Ok so

-The satellite images are already proven to be highly questionable and inconclusive, even the NYT admits the satellite alone can't prove how those people were killed.

-We know some of the civilians have white armbands which the Russians use to mark friendly collaborators. Why would they massacre them?

-I am hoping you are already aware the curious case of the mayor that didn't mention a massacre when he celebrated Russians leaving.

-As the twitter thread alone gives a dozen different points against the narrative:

Video of Ukraine shelling on Russia troops captured by drone.

Video of Ukraine troops asking if they can shoot civilians.

Video of civilian with tied hands and white armbands(Russian supporters)

What is more likely?

That Russia somehow committed a large irrational mass murder of civilians many of which were sympathizers despite very obvious military doctrine against this throughout the whole war?

That Burcha was under constant shelling for most of the month, the bodies are most likely from different events at different days and as Russia decides to retreat the Ukrainian army decides to try yet again to frame another mass murder scene while giving no explanation or signs of regret for their own nazis conducts including doing these same sort of executions.

We have a literal dozens of videos of people being lynched in public, we know Azov used human shields, they are torturing Russian POWs etc

NYT deliberately spreading fake news would be as far as I know unprecedented.

:shrug-outta-hecks:

You want to live in a world where some guy in front of a TV or some editor for a fancy three letter newspaper earning 6 figures is a trustworthy figure but thousands of people crowdsourcing real videos during a war is "fake news".

I can't imagine being you in 2002-2003 honestly but I guess everyone has to go through this stage I guess.