The civil service examinations of Imperial China allowed the state to find the best candidates to staff the vast bureaucracy that governed China from the Han Dynasty onwards (206 BCE - 220 CE). The exams were a means for a young male of any class to enter that bureaucracy and so become a part of the gentry class of scholar-officials. The exams had multiple levels and were extremely difficult to pass, requiring extensive knowledge of Confucian classics, law, government, and oratory amongst other subjects. For the state, the system supplied not only able candidates who were selected on merit but also ensured an entire class developed which had sympathy with the ruling status quo. The exams were in place for over a thousand years and are the principal reason why education is still particularly revered in Chinese culture today.

Historical Development

The idea of recruiting officials to staff the imperial bureaucracy developed from the Han Dynasty. An Imperial Academy had been established in 124 BCE for scholars to study in depth the Confucian and Taoist classics, and by the end of the Han period, this institution was training an impressive 30,000 students each year. In general, the state held the view that education was a mark of a civilised society and in order to get the best administrators to run China's vast territories efficiently, an entire class of scholar civil servants was required. This view would prevail under varying dynasties right up to the mid-20th century CE. From the early 8th century CE the military had its own separate set of examinations.

The rulers of the Sui Dynasty (581-618 CE), who had once again unified China, were keen to further improve and centralise the traditional administration system set up by the Han. There was now a much greater emphasis not on an officials' family connections and their letters of recommendations from powerful friends but on the abilities demonstrated in their performance in civil service examinations held in the capital. These examinations combined elements from tests used in previous regimes such as questions on government and knowledge of the classics of Chinese literature, especially those on Confucianism.

Emperor Gaozu (r. 618-626 CE), founder of the Tang dynasty (618-906 CE) continued with the same policy and added further refinements such as testing a candidate's speaking skills. The examinations themselves were now more sophisticated with both regularly held ones and special event exams to weed out the very best recruits. Now fully established, the civil service examinations tested a young man's knowledge of the following:

  • writing and calligraphy
  • formal essay writing techniques
  • classic literature
  • mathematics
  • legal matters
  • government matters
  • poetry
  • clear and coherent speaking

Examinations were initially organised by the Board of Civil Office and thereafter by the Board of Rites, they were held annually, and they attracted up to 2,000 candidates. Extremely testing, only about 1% of examinees actually passed, although it was possible to retake the examinations an unlimited number of times. Those who passed then faced another examination at the Board of Civil Office.

During the Song dynasty (960-1279 CE) the examinations were restructured to meet greater demand - five times that seen during the Tang. Now a qualifying examination was imposed to select those candidates more likely to do well in the examinations proper.

There also began in this period certain measures to limit (but certainly not eliminate) corruption such as the introduction of anonymous marking, the use of a number instead of a candidate's name to avoid bias, and, in the case of the second and third level exams, even the copying of handwriting by a clerk to disguise who had answered the papers.

As if the prize ticket of a place in the state apparatus were not enough of an inducement to candidates, there were other benefits, too. Successful candidates were allowed to wear certain robes which became status symbols in wider society, they were given certain tax benefits, and their new status meant they avoided corporal punishment for some criminal offences.

When the Mongols ruled China during the Yuan Dynasty (1276-1368 CE) the exams were first cancelled altogether and then reinstated but with quotas based on a candidate's ethnicity - Han Chinese were only allowed 25% of the exam places. The civil service examination system was fully revived, though, in 1370 CE under the Ming dynasty (1368-1644 CE). Adding their own refinements to the traditional setup of previous Chinese dynasties, the Ming introduced a geographical quota system so that the richer regions did not, as was previously the case, dominate all the positions in the civil service. Meanwhile, the increase in the number of schools meant children with parents who could not afford private tuition could now, at least in some areas, receive the essential education necessary to prepare for the exams.

Under the Qing dynasty (1644-1911 CE) yet another layer of complication was added to the exam system. An examination for younger boys, which they had to pass in order to be eligible to take the level one regional civil service exam, was introduced. The Qing also added another level at the other end of this academic obstacle course. Now candidates who passed the level three palace exam had to do yet another written test, this time set by the emperor himself. The good news was that success in this final paper meant an immediate senior appointment.

Qing abolished the civil service exams system in 1905 CE. Its legacy remains, though, in the particularly high regard, indeed, almost reverence with which education is held in Chinese culture today.

Full article WHE

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • Kestrel [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 minutes ago

    Bob Dylan if he wrote Lemonade

    slay lady slay

    lay your hot sauce in my bag (swag)

  • micnd90 [he/him,any]
    ·
    edit-2
    41 minutes ago

    I was saying it's Kamalover to my coworkers, but then someone pointed out that Kamalover could be mistaken for Kamala-lover, I felt disgusted immediately. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk. God bless you and god bless the united states of america.

    • HarryLime [any]
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      I tell you what, that was some damn good baseball right there

  • SpiderFarmer [he/him]
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    Nurgle worshippers are super problematic, especially considering how cyst-normative they are.

  • DengistDonnieDarko [he/him]
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    sitting here, trying to fill out my mail in ballot. every time I look at this thing I feel absolutely sick to my stomach. I hate this country so fucking much. and I hate that I'm going to be blamed when the Dems lose. I hate all of this. I hate that people after the election will ask me, "who did you vote for? is this YOUR fault???" I hate that I am held captive in this bullshit electoralism, with the fates of everyone I know and love dangled in front of me, like there's a hostage taker holding a gun to my head saying "pick me, or else". I do not blame anyone who can't go through with this, it's sickening.

    • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      If they need my vote they can act like it. If they don't act like it, they didn't need my vote.

  • dustbunnies [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    49 minutes ago

    Show

    I'm sure that they could make write-ins harder than "aggressively tap an ancient touchscreen to fill an unknown character limit with unknown requirements" but idk how

    was I supposed to write "De La Cruz - Garcia" ? or "Claudia De La Cruz"? there wasn't room to do anything else and instructions were non-existent. I did the former, my husband did the latter. hopefully at least one will count.

  • Moonworm [any]
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Most of you probably think Metric is woke. But one time I think someone on here argued that British Imperial standards and measures were based on common-use references of ordinary people. Like a cup is sort of like cupping your hands or a foot is like a big foot. And maybe we should think about that. Hard to deny the elegance of the kilogram though.

  • ashinadash [she/her]
    ·
    1 hour ago
    cw alcohol

    Realising that one of the reasons I like booze is it numbs my chronic pain agni-pain

  • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I see people post about TrumpDS, but I think I'm realizing that this whole "derangement syndrome" thing could be applied to anyone. I have a close friend I see often, and he has admitted to losing sleep thinking about liberals and/or Palestine. We will be hanging out, doing something not about politics at all, and he will just randomly say "FUCKING LIBERALS." Maybe if I heard it from someone else, where it was a surprise to hear. To the flip side, my gfs boomer parents will send anti Trump shit to the group text, usually in the form of a witty comic strip or some shit and I just can't even engage. My gf will text back the briefest reply, her brother never says anything.

    On the brighter side, my friend has admitted he needs some other hobbies other than sitting at his computer playing video games.

    Maybe the human brain just wasn't meant to take in so much information daily, between our jobs and anything outside of that. I guess I'm just tired. Presidential election years are annoying.

      • LocalOaf [they/them, ze/hir]
        ·
        2 hours ago

        ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ trump-anguish

        reach-left 🎮 reach-right

        They're doing DS with the dual screens- you know what this is? They fold the gameboy out like the ladies with the makeup compact and it's like a double gameboy, beautiful twin gameboys, sort of like the Mario and Luigi, but you have the twin gameboys and you take the little pen that you can't write with and you touch the screen like bing bing bong and then you just made a tremendous deal with the Pokemon Company, and we love it! But Japan has been very unfair to us with trade with the DS and the Pokemon and... various things, I will say that.

  • magi [null/void]
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Really tired putting myself out there for people who aren't genuinely interested in me as a person.

    • dustbunnies [she/her, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 hours ago

      omg, feeling this so hard rn cuddle

      supposed to go to a birthday party tomorrow for a friend I like very much but who asks a lot and offers little, and I'm extremely stressed about the party situation

      every previous party of theirs I've attended has left me feeling very fucking weird because they have so many neurotypical friends and I'm so very obviously not

      why am I making myself feel awful to go to a party for a person who would never put their self out there for me? someone who has actually never done a single thing for me and only asked favors of me 😞

      all of this bitching makes it sound like he sucks, he doesn't, he's actually a very cool and chill class traitor dude, I just don't have the energy for this shit

      maybe you relate somewhat? tell me about whoever you're feeling tired of putting yourself out there for ❤️

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Style tip: if you're gonna rail drugs, instead of a bill or actual straw, use a tampon applicator. They're kinda perfect.

  • keepcarrot [she/her]
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Getting evicted again, landlord includes "Enjoy the nice weather and the weekend!" at the end of eviction notice email. Thanks dude

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Do you have a local tenancy board? If so, talk to em. I had a landlord sell a place ou from under us, decided to tell us through a phone call and only gave us a month to leave. She was stupid as hell cause there are laws about these things and a phone call absolutely doesn't count as notice to vacate. Also if she's doing it cause she's selling the place we get 6 months notice IN WRITING, and for it to be legal there is a form for her, the buyer, the tenants and the lawyer handling the sale all need to sign. If you sell a rental property here at least, that includes the tenants. It took 2 extra years and one of our roommates getting cancer to whittle us out and we got our escrowed rent back after.

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Literally the house next door was co-op housing with a member of the tenancy board living there. If she came to us willing to bargain she probably would have lost less money. Give us six months rent free to find a place and give us each $1000. We saw the real estate listing online and she was selling the place for a million. We were essentially looking for 12 grand between 3 people and 9 grand of that is just not paying rent, so she wouldn't have to shell out she just wouldn't have made money.

    • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      "Enjoy the nice weather and the weekend!"

      Write that down. Remember to tell him that when the tables turn.

      I had to fight an eviction about a year ago. Rent has gone up like crazy around here and by kicking us out they'd be able to charge at least $500 more a month. We hired a lawyer and the threat was enough to make the management company back off. If you need any help please reach out on c/mutual_aid or elsewhere.

    • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]
      ·
      3 hours ago

      what's the reason for eviction? have you looked into any legal aid, sometimes there are resources for free legal aid depending on your location.

      • keepcarrot [she/her]
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not yet, found out yesterday, still going through shock. Realistically, we can push back the eviction date a little, but not by that much since the lease was a month by month one to begin with (so the landlord can just yank the chain whenever they like). It's much more the stress of moving what was supposed to be long term housing in a city with not many rentals.

        • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]
          ·
          2 hours ago

          i didnt even think about month to month, that does make sense why they are legally allowed to choose to not let you renew. that's fucked up though, Mao was right.

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Wow that new PhilosophyTube is a real stinker huh? Funny how she had a billion citations for everything but when she started talking about China bad there wasn't a single one for social credit score, manipulating the public, etc. Those things are just a given. And no mention of the US government run bot farms (Eglin Air Force base anyone?) or US state dept meddling in domestic social media (Chapo subreddit ban?) or the ADL doing everything in their power to limit pro-Palestinian content online or...

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah, and I swear she's been much better about China in the past, can't remember when.

        In any case, this is another data point for my "the western left is good at media analysis and nothing else" theory.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Absent proof to the contrary, I think Reddit's purge of leftist subss was less central manipulation by the government and more the capitalist class and the industries they control - media, finance, heavy industry, all having convergent goals and needs, so Reddit would effectively perform the censorship that benefits the government and capitalism but doesn't need to be explicitly told to do so.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]
        ·
        2 hours ago

        https://hexbear.net/post/56333

        Jessica Ashoosh didn't giver up her job at a CIA cutout and become Reddit's anti-evil operations bad boy spanker just for you to deny that the government absolutely played a role in banning us from dunking on hogs.