no other context would leftists find it acceptable to write someone off for the rest of their life, especially if there are significant mitigating circumstances, and even if they were only tangentially linked to direct harm (e.g., some pencil pusher who's spent his entire career at a base in Kansas).

          Imagine some 17-year-old was pressured into joining a gang. He just sells drugs, but other members of his gang kill people. If he thinks he's in over his head and tries to leave the gang, they're going to make life pretty hard for him. Should our 17-year-old drug dealer be put to death? Should he be imprisoned for life? Or should we consider the circumstances of how he got in the gang in the first place, and how easy it would have been for him to leave, and what he personally did, and have some avenue for him to redeem himself?

    • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I will have you know that I only bend over backwards to yell a single thing at a time.

      And right now (bends backwards) it's that it is January 27, 2021, and Joe Biden is still a rapist.

      Now, allow me to bend backwards a second, distinctly separate time: directing your blame and hatred towards individual cops or service members for crimes committed by other individuals, and due to systemic issues caused by capitalism, is stupid, counterproductive, and fractures solidarity of the working class.

      This literally excuses nothing.

      Thank you for your patience as I bent over two, distinctly separate times.

  • 7DeadlyFetishes [he/him,comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    War criminals

    National Guardsmen

    Fellas I don't think OP knows what the fuck he's talking about. (also the National Guard is arguable the least chud of the all the military jobs, fuck the OP for being a joyless communist who thinks AOC must always be the offensive because that's good politics apparently.)

    -7DeadlyFetishes

    • AdamSandler [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      The national guard was firing tear gas and canister at protestors during the summer, bud.

      • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Guard and Reserve units made up about 45 percent of the total force sent to Iraq and Afghanistan, and received about 18.4 percent of the casualties.

        Jesus Christ that's even worse than I thought. 45% of the total force? That's almost half.

        • gammison [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          It's because the actual army is so small. In that situation the guard can be called to act as a support arm of army which happens because everyone knows the army sucks ass and won't join it. This was routine in the 19th century (though national guard were only called such in NY, it became the national name for state militia in 1903 and officially became mixed state and federal reserve forces in 1933) when the professional US army was small. They basically get called in by the army to be infantry fodder and logistics.

    • T_Doug [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Love our non-chud troops

      When the infantry units from the Florida National Guard arrived at the Assad airbase north-west of Baghdad in early May last year, they discovered they were to run a makeshift prison camp where detainees were confined in a vast aircraft hangar, with cells marked off with concertina wire.

      Prisoners wore hoods made out of sacking used for sandbags. The Guard units were ordered to keep those suspected of being combatants awake for future interrogation, and instructed in techniques of sleep deprivation by three interrogators.

      The interrogators were not in regular army uniform, and the soldiers never learned their real names.

      "We had a sledgehammer that we would bang against the wall, and that would create an echo that sounds like an explosion that scared the hell out of them," said Camilo Mejia, a member of the Florida National Guard who has applied to the Pentagon for status as a conscientious objector.

      "If that didn't work we would load a 9mm pistol, and pretend to be charging it near their head, and make them think we were going to shoot them. Once you did that, they did whatever you wanted them to do basically."

      In a statement, written to support his conscientious objector application, Sgt Mejia writes that a platoon leader objected to their new duties, only to be told that his stand could end his military career.

      next look up "ramadi madness"

  • ExceedsTheCharacterL [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    This is a fucking stupid. They’re the national guard...what war crimes? Most of their job is sitting around. This is what’s known as...being a nice person. You all sound like that dipshit Jimmy Dore

  • SoyViking [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    They're is something dysfunctional about an empire who can't even accommodate is own troops in its own capital protecting its own elite.

  • pepe_silvia96 [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    as someone else has suggested...

    let aocPosts = getAocPosts()

    if (isEven(aocPosts.length)) {

    chapoBanner = 'aoc bad'

    } else {

    chapoBanner = 'aoc good'

    }

      • neebay [any,undecided]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        let's call communism communism instead

        I do not think populism is a useful term for understanding a political position, as it seems more to describe aesthetic presentation rather than what kind of policy is actually being advocated for

        that you switched so effortlessly between applying it to Trump's most fervent supporters and applying it to communism demonstrates this lack of meaning

        Trump is populist, Maduro is populist, Modi is populist, Mao was populist, Julius Caesar was populist, so many totally different things are labeled as populist that attacking or defending something on the grounds that it is populist is weak as hell

        I'm not saying "populism bad" or "populism good", and that's because I don't see the point in taking either side of that argument

  • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Military service members are an exploited part of the proletariat, fuck you and everyone else in this thread that wants to sow even more division amongst the working class.

    • CyborgMarx [any, any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      The military isn't part of the proletariat unless a draft is instituted, this is basic shit, like come on

      • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        It is basic shit. Their relationship to the means of production is the same as a factory worker's or an office clerk: they sell their time, their labor for compensation. They work for the interests of the capitalist class.

        • CyborgMarx [any, any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          WTF are you talking about, they have no relations to the means of production, they're completely insulated by the state, physically, psychologically and financially, they're sole purpose is to enforce the capitalist state's monopoly of violence, that is not the function of the working class

          Subjugating the global working class is not a fuckin form of labor

          • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            4 years ago

            They absolutely do. Their labor fuels the military industrial complex.

            Psychologically and financially insulated? Tell that to homeless vets. That's a joke.

            • CyborgMarx [any, any]
              ·
              4 years ago

              THEY DO NOT PERFORM ECONOMIC LABOR, do you think solders are the ones building the tanks, the planes, the guns? They are a drain, literal weapons of the state, they're function is to kill and enforce, there is no relation here with the working class other than thru cultural affectation or like I said a mass draft which isn't the case in the United States

              Psychologically and financially insulated? Tell that to homeless vets

              We're not talking about homeless vets

              • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                4 years ago

                If soldiers are so insulated, how do homeless vets exist, exactly? We absolutely are talking about vets, there is no decoupling of the subject.

                Whether it's manning a ship, defending a border, or taking an oilfield, it has a huge, tangible economic impact. It is a form of labor, the labor that the military industrial complex fundamentally subsists off of. Without that labor, there can be no military industrial complex.

                Just because some of the labor is mind bogglingly awful, does not make it not labor.

                • CyborgMarx [any, any]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  If soldiers are so insulated, how do homeless vets exist, exactly?

                  Because they're no longer insulated once they're cut loose, this isn't rocket science

                  there is no decoupling of the subject.

                  lol there absolutely is because the state does it for us

                  Whether it’s manning a ship, defending a border, or taking an oilfield, it has a huge, tangible economic impact

                  Economic IMPACT is not the same thing as economic output or maintenance, you're confusing concepts and terms, whether soldiers perform a FORM of labor is irreverent, with no relations to the means of production they cannot be working class, by your universal definition of labor every human on the planet is a member of the "working class", you're talking nonsense

                  And the military industrial complex doesn't subsist on the labor of soldiers, it subsists on our tax dollars

            • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Alright you've played your hand at this point. Calling the bluff, this is a bit

              • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                4 years ago

                Haha I'm afraid it totally isn't!

                I do non-ironically appreciate the indignant responses because they have me thinking more deeply about what "class" is.

                Don't get me wrong, I believe in an ideal world there would be no military, no police.

                I support "defunding" the police, and withdrawing our troops from abroad.

                But I don't believe in demonizing the individuals. Nor do I think having a military or a police force is intrinsically wrong.

                And yeah, I'm sympathetic towards the ACAB sentiment since I've never once had a positive experience with cops. Mostly scared of getting murdered.

                But again, I think it's really important to direct our hatred and anger towards the right places.

      • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        It's one thing to dislike the military, it's another to be a class traitor and useful idiot to the capitalist class by shunning others in the proletariat.

        You become a defacto class traitor. And that is certainly worth dunking on.

          • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            4 years ago

            A person joining the military in an attempt to better their life or do what they think is right is no worse than someone joining a corporation to better their lot.

            Blaming the soldiers is cowardly and shortsighted. The blame rests on leadership, and more importantly, the system.

            All you end up doing is destroying solidarity, unnecessarily blaming the victims without understanding or empathy.

              • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                4 years ago

                The millions of innocents slaughtered by American imperialism are absolutely victims.

                And so is the American father who gets blown up in Iraq the day before his child is born, all for the sake of America's lust for oil.

                Saying "they had a choice" ignores materialism and the influences the system has upon all of us.

                Active soldiers, vets, and people that do not yet have class consciousness. When they see there's these stupid hysterics, this blame for American policy on the individual soldiers, they're going to think you're an unreasonable dingbat. And they'd have a point. It absolutely fractures solidarity.

              • supermangoman [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                4 years ago

                Tell me, are soldiers called into action due to a proto fascist insurrection, sleeping a night in a parking garage, the same as a group of the Whermacht burning down a village?

  • acedia
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • Mike_Penis [any]
    ·
    4 years ago

    probably like half of them would want to kill her so uh maybe not a good idea lol